"V-22 squadron achieves successin Iraq, USMC says"

On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:52:26 -0500, Vince wrote:


do you need another block of instruction on logistics?


I got irelevant bull**** claims

Logistics has been a subject of military study since Marius. I've
studied French German and US systems evolved since the 1860s.

I call BS.

If you had studied military logistics you would have noticed when me
and red began making fun of you.

In fact every one of your posts did nothing but drive home the point
that you do not have the first clue about logistics.

Liar.


--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.

Colin Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:52:26 -0500, Vince wrote:


do you need another block of instruction on logistics?

I got irelevant bull**** claims

Logistics has been a subject of military study since Marius. I've
studied French German and US systems evolved since the 1860s.

I call BS.

If you had studied military logistics you would have noticed when me
and red began making fun of you.


I noticed and ignored you making a fool of yourself


In fact every one of your posts did nothing but drive home the point
that you do not have the first clue about logistics.


more personal abuse from the persons with no facts


Vince

Ponce wrote:

Colin Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:52:26 -0500, Vince wrote:


do you need another block of instruction on logistics?

I got irelevant bull**** claims

Logistics has been a subject of military study since Marius. I've
studied French German and US systems evolved since the 1860s.

I call BS.

If you had studied military logistics you would have noticed when me
and red began making fun of you.


I noticed and ignored you making a fool of yourself

In fact every one of your posts did nothing but drive home the point
that you do not have the first clue about logistics.


more personal abuse from the persons with no facts

so you admit that your posts are just mental masturbation on your part....

your therapist will be pleased at this breakthrough, although we've known
it for years. after today's political news i needed a good laugh. thanks for
providing it at your expense.

i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you did that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.

redc1c4,
your knowledge of logistical matters isn't even power point deep. %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

redc1c4 wrote:
Ponce wrote:
Colin Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:52:26 -0500, Vince wrote:


do you need another block of instruction on logistics?
I got irelevant bull**** claims

Logistics has been a subject of military study since Marius. I've
studied French German and US systems evolved since the 1860s.
I call BS.

If you had studied military logistics you would have noticed when me
and red began making fun of you.

I noticed and ignored you making a fool of yourself

In fact every one of your posts did nothing but drive home the point
that you do not have the first clue about logistics.

more personal abuse from the persons with no facts

so you admit that your posts are just mental masturbation on your part....


more abuse form the contentless poster

your therapist will be pleased at this breakthrough, although we've known
it for years. after today's political news i needed a good laugh. thanks for
providing it at your expense.

i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you did that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.

then repeat them

please show how no outposts in Iraq are suppleid only by air

Vince

"Vince" wrote in message
. ..
redc1c4 wrote:


i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in
Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you did
that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.

then repeat them

please show how no outposts in Iraq are suppleid only by air

It's been a few years since my last logic course, but I'm pretty sure that
"all ammunition supply in Iraq is transported by air" and "no outposts in
Iraq are supplied only be air" are not even close to being the same
statement.

Glenn D.

Glenn Dowdy wrote:
"Vince" wrote in message
. ..
redc1c4 wrote:

i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in
Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you did
that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.
then repeat them

please show how no outposts in Iraq are suppleid only by air

It's been a few years since my last logic course, but I'm pretty sure that
"all ammunition supply in Iraq is transported by air" and "no outposts in
Iraq are supplied only be air" are not even close to being the same
statement.

Glenn D.


feel free to quote a post where I made any such comment


Vince

"Vince" wrote in message
. ..
Glenn Dowdy wrote:
"Vince" wrote in message
. ..
redc1c4 wrote:

i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in
Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you
did that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.
then repeat them

please show how no outposts in Iraq are suppleid only by air

It's been a few years since my last logic course, but I'm pretty sure
that "all ammunition supply in Iraq is transported by air" and "no
outposts in Iraq are supplied only be air" are not even close to being
the same statement.

Glenn D.
feel free to quote a post where I made any such comment


Please post where I made that claim. Reading comprehension lagging today?

Glenn D.

On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:28:54 -0800, redc1c4
wrote:


i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you did that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.

The most amusing thing was that the claimed to know how ammunition is
moved - but did not even catch on to the term 'Class V.'



--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.

Colin Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:28:54 -0800, redc1c4
wrote:


i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you did that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.

The most amusing thing was that the claimed to know how ammunition is
moved - but did not even catch on to the term 'Class V.'

OFCS

You are simply adding to the demonstration of ignorance

"Class V" is a question of supply not logistics

http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...63-2-1/Ch8.htm

"The Oxford English dictionary defines logistics as: “The branch of
military science having to do with procuring, maintaining and
transporting material, personnel and facilities.”Another dictionary
definition is: "The time related positioning of resources." As such,
logistics is commonly seen as a branch of engineering which creates
"people systems" rather than "machine systems""


Logistics decides inter alia what type of supply system you can organize


Sheesh

Vince

On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 09:16:35 -0500, Vince wrote:

Colin Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:28:54 -0800, redc1c4
wrote:


i've yet to see you defend your claim that all ammunition resupply in Iraq
is transported via air assets. care to cite the message ID where you did that?
i certainly provided several definitive cites showing otherwise.

The most amusing thing was that the claimed to know how ammunition is
moved - but did not even catch on to the term 'Class V.'

OFCS

You are simply adding to the demonstration of ignorance

"Class V" is a question of supply not logistics

ROTFL!

Thank you for demonstrating that you have no clue.

Do you really think that 'classes of supply' and the logistics of
moving them are separate issues?

Here is a clue for you (now you can say you have one):

The term 'priority of supply' is part of the logistics annex in an
Operations Order. Each supply category is given a priority and the
highest priorities are the focus of the logistics effort.

Here is another clue for you (now you can claim to have _two_ clues!):

Each class of supply has different movement priorities. For example:
toilet paper (a Class II item) would not be moved by air because it
tends to be a very low priority item.

Class III and V are high cube and mass items that are typically moved
on the ground. However - air movement is always planned for as a
contingency because of its criticality in fighting a battle.


Besides - you have still not explained why we should take your
uninformed opinion as to the effectiveness of the aircraft over that
of the people who actually fly it and maintain it.



--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.