![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary writes:
On Feb 6, 9:24*am, Mxsmanic wrote: writes: Fixed-wing aircraft taxi because their wheels reduce friction as they move forward on the ground. So, logically, spacecraft in the frictionless environment of outer space should immediately accelerate to the speed of light. No, it still takes energy to accelerate a mass, even in a frictionless environment. But the original post said that aircraft taxi because their wheels reduce friction. No mention of energy or force. So if the statement is true, movement results from a lack of friction alone, so zero friction should produce infinite speed (or lightspeed if one allows the speed of light as an absolute upper limit). However, space (especially near space) is not frictionless. Nor does friction produce acceleration. QED. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 6, 12:02*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Robert M. Gary writes: On Feb 6, 9:24*am, Mxsmanic wrote: writes: Fixed-wing aircraft taxi because their wheels reduce friction as they move forward on the ground. So, logically, spacecraft in the frictionless environment of outer space should immediately accelerate to the speed of light. No, it still takes energy to accelerate a mass, even in a frictionless environment. But the original post said that aircraft taxi because their wheels reduce friction. *No mention of energy or force. *So if the statement is true, movement results from a lack of friction alone, so zero friction should produce infinite speed (or lightspeed if one allows the speed of light as an absolute upper limit). However, space (especially near space) is not frictionless. Nor does friction produce acceleration. *QED. Your post about airplanes flying stated that it was because of the wings, no mention of energy or force, moron! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 6, 2:41*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: Your post about airplanes flying stated that it was because of the wings, no mention of energy or force, moron! What does that have to do with taxiing? You tell me, you posed the question. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 6, 8:04*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: You tell me, you posed the question. No, I did not. What object could ever be accelerated to the speed of light? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/6/2008 6:04 PM Mxsmanic ignored two million years of human
evolution to write: No, I did not. Actually, you tedious lying idiot, you did. But since you employ your usual dishonest method of editing the context out of posts to which you reply, who can tell - unless, of course, one simply looks at the posts in this thread? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 6, 12:02 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
But the original post said that aircraft taxi because their wheels reduce friction. No mention of energy or force. So if the statement is true, movement results from a lack of friction alone, so zero friction should produce infinite speed (or lightspeed if one allows the speed of light as an absolute upper limit). However, space (especially near space) is not frictionless. So, would having wheels reduce the friction in near space? Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
yrb-49-taxi.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 2 | September 25th 07 09:50 PM |
Hanoi Taxi | john smith | Piloting | 0 | April 27th 06 03:48 AM |
License To Taxi? | SteveT | Piloting | 29 | October 16th 05 04:57 PM |
Leaning for taxi | Jim Rosinski | Piloting | 28 | September 12th 04 03:53 AM |
taxi in reverse? | [email protected] | Owning | 20 | February 21st 04 12:26 AM |