![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:53:22 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote: " wrote in news:6320e4d4-a223-4d50- : On Jan 24, 10:19 am, "Robert M. Gary" wrote: Correct. So if two pilots who have far superior skill and judegement than you or I, that are flying one of the most technically advanced GA aircraft on the market can get into trouble, the rest of us should take a moment to pause. -Robert The G1000 equipped 182 may be technically advanced, but I'm not a big fan of the backup instrument layout and the lack of an electrically- driven turn coordinator. Whats the backup consist of? Bertie Bertie Let me use your post to tell another war story. When The Air defense Command took delivery on the F-106 it was their first bird to have tape gauges and all the gauges were tied to a common power supply that ran most if not all of the electrical things in bird. That power supply failed very often leaving the bird without instruments, Instead of grounding the fleet until the problem was fixed (took over a year) we only flew the F-106 in pairs, day, night, IFR, etc. If one bird had a failure he recovered in formation on the wing of the other bird. That was our redundancy ![]() Big John |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Big John" wrote: That power supply failed very often leaving the bird without instruments, Instead of grounding the fleet until the problem was fixed (took over a year) we only flew the F-106 in pairs, day, night, IFR, etc. If one bird had a failure he recovered in formation on the wing of the other bird. That was our redundancy ![]() Holy ****! And I call myself a pilot. Haw! -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big John wrote in
: On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:53:22 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: " wrote in news:6320e4d4-a223- 4d50- : On Jan 24, 10:19 am, "Robert M. Gary" wrote: Correct. So if two pilots who have far superior skill and judegement than you or I, that are flying one of the most technically advanced GA aircraft on the market can get into trouble, the rest of us should take a moment to pause. -Robert The G1000 equipped 182 may be technically advanced, but I'm not a big fan of the backup instrument layout and the lack of an electrically- driven turn coordinator. Whats the backup consist of? Bertie Bertie Let me use your post to tell another war story. When The Air defense Command took delivery on the F-106 it was their first bird to have tape gauges and all the gauges were tied to a common power supply that ran most if not all of the electrical things in bird. That power supply failed very often leaving the bird without instruments, Instead of grounding the fleet until the problem was fixed (took over a year) we only flew the F-106 in pairs, day, night, IFR, etc. If one bird had a failure he recovered in formation on the wing of the other bird. That was our redundancy ![]() Well, that and the bang seat! Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Uncontrolled Engine Compartment Fire Possible for Cessna 172R, 172S, 182T, T182T, 206H, and T206H Models | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | April 19th 07 04:31 PM |
vampire or venom crash pic - wx904 crash.jpg (1/1) | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 4 | January 1st 07 06:30 PM |
vampire or venom crash pic - wx904 crash.jpg (0/1) | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | December 30th 06 04:57 PM |
Victor Airways in Cessna G1000 T182T | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | May 2nd 06 02:56 AM |
MU 2 Crash just after TO | Gary | Piloting | 15 | December 23rd 05 02:26 AM |