i think I flew into class c airspace accidentally withoutestablishing communication

Peter Clark wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:38:59 -0600, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote:

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
wrote in message
...
VOR is obviously implied by the language to even the most casual reader.

It's not implied at all to an informed reader.



OK Steven, please inform us what electronic navigation
systems these lines are referring to...

2. Demonstrates the ability to use an airborne electronic navigation
system.
3. Locates the airplane's position using the navigation system.
4. Intercepts and tracks a given course, radial or bearing, as
appropriate.

GPS? LORAN? ADF?

And........?

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:50:25 -0600, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote:

Peter Clark wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:38:59 -0600, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote:

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
wrote in message
...
VOR is obviously implied by the language to even the most casual reader.

It's not implied at all to an informed reader.



OK Steven, please inform us what electronic navigation
systems these lines are referring to...

2. Demonstrates the ability to use an airborne electronic navigation
system.
3. Locates the airplane's position using the navigation system.
4. Intercepts and tracks a given course, radial or bearing, as
appropriate.

GPS? LORAN? ADF?

And........?

Of course VOR. I was agreeing that there are multiple choices of
radio style thing that can satisfy that section of the PTS.

"Peter Clark" wrote in message

Of course VOR. I was agreeing that there are multiple choices of
radio style thing that can satisfy that section of the PTS.

But, if the examiner finds out you don't know how to use a VOR, you're not
going to pass your checkride. I'd bet money on it.

(What we need is a DE in here!)

-c

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

wrote in message
...

VOR is obviously implied by the language to even the most casual reader.


It's not implied at all to an informed reader.

Yeah, sure.

I'm willing to bet every pillow, mattress, and piece of furniture in
your house still has the "Do not remove under penalty of law" tag on
it.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

wrote in message
...

Yeah, sure.

I'm willing to bet every pillow, mattress, and piece of furniture in
your house still has the "Do not remove under penalty of law" tag on
it.


You're on. Name the amount.

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

wrote in message
...

Yeah, sure.

I'm willing to bet every pillow, mattress, and piece of furniture in
your house still has the "Do not remove under penalty of law" tag on
it.


You're on. Name the amount.

Said as he scurries through the house looking for all those tags...

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

wrote in message
...

Said as he scurries through the house looking for all those tags...


Welcher.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message

VOR is obviously implied by the language to even the most casual reader.

It's not implied at all to an informed reader.

Try to pass a PPL written, oral or practical without understanding how to
use a VOR.

"gatt" wrote in message
...

Try to pass a PPL written, oral or practical without understanding how to
use a VOR.


That's not the issue.