![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sam Spade" wrote in message ... John Collins wrote: When an approach is loaded, it is appended to the flight plan after the destination airport. As stated earlier, the waypoints in the original flight plan will sequence normally until the destination airport is reached, at which time the 430 will navigate direct to the IAF waypoint and automatically "activate" the approach sequence. To cut to the chase, those of us familiar with using FMSes know to clear the destination airport from the flight plan once the approach is loaded. In a full-press FMS, this is known as a route-discontinuity. And, clearing that discontinuity in a full-press FMS or a Garmin panel mount will get it all to work as a flight plan with continuity. On a GNS430, activating the loaded approach is simpler. PROC, ENTER. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Prevost wrote:
"Sam Spade" wrote in message ... John Collins wrote: When an approach is loaded, it is appended to the flight plan after the destination airport. As stated earlier, the waypoints in the original flight plan will sequence normally until the destination airport is reached, at which time the 430 will navigate direct to the IAF waypoint and automatically "activate" the approach sequence. To cut to the chase, those of us familiar with using FMSes know to clear the destination airport from the flight plan once the approach is loaded. In a full-press FMS, this is known as a route-discontinuity. And, clearing that discontinuity in a full-press FMS or a Garmin panel mount will get it all to work as a flight plan with continuity. On a GNS430, activating the loaded approach is simpler. PROC, ENTER. Like many things, there is more than one way to skin the cat with a Garmin. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Prevost wrote:
"Sam Spade" wrote in message ... John Collins wrote: When an approach is loaded, it is appended to the flight plan after the destination airport. As stated earlier, the waypoints in the original flight plan will sequence normally until the destination airport is reached, at which time the 430 will navigate direct to the IAF waypoint and automatically "activate" the approach sequence. To cut to the chase, those of us familiar with using FMSes know to clear the destination airport from the flight plan once the approach is loaded. In a full-press FMS, this is known as a route-discontinuity. And, clearing that discontinuity in a full-press FMS or a Garmin panel mount will get it all to work as a flight plan with continuity. On a GNS430, activating the loaded approach is simpler. PROC, ENTER. I took another look at it and disagree. Once the IAP is selected removing the airport can be done prior to a critical phase of flight, then everything sequences without pilot intervention. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sam Spade" wrote in message ... Stan Prevost wrote: "Sam Spade" wrote in message ... John Collins wrote: When an approach is loaded, it is appended to the flight plan after the destination airport. As stated earlier, the waypoints in the original flight plan will sequence normally until the destination airport is reached, at which time the 430 will navigate direct to the IAF waypoint and automatically "activate" the approach sequence. To cut to the chase, those of us familiar with using FMSes know to clear the destination airport from the flight plan once the approach is loaded. In a full-press FMS, this is known as a route-discontinuity. And, clearing that discontinuity in a full-press FMS or a Garmin panel mount will get it all to work as a flight plan with continuity. On a GNS430, activating the loaded approach is simpler. PROC, ENTER. I took another look at it and disagree. Once the IAP is selected removing the airport can be done prior to a critical phase of flight, then everything sequences without pilot intervention. FPL, push small knob to get cursor, scroll down to airport, CLR, ENTER to confirm, FPL to get back to NAV page. vs PROC, ENTER. And if you have to change approaches, which sometimes happens, you can't select a new one without a destination airport. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Prevost wrote:
