A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

CB SWR meter on 122Mhz?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 13th 08, 04:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Jay Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 521
Default CB SWR meter on 122Mhz?

On 2008-02-13, RST Engineering wrote:
"noman" wrote in message
...
Otherwise, range and clarity are fine. I just got to wondering if my
homemade antenna or cable are a problem. To do the original install,
I used an rf field strength meter and simply adjusted the antenna
length for highest reading.

That probably wasn't the cleverest way of doing it.


Maybe not the cleverest way, but it's probably good enough that it's working
fine.

Describe your installation a little more, but I think I can guarantee you
that it isn't the antenna.


I agree. This sounds like a front end overload problem. No antenna in the
world will fix that. (Well, at least not and still work for the intended
purpose.)
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!)
Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390
  #2  
Old February 15th 08, 02:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Mark Hickey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 61
Default CB SWR meter on 122Mhz?

Jay Maynard wrote:

On 2008-02-13, RST Engineering wrote:
"noman" wrote in message
...
Otherwise, range and clarity are fine. I just got to wondering if my
homemade antenna or cable are a problem. To do the original install,
I used an rf field strength meter and simply adjusted the antenna
length for highest reading.

That probably wasn't the cleverest way of doing it.


Maybe not the cleverest way, but it's probably good enough that it's working
fine.


I've had variable luck using that approach on other types of antennas.
It's probably a better approach than the typical SWAG.

Describe your installation a little more, but I think I can guarantee you
that it isn't the antenna.


I agree. This sounds like a front end overload problem. No antenna in the
world will fix that. (Well, at least not and still work for the intended
purpose.)


I agree - the only way his antenna is likely to fix it is by removing
it altogether (which, as you point out will not help the operation of
the radio much).

No doubt the problem is that (like Jim pointed out) the FM signal is
mixing with some other signal. The question is whether that's
happening inside the portable radio, or outside it.

If it's inside the radio, reducing the amount of broadcast FM signal
getting into the receiver's front end would help. Personally, I'd do
this by putting a T connector in line with the antenna, and plugg in a
shorted quarter-wavelength (at the offending FM frequency) chunk of
shorted coax on the extra connector. The length of the stub depends
on the coax you use, and the type of connector.

If this doesn't help it's likely that the mixing is occurring
somewhere else. If it's outside the aircraft, there's not a lot you
can do (though that would mean that almost everyone would have the
problem). If the mixing is happening in the aircraft, it'll be "more
fun" to find. Someone suggested unplugging your ELT (a possibility,
and easy enough to do - just don't schedule any crashes when doing
this). ;-) I've seen all kinds of metal structures become effective
RF mixers - so the problem could be almost anywhere in a typical
aircraft (note: I don't recommend removing metal in the process of
looking for the mixing source - you may really NEED that ELT if you do
that). ;-)

Mark Hickey
  #3  
Old February 15th 08, 02:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default CB SWR meter on 122Mhz?


"Mark Hickey" wrote in message
...

-----------------preceding posts snipped-----------

If it's inside the radio, reducing the amount of broadcast FM signal
getting into the receiver's front end would help. Personally, I'd do
this by putting a T connector in line with the antenna, and plugg in a
shorted quarter-wavelength (at the offending FM frequency) chunk of
shorted coax on the extra connector. The length of the stub depends
on the coax you use, and the type of connector.

----------------remainder snipped-----------------

Mark Hickey


This is the method which I have seen work most frequently, although that
mainly involved listeners radios in their homes. It also has the advantage
of being cheap.

Peter


  #4  
Old February 17th 08, 04:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Jumpin Jahosaphat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default CB SWR meter on 122Mhz?

