![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll se if I can find the other information I had. It seemed to be solid
info when I read it. Right of I would have believed it to be right also as the aircooled engines were lighter with more or less same power. -- Claus Gustafsen Strandby Denmark mail me at See my modeling at www.gustafsen.nu "Robert Sveinson" skrev i en meddelelse ... "Claus Gustafsen" wrote in message .. . Funny you say a poor performer - I have read the opposite, that it flew both higer faster and longer than either Mk I or III. The Lancaster Mk II equipped with the Hercules XVI had a similar speed to the Merlin powered ones, but were restricted to a servce ceiling, just above 15,000 ft. at maximum weight, with a higher fuel consumption. Ref: Avro Lancaster The Definitive Record by Harry Holmes -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lancasters, pt 2 - Lancaster 01.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 1 | January 29th 08 10:05 PM |
Lancasters, pt 2 - 002index.jpg (0/1) | Mitchell Holman[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 28th 08 01:20 PM |
Lancasters, pt 2 - 002index.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 28th 08 01:20 PM |
Avro Lancaster - Cutaway Lancaster.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 27th 08 12:42 PM |
75 (NZ) Sqn Lancasters | [email protected] | Restoration | 0 | January 3rd 05 03:02 AM |