![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RustYŠ" wrote in
: "RVB" wrote in message ... Have you bought a new lens ? Or have you changed your post-processing ? I changed my camera in a few months ago from the Canon 10D to a 40D. Although the 10D had served me well for over four years I needed the extra buffer capacity, speed and pixels of the 40D. At the same time I ordered a 300mm f2.8 (and a 1.4 extender). This new lens is so sharp that it still amazes me but the great advantage is this set-up is that I no longer need to pan and zoom at the same time (as I did before with the 100-300mm). I still use the zoom for the Hercs and the Andover here but even with some severe cropping the 300mm fixed lens gives better pictures (and I never will get used to a 'trombone zoom'). The exif data is left in these files by Photoshop CS so if you download a file to your desktop, right click on it and select Properties/Summary/Advanced all will be revealed. Rusty rides again! Lovely work, even if it's from a Canon! (I'm trying desperately to justify a Nikkor 300/2.8 to myself. Sigh, so much glass, so little money) For now, the 300/4 will have to do. RobG (The Aussie one) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RobG" wrote in message ... (as I did before with the 100-300mm). That should of course read 100-400....... Lovely work, even if it's from a Canon! (I'm trying desperately to justify a Nikkor 300/2.8 to myself. I can honestly say that I do not have a single bad word to say about Canon (well OK that 'trombone' zoom idea sucks) but I also know folks with Nikon gear who swear by that too. My only advice would be to avoid Sigma lenses and pay the extra for the real thing. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RustYŠ" wrote
My only advice would be to avoid Sigma lenses and pay the extra for the real thing. Yeah, already have. 17-55/2.8 DX, 70-200/2.8 VR (what a sweet piece of glass that one is), the 300/4 and a TC-17 to add a little extra length when required, with a D200 to hold 'em up. That said, I'm considering the Tamron 12-24, which has had very favourable reviews from the keen amateurs and pros I listen to. Would love the Nikon version, but it's about 3 times the price here... Seriously, there's nothing wrong with Canon (as you well know). It's just the Nikonite and the Canonian thing. Keep making pretty pictures. RobG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yesterday - 8334-W.jpg (1/1) | RustYŠ | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 18th 07 09:20 AM |
Yesterday - 8332-W.jpg (1/1) | RustYŠ | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 18th 07 09:20 AM |
Yesterday - 8218-W.jpg (1/1) | RustYŠ | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 18th 07 09:18 AM |
Another one down near DC yesterday | Wiz | Piloting | 6 | February 27th 06 04:36 PM |
Saw a B-24 Yesterday | Jdf4cheval | Military Aviation | 1 | May 19th 04 05:37 AM |