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:16:09 -0700, Mark Hickey wrote:

Jay Maynard wrote:

snip
If this doesn't help it's likely that the mixing is occurring
somewhere else. If it's outside the aircraft, there's not a lot you
can do (though that would mean that almost everyone would have the
problem). If the mixing is happening in the aircraft, it'll be "more
fun" to find.


snip
Mark Hickey


Also you might try putting a 20-30 db attenuator on your radio connector.
If the signal remains then probably originating (ie mixing products)
outside the radio. If the interference goes away it is most liking
occuring inside the radio.
John

  #5  
Old February 17th 08, 04:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Jay Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 521
Default CB SWR meter on 122Mhz?

On 2008-02-17, Jumpin Jahosaphat wrote:
Also you might try putting a 20-30 db attenuator on your radio connector.
If the signal remains then probably originating (ie mixing products)
outside the radio. If the interference goes away it is most liking
occuring inside the radio.


Good idea. One note: DO NOT TRANSMIT WITH THE ATTENUATOR IN THE LINE. You
WILL destroy it, and likely your transmitter's final amplifier as well if
you transmit for too long after destroying the attenuator.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!)
Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390
  #6  
Old February 26th 08, 12:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default CB SWR meter on 122Mhz?

Jay Maynard wrote:
On 2008-02-17, Jumpin Jahosaphat wrote:
Also you might try putting a 20-30 db attenuator on your radio connector.
If the signal remains then probably originating (ie mixing products)
outside the radio. If the interference goes away it is most liking
occuring inside the radio.


Good idea. One note: DO NOT TRANSMIT WITH THE ATTENUATOR IN THE LINE. You
WILL destroy it, and likely your transmitter's final amplifier as well if
you transmit for too long after destroying the attenuator.


While it may cook the attenuator, provided he's move on from vacuum
tubes, it's unlikely that a 12 or 24v driven transistor final is going
to burn up even if it's a complete mismatch.
  #7  
Old February 26th 08, 12:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Jay Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 521
Default CB SWR meter on 122Mhz?

On 2008-02-26, Ron Natalie wrote:
Jay Maynard wrote:
Good idea. One note: DO NOT TRANSMIT WITH THE ATTENUATOR IN THE LINE. You
WILL destroy it, and likely your transmitter's final amplifier as well if
you transmit for too long after destroying the attenuator.

While it may cook the attenuator, provided he's move on from vacuum
tubes, it's unlikely that a 12 or 24v driven transistor final is going
to burn up even if it's a complete mismatch.


Transmitting at full power into an open circuit - which is what you'd get
after burning up the attenuator - is about the worst thing you can do to a
final, especially a transistor one. Solid state finals are less forgiving
than tube finals, and abuse that would just make the tubes run hotter than
normal will burn up transistors quickly.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!)
Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390
  #8  
Old February 26th 08, 03:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,147
Default CB SWR meter on 122Mhz?

Excuse me, sir, but most of us who design moderate power solid state
transmitters wouldn't THINK of a circuit that didn't have full VSWR
protection, either by overdesign of the output devices or a VSWR loop to
shut the finals down in the event of a situation that you describe.

And no, they don't run hotter. The normal failure mode is secondary
breakdown due to voltage spikes in the output matching circuitry.

And, given a random length of coax between the transmitter and the open
circuit, all you can guarantee is that you will be on the outer ring of the
Smith chart somewhere between an open and a short ... a pure open is a very
low probability.

Jim




Transmitting at full power into an open circuit - which is what you'd get
after burning up the attenuator - is about the worst thing you can do to a
final, especially a transistor one. Solid state finals are less forgiving
than tube finals, and abuse that would just make the tubes run hotter than
normal will burn up transistors quickly.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For sale: DG-600 17-meter and 15-meter wingtips Lars Peder Hansen Soaring 0 January 21st 07 06:18 PM
FS: G Meter nobody Aviation Marketplace 0 August 6th 05 06:58 PM
G meter Paul Anton Home Built 0 June 4th 05 06:45 PM
SWR meter Paul Lee Home Built 3 May 31st 04 02:47 PM
G-meter G.R. Patterson III Piloting 2 February 29th 04 03:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.