A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why airplanes fly



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 9th 08, 07:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,735
Default Why airplanes fly

Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in news:lJ-
:

WingFlaps wrote:
On Feb 8, 12:20 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:

Interesting story and I can well believe he could have broken the
barrier as described. I also heard that the X1 was in fact designed

by
the British and given to the Americans, along with data, due to the
expense of the British supersonic program and problems with
repaying war debt. Do you know anything about that -I once saw a
old picture

of
an "X1" in the UK but can't find it now.

Cheers
To my knowledge, the X1 was a request research project from the old

NACA
(now NASA) to Bell aircraft for an aircraft capable of making the
attempt to break the speed of sound.
I've never heard any mention of a design from the Brits.



Yeah, it was a Miles aircraft. The M-52
They got as far as a mockup but dropped the project. It had a
stabiliator and the brits are fond of whining that it was that
development on the X! that enabled it to break the sound barrier.
However, this was not a Brit innovation. As usual, the germans had
realised that in the thirtie, years before Miles..




Actually, the
design concept was quite simple. They did the entire aircraft based
on ballistic tests with a 50 Cal. bullet even to taking the canopy
out of the equation and replacing it with molded in windows.
Based on the ballistic tests of the 1/2 inch bullet, Bell designers
expected the same transonic performance from the X1 provided they

could
get it up to speed.
The horizontal tail proved to be the only real issue and they
changed that to a slab tail to solve the shock issue.
The F86 prototype was having the same problems at the same time in

dives.
It's interesting that North American added a stabilator to the 86

later
on in it's production run but to my knowledge George Welsh who broke

the
barrier the week before Yeager had a regular tail on the prototype

which
was carried through to the first A Sabre.


Yeah. A stabilator or at least a rapidly trimmable stab is essential
for a transonic aircraft o avoid excessive buffeting on the stab due
to camber introduced through moving elevators up and down..

Bertie


The way I heard the story from a few guys who were at Edwards during
the period was that there was information passed back and forth
between the Brits and bell about the Miles project but it was the US
that stopped trading out data due to the Brit program getting bogged
down.


Just as well considering their complete inability to keep thier
intelligence services under control.


I know a lot of what the Brits had in research being done early
on at Boscombe Down came out of the German research, and you are right
about Lippisch. He was a genius. His work on tailless stuff is still
considered important.
As for the slab tail. I hate to admit it, but Bell I think might very
well have lifted this idea from the Miles project and incorporated it
into the X1. The shock issue at the hinge on the horizontal stabilizer
was common knowledge and a solution was really needed for the X1.
That whole period was involved a ton of stolen ideas back and forth,
and some of it really started back in the German research. Those guys
were a fair bunch of aerodynamic brains :-))


Well, nothing was created in a vacuum! Everything was ripped off and
built upon ultimately.


  #2  
Old February 9th 08, 07:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Dudley Henriques[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,546
Default Why airplanes fly

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in news:lJ-
:

WingFlaps wrote:
On Feb 8, 12:20 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:

Interesting story and I can well believe he could have broken the
barrier as described. I also heard that the X1 was in fact designed
by
the British and given to the Americans, along with data, due to the
expense of the British supersonic program and problems with
repaying war debt. Do you know anything about that -I once saw a
old picture
of
an "X1" in the UK but can't find it now.

Cheers
To my knowledge, the X1 was a request research project from the old
NACA
(now NASA) to Bell aircraft for an aircraft capable of making the
attempt to break the speed of sound.
I've never heard any mention of a design from the Brits.

Yeah, it was a Miles aircraft. The M-52
They got as far as a mockup but dropped the project. It had a
stabiliator and the brits are fond of whining that it was that
development on the X! that enabled it to break the sound barrier.
However, this was not a Brit innovation. As usual, the germans had
realised that in the thirtie, years before Miles..




Actually, the
design concept was quite simple. They did the entire aircraft based
on ballistic tests with a 50 Cal. bullet even to taking the canopy
out of the equation and replacing it with molded in windows.
Based on the ballistic tests of the 1/2 inch bullet, Bell designers
expected the same transonic performance from the X1 provided they
could
get it up to speed.
The horizontal tail proved to be the only real issue and they
changed that to a slab tail to solve the shock issue.
The F86 prototype was having the same problems at the same time in
dives.
It's interesting that North American added a stabilator to the 86
later
on in it's production run but to my knowledge George Welsh who broke
the
barrier the week before Yeager had a regular tail on the prototype
which
was carried through to the first A Sabre.

