![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke schrieb:
In the interest of moving this along, I will guess at your fuzzy parsing and peculiar definition of "oxymoron", ... Although English is not my native language, I did understand it without difficulties, and the sentence fits perfectly the definition of an oxymoron. The formulation was not very elegant, and it can even be debated whether believing in a scientific theory is an oxymoron, but that doesn't change the fact that the point was perfectly understandable. Hmm, I see that oxymoron sounds pretty similar to moron. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stefan" wrote in message . .. Dan Luke schrieb: In the interest of moving this along, I will guess at your fuzzy parsing and peculiar definition of "oxymoron", ... Although English is not my native language, I did understand it Then perhaps you'd like to explain it. and the sentence fits perfectly the definition of an oxymoron. No. An oxymoron is one thing composed of two contrary things that refer to one another. The sentence contains two things that do not modify or refer to each other. Wikipedia: An oxymoron ... is a *figure of speech* that combines two normally contradictory terms. Oxymoron is a loanword from Greek oxy ("sharp") and moros ("dull"). Thus the word oxymoron is itself an oxymoron. Oxymorons are a proper subset of the expressions called contradictions in terms. What distinguishes oxymorons from other paradoxes and contradictions is that they are used intentionally, for rhetorical effect, and the contradiction is only apparent, as the combination of terms provides a novel expression of some concept, such as "cruel to be kind". Hmm, I see that oxymoron sounds pretty similar to moron. Really? Gosh! -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Luke" wrote in
: "Stefan" wrote in message . .. Dan Luke schrieb: In the interest of moving this along, I will guess at your fuzzy parsing and peculiar definition of "oxymoron", ... Although English is not my native language, I did understand it Then perhaps you'd like to explain it. and the sentence fits perfectly the definition of an oxymoron. No. An oxymoron is one thing composed of two contrary things that refer to one another. The sentence contains two things that do not modify or refer to each other. Wikipedia: An oxymoron ... is a *figure of speech* that combines two normally contradictory terms. Oxymoron is a loanword from Greek oxy ("sharp") and moros ("dull"). Thus the word oxymoron is itself an oxymoron. Oxymorons are a proper subset of the expressions called contradictions in terms. What distinguishes oxymorons from other paradoxes and contradictions is that they are used intentionally, for rhetorical effect, and the contradiction is only apparent, as the combination of terms provides a novel expression of some concept, such as "cruel to be kind". Hmm, I see that oxymoron sounds pretty similar to moron. Really? Gosh! It obviously stirred a memory. Bertie |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke schrieb:
Wikipedia: An oxymoron ... Wikipedia, the definitive authoritative source. But thanks, I *do* know what an oxymoron is: e.g. "those who believe in scientific theory" is one. What I don't know however is whether you really don't understand or are just playing some game. Either way, there's no point in trying to explain the abovementioned oxymoron. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan wrote in
: Dan Luke schrieb: Wikipedia: An oxymoron ... Wikipedia, the definitive authoritative source. But thanks, I *do* know what an oxymoron is: e.g. "those who believe in scientific theory" is one. What I don't know however is whether you really don't understand or are just playing some game. Either way, there's no point in trying to explain the abovementioned oxymoron. Let me try to expand your understaindg of the term with an example: Cool Swiss. Bertie |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan wrote:
Dan Luke schrieb: Wikipedia: An oxymoron ... Wikipedia, the definitive authoritative source. But thanks, I *do* know what an oxymoron is: e.g. "those who believe in scientific theory" is one. Do you believe in gravity? That's a Scientific Theory. There are many here that seem to confusing the scientific meaning of the word with the common usage. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder schrieb:
Do you believe in gravity? That's a Scientific Theory. There are many here that seem to confusing the scientific meaning of the word with the common usage. Sometimes it really would help to read the history of a debate and get the context prior to respond. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan wrote in news:a7386$47a751aa$54497f39$8128
@news.hispeed.ch: Gig 601XL Builder schrieb: Do you believe in gravity? That's a Scientific Theory. There are many here that seem to confusing the scientific meaning of the word with the common usage. Sometimes it really would help to read the history of a debate and get the context prior to respond. Sometimes. Not when the debate was written by Lewis Carrol, though. Bertie |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder schrieb: Do you believe in gravity? That's a Scientific Theory. There are many here that seem to confusing the scientific meaning of the word with the common usage. Sometimes it really would help to read the history of a debate and get the context prior to respond. I have read this thread and to raise to the level where I would consider it a debate would take a crane. What it is, is a few people putting forth the idea that it requires a leap of faith to believe a scientific theory that is equal to the leap of faith required to believe in a religion. I personally think that is an insult to both scientific theory and religion. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stefan" wrote: Wikipedia: An oxymoron ... Wikipedia, the definitive authoritative source. But thanks, I *do* know what an oxymoron is: e.g. "those who believe in scientific theory" is one. You are welcome to produce one you consider more authoritative. What I don't know however is whether you really don't understand or are just playing some game. I do understand. The two components do not comprise an oxymoron. They do, however indicate a pattern of misunderstanding on the part of the OP. Either way, there's no point in trying to explain the abovementioned oxymoron. Mmm-hmm. -- Dan "You have a total of 0 fans and 0 friends." -Webshots |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bizarre radio experience | Don Poitras | Piloting | 14 | October 24th 07 01:30 PM |
bizarre notam | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 4 | December 19th 04 08:36 PM |
Bizarre Fatal Accident-Suicide? | Rocky | Piloting | 28 | April 3rd 04 02:08 AM |
And they say the automated Weather Station problems "ASOS" are insignificant because only light aircraft need Weather Observations and forecasts... | Roy | Piloting | 4 | July 12th 03 04:03 PM |