![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Clark wrote in
: On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:24:52 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: David Lesher wrote in news:fp1t8e$8vr$4 : Bertie the Bunyip writes: There's nothing made up about "No sparks, no power" I wouldn't buy one because of this. My club was looking at one ofr a Cherokee and decided against it because of the lack of limp home capability. What kind of sparks does a Diesel need? This ine has a FADEC. No electricity and you have a big weight up front. Worse, in the twin star installation, both engines are tied to an electrical system that can punch out both at the same time. in this case, when the gear was retracted... http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...FADEC-0-a.html Nice eh? To be fair, there was an immediate AD requiring a backup battery systtem to power the FADECs after that event. I'm surprised it wasn't required for certification in the first place since it appears to me that it was a forseeable failure mode, but still. There's lots of ways you can lose all electrics. Corrosion, lightning, poor maintenance... A manual reversion mode or at least a fail safe to a constant power setting weould be a major improvement and the ony thing that would make the engine a viable modern airplane engine in my view. I've flown single ignition airplanes, but there is a world of difference between flying an antique with low approahc speeds and a modern(ish) lightplane. Bertie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 6:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Peter Clark wrote : On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:24:52 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: David Lesher wrote in news:fp1t8e$8vr$4 : Bertie the Bunyip writes: There's nothing made up about "No sparks, no power" I wouldn't buy one because of this. My club was looking at one ofr a Cherokee and decided against it because of the lack of limp home capability. What kind of sparks does a Diesel need? This ine has a FADEC. No electricity and you have a big weight up front. Worse, in the twin star installation, both engines are tied to an electrical system that can punch out both at the same time. in this case, when the gear was retracted... http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...FADEC-0-a.html Nice eh? To be fair, there was an immediate AD requiring a backup battery systtem to power the FADECs after that event. *I'm surprised it wasn't required for certification in the first place since it appears to me that it was a forseeable failure mode, but still. There's lots of ways you can lose all electrics. Corrosion, lightning, poor maintenance... I agree. Isn't that a problem for electrical ignition systems? Limp home should be excellent in a diesel... Cheers |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WingFlaps wrote in
: On Feb 15, 6:46*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Peter Clark wrote innews:qav8r3 : On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:24:52 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: David Lesher wrote in news:fp1t8e$8vr$4 : Bertie the Bunyip writes: There's nothing made up about "No sparks, no power" I wouldn't buy one because of this. My club was looking at one ofr a Cherokee and decided against it because of the lack of limp home capability. What kind of sparks does a Diesel need? This ine has a FADEC. No electricity and you have a big weight up front. Worse, in the twin star installation, both engines are tied to an electrical system that can punch out both at the same time. in this case, when the gear was retracted... http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ate-1-FADEC-0- a.htm l Nice eh? To be fair, there was an immediate AD requiring a backup battery systtem to power the FADECs after that event. *I'm surprised it wasn't required for certification in the first place since it appears to me that it was a forseeable failure mode, but still. There's lots of ways you can lose all electrics. Corrosion, lightning, poor maintenance... I agree. Isn't that a problem for electrical ignition systems? Well, there are two mostly! Completely independent as well. Not the case here. You can add backup batteries and what not, but they're still connected to the same fadec. Limp home should be excellent in a diesel... Should be, but in this engine it is non-existent. It's not diesels in general I'm knocking. It's this engine only.. Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote x Should be, but in this engine it is non-existent. It's not diesels in general I'm knocking. It's this engine only.. Exactly. Limp home, or better, should be a no brainer for a diesel. The choice not to have that feature on this particular engine is, no doubt, an economic decision. They felt that the need for it, determined by the risk of failure, is not a large enough factor to necessitate the extra cost of including this feature. Perhaps they will survey possible buyers, or determine by some other vehicle, that this is an important reason for potential customers to not buy their package. Doubtful, but one can hope... As to losing the electrical supply to the fadec, only a poor design and implementation could result in a totally bulletproof and totally reliable system. The backup circuit and battery should supply only the fadec, and fuel pump; only the absolute minimum necessary systems needed to keep the fan turning. A self test should check the ability of the backup circuit to run these systems upon every start, and also if something changes during flight that would prevent the backup from functioning. Is that how it is now, with the only widely used diesel? No. It should not be difficult or overly costly to build a system to function like that. I guess we will have to wait for the experimental crowd to design such a system. g -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans,
The choice not to have that feature on this particular engine is, no doubt, an economic decision. No, no and no again. This is not the diesel Americans are used to from their boats and trucks. Modern car diesel engines require electronic control. Google common rail. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Morgans, The choice not to have that feature on this particular engine is, no doubt, an economic decision. No, no and no again. This is not the diesel Americans are used to from their boats and trucks. Modern car diesel engines require electronic control. common rail. I agree with Bertie., as to what you can go do to yourself. You are a pinhead, that thinks all Americans are ignorant, I guess. So go fyourself. I am quite familiar with modern electronic control on diesel engines. Could there have been an option to shut down the automatic injection, and go to a backup manual fuel control that lets the engine run at say, 80% ? You bet your ass, there could have been an option like that included. Why is it not included? Money. Economics. Period. Do I have to make that any clearer to you, since you are a European? Let me know if I have to simplify it for you. Not very nice to have someone talk down to you like this, is it? You should try not doing it to us, if you don't want it thrown back in your face. -- Jim in NC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:09:16 +0100, Thomas Borchert wrote:
This is not the diesel Americans are used to from their boats and trucks. What about the French? The SMA engine has a mechanical reversion when the ECU drops offline (for whatever reason). They call it a diesel engine, but perhaps they need a little education that it cannot be such if it can operate sans FADEC. And you can say what you want about the French, but anyone that comes up with the idea of soaking bread in egg before cooking has to be doing something right laugh. - Andrew |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew,
They call it a diesel engine, but perhaps they need a little education that it cannot be such if it can operate sans FADEC. Don't think I ever said something to that effect. The SMA is indeed an "old-style" diesel. It is also not quite a resounding success in the market. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie,
Not the case here. You can add backup batteries and what not, but they're still connected to the same fadec. There are two FADECs. Get yourself some factual information before spouting your theories! -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote in
: Bertie, Not the case here. You can add backup batteries and what not, but they're still connected to the same fadec. There are two FADECs. Get yourself some factual information before spouting your theories! It;'s not a theory and you know it.Both fadecs electric, are they? Bertie |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thielert (Diesel Engines) | Charles Talleyrand | Piloting | 108 | February 19th 08 04:59 PM |
diesel 160-200HP engines | geo | Home Built | 27 | April 2nd 04 04:27 PM |
Diesel engines for Planes Yahoo Group Jodel Diesel is Isuzu Citroen Peugeot | Roland M | Home Built | 3 | September 13th 03 12:44 AM |
Diesel engines for Planes Yahoo Group Jodel Diesel is Isuzu Citroen Peugeot | Roland M | General Aviation | 2 | September 13th 03 12:44 AM |
Diesel engines for Planes Yahoo Group Jodel Diesel is Isuzu Citroen Peugeot | Roland M | Rotorcraft | 2 | September 13th 03 12:44 AM |