Yeah. A stabilator or at least a rapidly trimmable stab is essential
for a transonic aircraft o avoid excessive buffeting on the stab due
to camber introduced through moving elevators up and down..

Bertie

The way I heard the story from a few guys who were at Edwards during
the period was that there was information passed back and forth
between the Brits and bell about the Miles project but it was the US
that stopped trading out data due to the Brit program getting bogged
down.


Just as well considering their complete inability to keep thier
intelligence services under control.


I know a lot of what the Brits had in research being done early
on at Boscombe Down came out of the German research, and you are right
about Lippisch. He was a genius. His work on tailless stuff is still
considered important.
As for the slab tail. I hate to admit it, but Bell I think might very
well have lifted this idea from the Miles project and incorporated it
into the X1. The shock issue at the hinge on the horizontal stabilizer
was common knowledge and a solution was really needed for the X1.
That whole period was involved a ton of stolen ideas back and forth,
and some of it really started back in the German research. Those guys
were a fair bunch of aerodynamic brains :-))


Well, nothing was created in a vacuum! Everything was ripped off and
built upon ultimately.


Lots of cloak and dagger stuff going on back then....probably would make
a great movie plot :-)

--
Dudley Henriques
  #3  
Old February 9th 08, 07:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,735
Default Why airplanes fly

Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in news:lJ-
:

WingFlaps wrote:
On Feb 8, 12:20 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:

Interesting story and I can well believe he could have broken the
barrier as described. I also heard that the X1 was in fact

designed
by
the British and given to the Americans, along with data, due to

the
expense of the British supersonic program and problems with
repaying war debt. Do you know anything about that -I once saw a
old picture
of
an "X1" in the UK but can't find it now.

Cheers
To my knowledge, the X1 was a request research project from the

old
NACA
(now NASA) to Bell aircraft for an aircraft capable of making the
attempt to break the speed of sound.
I've never heard any mention of a design from the Brits.

Yeah, it was a Miles aircraft. The M-52
They got as far as a mockup but dropped the project. It had a
stabiliator and the brits are fond of whining that it was that
development on the X! that enabled it to break the sound barrier.
However, this was not a Brit innovation. As usual, the germans had
realised that in the thirtie, years before Miles..




Actually, the
design concept was quite simple. They did the entire aircraft

based
on ballistic tests with a 50 Cal. bullet even to taking the canopy
out of the equation and replacing it with molded in windows.
Based on the ballistic tests of the 1/2 inch bullet, Bell

designers
expected the same transonic performance from the X1 provided they
could
get it up to speed.
The horizontal tail proved to be the only real issue and they
changed that to a slab tail to solve the shock issue.
The F86 prototype was having the same problems at the same time in
dives.
It's interesting that North American added a stabilator to the 86
later
on in it's production run but to my knowledge George Welsh who

broke
the
barrier the week before Yeager had a regular tail on the prototype
which
was carried through to the first A Sabre.

Yeah. A stabilator or at least a rapidly trimmable stab is

essential
for a transonic aircraft o avoid excessive buffeting on the stab

due
to camber introduced through moving elevators up and down..

Bertie

The way I heard the story from a few guys who were at Edwards during
the period was that there was information passed back and forth
between the Brits and bell about the Miles project but it was the US
that stopped trading out data due to the Brit program getting bogged
down.


Just as well considering their complete inability to keep thier
intelligence services under control.


I know a lot of what the Brits had in research being done early
on at Boscombe Down came out of the German research, and you are

right
about Lippisch. He was a genius. His work on tailless stuff is still
considered important.
As for the slab tail. I hate to admit it, but Bell I think might

very
well have lifted this idea from the Miles project and incorporated

it
into the X1. The shock issue at the hinge on the horizontal

stabilizer
was common knowledge and a solution was really needed for the X1.
That whole period was involved a ton of stolen ideas back and forth,
and some of it really started back in the German research. Those

guys
were a fair bunch of aerodynamic brains :-))


Well, nothing was created in a vacuum! Everything was ripped off and
built upon ultimately.


Lots of cloak and dagger stuff going on back then....probably would

make
a great movie plot :-)


Heh! It mostly came down to who's germans were better!


Bertie
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New and Used Airplanes [email protected] Products 0 May 29th 07 05:02 PM
How many GA airplanes... john smith Piloting 2 May 10th 06 05:19 PM
Q On NYC Airplanes John A. Weeks III General Aviation 3 March 16th 06 12:35 PM
AIRPLANES! W P Dixon Home Built 10 October 7th 04 11:28 AM
E-bay airplanes Paul Folbrecht Owning 11 March 4th 04 12:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.