![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
See Jay, Size DOES matter. :-) Mary telling you any different doesn't count! P.S. It's not just the girth...the length (of the cabin) is also something to envy. As is the second door (which passengers don't have to climb up on the wing to get into) and the front baggage compartment. Admit it Jay, you have Piper envy. No, no, no, Ray. Only Cezzzna drivers have Piper envy! ;-) About twice a year I would really, really like a Six. Oshkosh and Sun N Fun, basically. The other 98 flights, hauling that pig around would truly be wasted on our little family. Jay, probably 2/3rds of my flights are solo in the Six. Yeah, it is pulling around a lot of airframe to do that, but still cheaper than owning another airplane. Yup, I'm spoiled. Worth the 15% extra fuel burn to me. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray Andraka wrote:
Jay Honeck wrote: See Jay, Size DOES matter. :-) Mary telling you any different doesn't count! P.S. It's not just the girth...the length (of the cabin) is also something to envy. As is the second door (which passengers don't have to climb up on the wing to get into) and the front baggage compartment. Admit it Jay, you have Piper envy. No, no, no, Ray. Only Cezzzna drivers have Piper envy! ;-) About twice a year I would really, really like a Six. Oshkosh and Sun N Fun, basically. The other 98 flights, hauling that pig around would truly be wasted on our little family. Jay, probably 2/3rds of my flights are solo in the Six. Yeah, it is pulling around a lot of airframe to do that, but still cheaper than owning another airplane. Yup, I'm spoiled. Worth the 15% extra fuel burn to me. One could always fly slower to get the fuel burn closer to a 4-pax airplane, but does anyone every really do this? Matt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One could always fly slower to get the fuel burn closer to a 4-pax
airplane, but does anyone every really do this? I always *say* I can do this, with our 6-cylinder O-540, and technically I can. Shoot, I can lean it all the way back to 8 gph, and fly at C-150 speeds. Do I? Hell, no! I cruise at 140 knots, at 15 gph. The only time I throttle back to 10 gph is when I'm flying with friends in their 172s or Warriors as a flight of 2 or 3. The rest of the time, I like to go faster -- even though it makes little sense to do so. Human nature, I guess. Or, just plain dumb... ;-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay Honeck wrote: Do I? Hell, no! I cruise at 140 knots, at 15 gph. Ouch. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
Jay Honeck wrote: Do I? Hell, no! I cruise at 140 knots, at 15 gph. Ouch. Jay, I thought book cruise fuel burn for a 235 was about 12 GPH. Why are you burning 15? Book for my Six is 14 GPH, and I would be getting that if I wasn't fighting the front two cylinders running so lean with WOT. Sounds to me like a move up to a Six wouldn't be as painful as you made it out to be the other day. So are we going to see you show up at OSH in a six this year then? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sure. I'll pick him up on my way... :-D
"Ray Andraka" wrote in message ... Newps wrote: Jay Honeck wrote: Do I? Hell, no! I cruise at 140 knots, at 15 gph. Ouch. Jay, I thought book cruise fuel burn for a 235 was about 12 GPH. Why are you burning 15? Book for my Six is 14 GPH, and I would be getting that if I wasn't fighting the front two cylinders running so lean with WOT. Sounds to me like a move up to a Six wouldn't be as painful as you made it out to be the other day. So are we going to see you show up at OSH in a six this year then? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ray Andraka wrote: Newps wrote: Jay Honeck wrote: Do I? Hell, no! I cruise at 140 knots, at 15 gph. Ouch. Jay, I thought book cruise fuel burn for a 235 was about 12 GPH. Why are you burning 15? Book for my Six is 14 GPH, and I would be getting that if I wasn't fighting the front two cylinders running so lean with WOT. Sounds to me like a move up to a Six wouldn't be as painful as you made it out to be the other day. So are we going to see you show up at OSH in a six this year then? Running 15 gph for a 235 hp engine is a colossal waste of gas at cruise speed. My 285 hp engine(IO-520) gets 75% at 14 gph. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
Ray Andraka wrote: Newps wrote: Jay Honeck wrote: Do I? Hell, no! I cruise at 140 knots, at 15 gph. Ouch. Jay, I thought book cruise fuel burn for a 235 was about 12 GPH. Why are you burning 15? Book for my Six is 14 GPH, and I would be getting that if I wasn't fighting the front two cylinders running so lean with WOT. Sounds to me like a move up to a Six wouldn't be as painful as you made it out to be the other day. So are we going to see you show up at OSH in a six this year then? Running 15 gph for a 235 hp engine is a colossal waste of gas at cruise speed. My 285 hp engine(IO-520) gets 75% at 14 gph. Book burn for my 260 hp O-540 is 14 gph. Both mine and Jay's are carbureted, so we end up with a wider spread between cylinders, which in turn means we lean to the leanest cylinder and accept the fuel burns of the others. I've currently got an issue I am trying to track down with mine that is making the front two cylinders reach peak EGT some 270-300 degrees before the others, which in turn is making my fuel burn close to 19gph (no, it isn't an induction leak, we've pressurized the intake and checked it, plus the problem is most noticible at WOT on cold days. If it were an intake leak, it would be accentuated at lower throttle settings rather than higher ones). Previously, I used to get EGT spreads around 150 deg and was getting fuel burns pretty close to the 14gph book value. I don't know why Jay is burning 25% more than book, and am curious if he knows why (or maybe it was a typo?). |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
One could always fly slower to get the fuel burn closer to a 4-pax airplane, but does anyone every really do this? I always *say* I can do this, with our 6-cylinder O-540, and technically I can. Shoot, I can lean it all the way back to 8 gph, and fly at C-150 speeds. Do I? Hell, no! I cruise at 140 knots, at 15 gph. Lean, grasshopper, lean! Matt |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do I? Hell, no! I cruise at 140 knots, at 15 gph.
Lean, grasshopper, lean! Snort! That *is* leaned. At take-off, we'll be around 24+ gph... :-) I read about these LSAs flying around at 120 knots on 3 gph, and start salivating. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bird Dog | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 21st 07 12:41 PM |
Try this bird man | Greg Siemon | Home Built | 3 | January 15th 07 03:17 PM |
I Want My Own Bird | Yeah_right | Owning | 72 | October 18th 04 02:25 PM |
T Bird - | ZackGSD | Home Built | 1 | December 15th 03 01:47 PM |