FPL, push small knob to get cursor, scroll down to airport, CLR, ENTER to confirm, FPL to get back to NAV page. vs PROC, ENTER. True enough. But, the bit of extra stuff earlier on is none the less easier and I don't have to worry about making sure I am where I am supposed to be if I "activate." And if you have to change approaches, which sometimes happens, you can't select a new one without a destination airport. It is rare to fly the full approach in a TRACON environment. But, if it is a single approach in each direction, you will usually still know early on. If it is a major airport then all bets are off, so I would wait until the vectors begin, then do it your way, but with VTF. However, if the airport has runway specific STARs, then there is another level of complexity, which can easily overwhelm single-pilot operations. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sam Spade" wrote in message ... Stan Prevost wrote: FPL, push small knob to get cursor, scroll down to airport, CLR, ENTER to confirm, FPL to get back to NAV page. vs PROC, ENTER. True enough. But, the bit of extra stuff earlier on is none the less easier and I don't have to worry about making sure I am where I am supposed to be if I "activate." And if you have to change approaches, which sometimes happens, you can't select a new one without a destination airport. John Collins informed me, and I confirmed on the sim, that if you delete the destination airport waypoint from the flight plan, and then need to select a different approach, the 430 will assume the former destination airport and will allow you to select a new procedure at that airport. It is rare to fly the full approach in a TRACON environment. But, if it is a single approach in each direction, you will usually still know early on. I don't find that it is rare to fly an RNAV approach from an IAF at a satellite airport served by a TRACON (yes at the primary airport). VOR approaches or others with PTs, yes, but not Basic T and TAA GPS approaches. But it is not too uncommon for an airport or runway to be turned around after you have been told what approach to expect. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sam Spade" wrote in message ... Stan Prevost wrote: FPL, push small knob to get cursor, scroll down to airport, CLR, ENTER to confirm, FPL to get back to NAV page. vs PROC, ENTER. True enough. But, the bit of extra stuff earlier on is none the less easier and I don't have to worry about making sure I am where I am supposed to be if I "activate." (and from another post) I took another look at it and disagree. Once the IAP is selected removing the airport can be done prior to a critical phase of flight, then everything sequences without pilot intervention Sam, I have reread your posts trying to make sure I understand your points. First of all, I didn't know the Garmins would self-activate, so that is something new I have learned from this thread. More on that later. I understand that you prefer to perform a more complex task rather than a two-button-task if you can move the task to a less busy period of the flight. But the "without pilot intervention" part only happens if you were already direct to the IAF at the time you deleted the airport waypoint, or deleted the airport waypoint to make the navigator sequence to the IAF when instructed to proceed direct to the IAF. Either way, it is the same result as the simpler activation procedure performed at the same point in time. If that is not true, then I am missing something in the scenario. Perhaps a simple example would help. As far as I can determine, the self-activation feature is not mentioned in the Garmin manuals. I believe another poster said the same. Personally, I am a bit uneasy about using undocumented "features" of software in critical situations. For one thing, we don't really know what is happening and if it has even been tested. Does it do the required RAIM predictions prior to the FAF? How would you know, unless it fails? Does this "feature" work under all conditions? Another thing, you don't know if the "feature" will still exist, or work the same way, if the software is updated. I wonder what the response would be if one called Garmin and asked if they approve using the navigator this way? Or the FAA? Stan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 2/17/2008 4:54 PM, Stan Prevost wrote the following: snip I wonder what the response would be if one called Garmin and asked if they approve using the navigator this way? Try it! I have had extremely good luck with Garmin tech support transferring me to very knowledgeable people when I had something besides the usual RTFM questions. My guess is that the manuals are the problem and that the behavior is in the design spec. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mitty" wrote in message ... On 2/17/2008 4:54 PM, Stan Prevost wrote the following: snip I wonder what the response would be if one called Garmin and asked if they approve using the navigator this way? Try it! I have had extremely good luck with Garmin tech support transferring me to very knowledgeable people when I had something besides the usual RTFM questions. My guess is that the manuals are the problem and that the behavior is in the design spec. I would call them if I understood why I might have anything to gain from doing so. I don't yet understand how using the undocumented self-activation "feature" helps anything. Stan |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, let me posit a scenario.
