A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Yesterday



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 9th 08, 12:31 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
RobG
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default Yesterday

"RustYŠ" wrote in
:


"RVB" wrote in message
...

Have you bought a new lens ? Or have you changed your post-processing
?


I changed my camera in a few months ago from the Canon 10D to a 40D.
Although the 10D had served me well for over four years I needed the
extra buffer capacity, speed and pixels of the 40D. At the same time
I ordered a 300mm f2.8 (and a 1.4 extender). This new lens is so
sharp that it still amazes me but the great advantage is this set-up
is that I no longer need to pan and zoom at the same time (as I did
before with the 100-300mm). I still use the zoom for the Hercs and
the Andover here but even with some severe cropping the 300mm fixed
lens gives better pictures (and I never will get used to a 'trombone
zoom'). The exif data is left in these files by Photoshop CS so if
you download a file to your desktop, right click on it and select
Properties/Summary/Advanced all will be revealed.




Rusty rides again! Lovely work, even if it's from a Canon! (I'm trying
desperately to justify a Nikkor 300/2.8 to myself. Sigh, so much glass, so
little money) For now, the 300/4 will have to do.
RobG
(The Aussie one)
  #2  
Old February 9th 08, 12:47 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
RustYŠ RustYŠ is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,048
Default Yesterday


"RobG" wrote in message
...

(as I did before with the 100-300mm).


That should of course read 100-400.......

Lovely work, even if it's from a Canon! (I'm trying
desperately to justify a Nikkor 300/2.8 to myself.


I can honestly say that I do not have a single bad word to say about Canon
(well OK that 'trombone' zoom idea sucks) but I also know folks with Nikon
gear who swear by that too. My only advice would be to avoid Sigma lenses
and pay the extra for the real thing.


  #3  
Old February 9th 08, 11:49 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
RobG
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default Yesterday

"RustYŠ" wrote

My only advice would be to
avoid Sigma lenses and pay the extra for the real thing.


Yeah, already have. 17-55/2.8 DX, 70-200/2.8 VR (what a sweet piece of
glass that one is), the 300/4 and a TC-17 to add a little extra length when
required, with a D200 to hold 'em up. That said, I'm considering the Tamron
12-24, which has had very favourable reviews from the keen amateurs and
pros I listen to. Would love the Nikon version, but it's about 3 times the
price here...

Seriously, there's nothing wrong with Canon (as you well know). It's just
the Nikonite and the Canonian thing.

Keep making pretty pictures.

RobG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yesterday - 8334-W.jpg (1/1) RustYŠ Aviation Photos 0 April 18th 07 09:20 AM
Yesterday - 8332-W.jpg (1/1) RustYŠ Aviation Photos 0 April 18th 07 09:20 AM
Yesterday - 8218-W.jpg (1/1) RustYŠ Aviation Photos 0 April 18th 07 09:18 AM
Another one down near DC yesterday Wiz Piloting 6 February 27th 06 04:36 PM
Saw a B-24 Yesterday Jdf4cheval Military Aviation 1 May 19th 04 05:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Š2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.