![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big John wrote in
: On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:22:34 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Big John wrote in m: ----------------------------clip------------------------------- The radio gear has improived quite a lot since then. We regulaly do Cat3 autolandings and damned if the airplane doesn't do them almost perfectly. I mean the needles don't budge on the way down an ILS. Used to be I could go donw an ILS almost as good myself, but we use auto aproach so much nowadays that edge is disappearing. Don;t know about the 380. I vaguely remember one having a runway excursion, but I can't remember where. Bertie Thanks for the info. I'll rest a little easier when in back end and approach is to minimums in heavy rain at night. Oh yeah, it works very well. We can land in absolutely zero/zero perfectly safely, though we actully need a little bit of vis to be legal just so we can find outr way of the runway! But in many places we land with no DH at all, and no requirement to see anything before touchdown, though we always see something. We can land in places we can't take off from! On touchdown, the airplane will continue down the runway absolutely on the center line. The autobrakes will stop us the speedbrakes auto-deploy and the only thing we do manually is select reverse if we want it. 380 may not have been current? You notice that things seem to get recycled at later dates when somone just receives it and forwards with no date of event. Yeah, I can't remember, exactly, but i think it was some time ago. Dunno. Bertie ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----------------------------- Bertie I can see now why the Airlines are talking about taking Private Pilots who have just upgraded to Commercial and putting in right seat to fill coming Pilot shortage due to lack of retired Mil Pilots. Knew you all had zero zero but haden't read that was authorized, except only at a few airports with special birds and trained aircrews. Big brother all the way. That's right. The aircraft has to be certified, and the runway and the crew. There's not a lot to it with us. the autopilot does it and we monitor. There are a number of gates where we check to make sure it's all working and the right lights come on and what not, but it's pretty much just switch the stuff on and guide it onto the ILS. Almost every large airliner still flying can do it nowadays. We're not licenced for 0/0. nobody is because the airport would be logjammed with people taxiing into each other! We can land with 200' vis which ain't much! Bertie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:50:44 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote: Big John wrote in : On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:22:34 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Big John wrote in : ----------------------------clip------------------------------- The radio gear has improived quite a lot since then. We regulaly do Cat3 autolandings and damned if the airplane doesn't do them almost perfectly. I mean the needles don't budge on the way down an ILS. Used to be I could go donw an ILS almost as good myself, but we use auto aproach so much nowadays that edge is disappearing. Don;t know about the 380. I vaguely remember one having a runway excursion, but I can't remember where. Bertie Thanks for the info. I'll rest a little easier when in back end and approach is to minimums in heavy rain at night. Oh yeah, it works very well. We can land in absolutely zero/zero perfectly safely, though we actully need a little bit of vis to be legal just so we can find outr way of the runway! But in many places we land with no DH at all, and no requirement to see anything before touchdown, though we always see something. We can land in places we can't take off from! On touchdown, the airplane will continue down the runway absolutely on the center line. The autobrakes will stop us the speedbrakes auto-deploy and the only thing we do manually is select reverse if we want it. 380 may not have been current? You notice that things seem to get recycled at later dates when somone just receives it and forwards with no date of event. Yeah, I can't remember, exactly, but i think it was some time ago. Dunno. Bertie ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----------------------------- Bertie I can see now why the Airlines are talking about taking Private Pilots who have just upgraded to Commercial and putting in right seat to fill coming Pilot shortage due to lack of retired Mil Pilots. Knew you all had zero zero but haden't read that was authorized, except only at a few airports with special birds and trained aircrews. Big brother all the way. That's right. The aircraft has to be certified, and the runway and the crew. There's not a lot to it with us. the autopilot does it and we monitor. There are a number of gates where we check to make sure it's all working and the right lights come on and what not, but it's pretty much just switch the stuff on and guide it onto the ILS. Almost every large airliner still flying can do it nowadays. We're not licenced for 0/0. nobody is because the airport would be logjammed with people taxiing into each other! We can land with 200' vis which ain't much! Bertie -------------------------------------------------------------------- Bertie This thread is getting long so will be my last to it. Tnx for all the current info. Our mins were 200/1 and I landed with that many times. Became so routine never gave it a second thought. Many landing were in North Bay San Fran (Hamilton Field) with the bay fog. Thick and heavy and no R/W until at mins (or below). Then landing lights to see stripe to clear R/W and taxi back to ramp. Have a good holiday tomorrow. Big John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big John wrote in
: This thread is getting long so will be my last to it. Tnx for all the current info. Our mins were 200/1 and I landed with that many times. Yes, well for me too, and not that long ago! Still is if there;s no Cat 3 or Cat 2] Became so routine never gave it a second thought. Many landing were in North Bay San Fran (Hamilton Field) with the bay fog. Thick and heavy and no R/W until at mins (or below). Then landing lights to see stripe to clear R/W and taxi back to ramp. Have a good holiday tomorrow. Thanks, but work for me tomorrow! See ya, and look after your , you know! Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:14:08 -0600, Big John wrote:
Many landing were in North Bay San Fran (Hamilton Field) with the bay fog. Ha... I was born in the Hamilton Field hospital. -- Dallas |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Fwd: Concord at Heathrow?] | Markus Baur | Aviation Photos | 3 | December 26th 07 11:55 PM |
B747 at Heathrow | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | December 8th 07 09:47 AM |
A380 flew into Heathrow today | Kingfish | Piloting | 82 | May 30th 06 01:55 PM |
Google Earth Heathrow 9L approach | news.east.cox.net | Piloting | 23 | April 20th 06 09:36 PM |