Flight Plan: KABC WPTA WPTB WPTC KDEF After passing WPTB, I either conclude on my own that APPRCH 1 to KDEF is what I expect, or I am told to expect it. So I select APPRCH1, from IAF1, and load it. Now the flight plan is KABC WPTA WPTB WPTC KDEF IAF1 IF FAF MAP MAHP. I delete the destination airport which causes a discontinuity (lots of buttons and knobs): KABC WPTA WPTB WPTC IAF1 IF FAF MAP MAHP. Now I am still flying with WPTC as the TO waypoint, with the next waypoint being IAF1. Now, Case 1: I continue flying to WPTC, on passing it the machine sequences to IAF1. But I have not been cleared to IAF1, I am still cleared to KDEF. Problem. Requires unexpected actions. I have to fix it by entering direct to a waypoint not in the flight plan. Lots of button/knob actions. I'm too lazy to type it all in. Case 2: Before reaching WPTC, I am cleared direct to IAF1. Requires pilot intervention: FPL, press small button to get cursor, scroll down using large knob to IAF1, Direct, Enter, Enter, FPL. Or, FPL, press small button to get cursor, scroll down using large knob to WPTC, CLR, ENTER, FPL. Case 3: I continue flying original flight plan, navigator continues to sequence along cleared flight plan until I am cleared to fly direct IAF1. PROC, ENTER, done. Case 4: I figure that I will get Vectors To Final. So I load the approach, with an IAF selected or with VTF selected. I delete the destination airport waypoint. After passing the last enroute waypoint, the machine will sequence to the IAF, if any, or to the FAF, if VTF. Is its action consistent with my clearance at that point? As opposed to: upon receiving the first vector, press PROC, ENTER (if VTF was loaded, otherwise scroll to the VTF option on the menu and ENTER). Do these scenarios miss the point? Stan "Stan Prevost" wrote in message ... "Sam Spade" wrote in message ... Stan Prevost wrote: FPL, push small knob to get cursor, scroll down to airport, CLR, ENTER to confirm, FPL to get back to NAV page. vs PROC, ENTER. True enough. But, the bit of extra stuff earlier on is none the less easier and I don't have to worry about making sure I am where I am supposed to be if I "activate." (and from another post) I took another look at it and disagree. Once the IAP is selected removing the airport can be done prior to a critical phase of flight, then everything sequences without pilot intervention Sam, I have reread your posts trying to make sure I understand your points. First of all, I didn't know the Garmins would self-activate, so that is something new I have learned from this thread. More on that later. I understand that you prefer to perform a more complex task rather than a two-button-task if you can move the task to a less busy period of the flight. But the "without pilot intervention" part only happens if you were already direct to the IAF at the time you deleted the airport waypoint, or deleted the airport waypoint to make the navigator sequence to the IAF when instructed to proceed direct to the IAF. Either way, it is the same result as the simpler activation procedure performed at the same point in time. If that is not true, then I am missing something in the scenario. Perhaps a simple example would help. As far as I can determine, the self-activation feature is not mentioned in the Garmin manuals. I believe another poster said the same. Personally, I am a bit uneasy about using undocumented "features" of software in critical situations. For one thing, we don't really know what is happening and if it has even been tested. Does it do the required RAIM predictions prior to the FAF? How would you know, unless it fails? Does this "feature" work under all conditions? Another thing, you don't know if the "feature" will still exist, or work the same way, if the software is updated. I wonder what the response would be if one called Garmin and asked if they approve using the navigator this way? Or the FAA? Stan |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Video clip of an "interesting" final approach & landing | Elmo von Thud | Aviation Photos | 3 | October 7th 07 12:54 AM |
Friday 072707 in Oshkosh Pt 1 - the Raptor [06/30] - "F22 Flyby approach close 2.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 29th 07 06:36 AM |
Friday 072707 in Oshkosh Pt 1 - the Raptor [05/30] - "F22 Flyby approach close 1.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 29th 07 06:36 AM |
Has Anyone Used The "Approach Sport Hub Avionics Wiring Systems"? | three-eight-hotel | Owning | 7 | June 1st 06 03:28 PM |
"End of an era: USN's Tomcats make their final approach before decommissioning" | Mike | Naval Aviation | 15 | April 5th 06 03:45 AM |