"V-22 squadron achieves successin Iraq, USMC says"

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:42:51 GMT, "La N"
wrote:


"Vince" wrote in message
news
La N wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote in
message ...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started making fun of
you by - using standardized logistics terminology that you did not
understand.



Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad grammar
...


- nilita

he does not know the difference between supply and logistics so the case
is closed


Well, it has been an "interesting" debate between 2 people, each of whom
has
never been known to admit when they have been wrong ...%)

That is not a fair accusation when aimed at Vince.


Well, maybe it's because he's never been wrong? ..

He has never declared himself to be at the losing end of an argument, so I
guess, then, that Vince is always right? I like Vince, but he *does* - like
so many people - have an ego that prevents him from saying something to the
effect of, "Okay, we'll just have to agree to disagree on that." He is
always right, and the other person is always wrong.

- nilita

On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:24:55 GMT, "La N"
wrote:


"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:42:51 GMT, "La N"
wrote:


"Vince" wrote in message
news La N wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote in
message ...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started making fun of
you by - using standardized logistics terminology that you did not
understand.



Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad grammar
...


- nilita

he does not know the difference between supply and logistics so the case
is closed


Well, it has been an "interesting" debate between 2 people, each of whom
has
never been known to admit when they have been wrong ...%)

That is not a fair accusation when aimed at Vince.


Well, maybe it's because he's never been wrong? ..

He has never declared himself to be at the losing end of an argument, so I
guess, then, that Vince is always right?

That is simply not true. Like most, he simply abandons a point
when he yeilds it. Pragmatically speaking, it's the best thing to
do.


Peter Skelton

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:24:55 GMT, "La N"
wrote:


"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:42:51 GMT, "La N"
wrote:


"Vince" wrote in message
newsKGdnflXQp7fKjDanZ2dnUVZ_ovinZ2d@comcast. com...
La N wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove underscore) wrote
in
message ...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started making fun of
you by - using standardized logistics terminology that you did not
understand.



Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad grammar
...


- nilita

he does not know the difference between supply and logistics so the
case
is closed


Well, it has been an "interesting" debate between 2 people, each of whom
has
never been known to admit when they have been wrong ...%)

That is not a fair accusation when aimed at Vince.


Well, maybe it's because he's never been wrong? ..

He has never declared himself to be at the losing end of an argument, so I
guess, then, that Vince is always right?

That is simply not true. Like most, he simply abandons a point
when he yeilds it. Pragmatically speaking, it's the best thing to
do.

Oh, I see ... whatever you say ....

- nilita

La N wrote:
"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:42:51 GMT, "La N"
wrote:

"Vince" wrote in message
news La N wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove
underscore) wrote in message
...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started
making fun of you by - using standardized logistics
terminology that you did not understand.


Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad
grammar ...

- nilita
he does not know the difference between supply and logistics so
the case is closed

Well, it has been an "interesting" debate between 2 people, each
of whom has never been known to admit when they have been wrong
...%)

That is not a fair accusation when aimed at Vince.


Well, maybe it's because he's never been wrong? ..

He has never declared himself to be at the losing end of an argument,
so I guess, then, that Vince is always right? I like Vince, but he
*does* - like so many people - have an ego that prevents him from
saying something to the effect of, "Okay, we'll just have to agree to
disagree on that." He is always right, and the other person is
always wrong.

- nilita


I am often wrong. I can't spell and my "than and then" is shaky.
On inferences I am always willing to agree to disagree

In my syllabus it states

"Participation points are not given for merely answering questions.
Participation points are awarded for special contribution to
discussions, especially sticking your neck out to argue the logic of a
class topic with me. Pointing out a significant error in my logic or
facts gets extra credit."

My engineers delight in catching me in a technical error
They get credit for it.


Vince















..