![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 6, 10:24*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: Fixed-wing aircraft taxi because their wheels reduce friction as they move forward on the ground. So, logically, spacecraft in the frictionless environment of outer space should immediately accelerate to the speed of light. Space isn't frictionless dummy. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 6, 10:36*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: Space isn't frictionless dummy. Where does the friction come from? Molecules |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 6, 10:39*am, wrote:
On Feb 6, 10:36*am, Mxsmanic wrote: writes: Space isn't frictionless dummy. Where does the friction come from? Molecules And to answer your next post before you post it: What molecules? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_space |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gee, where would the energy come from to cause the acceleration?
On Feb 6, 2:00*pm, Mxsmanic wrote: writes: And to answer your next post before you post it: What molecules? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_space "While not being an actual perfect vacuum, outer space contains such sparse matter that it can be effectively thought of as one. The pressure of interstellar space is on the order of 10 pPa (1×10-11 Pa)." So, no molecules. *And no friction. Even if you don't wish to consider the hard vacuum of space as perfect, with a pressure that is 10,000,000,000,000,000 times lower than that of Earth at sea level, the friction should be also that much lower, and thus the speed of a taxi should be trillions of times faster. *The speed of light is only fifteen million times faster than a 40-knot taxi, so nearly the speed of light might well be achieved long before any residual friction could have any effect. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: writes: And to answer your next post before you post it: What molecules? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_space "While not being an actual perfect vacuum, outer space contains such sparse matter that it can be effectively thought of as one. A bit like the inside of your skull. Bertie |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 7, 6:00*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: And to answer your next post before you post it: What molecules? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_space "While not being an actual perfect vacuum, outer space contains such sparse matter that it can be effectively thought of as one. The pressure of interstellar space is on the order of 10 pPa (1×10-11 Pa)." So, no molecules. *And no friction. Even if you don't wish to consider the hard vacuum of space as perfect, with a pressure that is 10,000,000,000,000,000 times lower than that of Earth at sea level, the friction should be also that much lower, and thus the speed of a taxi should be trillions of times faster. *The speed of light is only fifteen million times faster than a 40-knot taxi, so nearly the speed of light might well be achieved long before any residual friction could have any effect. The resistance is a function of the density of gas molecules not pressure density is related to pressure by D=PM/RT M=molecular wt P=pressure R=gas constant T=temperature ( absolute ) ie the lower the temperature the higher the density so what is the temperature in interestella space? Resistance is also a function of the velocity squared. think about how bit a number is c sqaured. Terry PPL Downunder |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
yrb-49-taxi.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 2 | September 25th 07 09:50 PM |
Hanoi Taxi | john smith | Piloting | 0 | April 27th 06 03:48 AM |
License To Taxi? | SteveT | Piloting | 29 | October 16th 05 04:57 PM |
Leaning for taxi | Jim Rosinski | Piloting | 28 | September 12th 04 03:53 AM |
taxi in reverse? | [email protected] | Owning | 20 | February 21st 04 12:26 AM |