![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message ... Yangooooo.....listen.... Then nudge yoke foward. If the landing is super Why would you have to "nudge" the yoke forward unless you're carrying too much airspeed? In a proper Cessna 152 landing, you're pulling the yoke back as you bleed off airspeed in order to ease the nosewheel down. There's no forward nudging. The nose is going to come down eventually no matter what. Previously you wrote: At the moment before touch-down push the yoke easy forward and I do a 3 point landing That puts undue stress on the nosewheel, especially in a soft-terrain environment. Published procedure is to hold the nosewheel off for as long as possible (which is done by pulling back on the yoke) and ease it to the ground as gently as possible. -c |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"gatt" wrote in
: "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message . .. Yangooooo.....listen.... Then nudge yoke foward. If the landing is super Why would you have to "nudge" the yoke forward unless you're carrying too much airspeed? To recover from th eflat spin you did on approach , of course. Bertie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... Then nudge yoke foward. If the landing is super Why would you have to "nudge" the yoke forward unless you're carrying too much airspeed? To recover from th eflat spin you did on approach , of course. Oh, yes, how could I forget? Whenever I do a flat spin on approach, I just cover my hands and scream. Alternatively, if you throw in full power at exactly the right moment, hey... 3 point landing! -c |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"gatt" wrote in news:13ruaeoim1cnn06
@corp.supernews.com: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... Then nudge yoke foward. If the landing is super Why would you have to "nudge" the yoke forward unless you're carrying too much airspeed? To recover from th eflat spin you did on approach , of course. Oh, yes, how could I forget? Whenever I do a flat spin on approach, I just cover my hands and scream. Alternatively, if you throw in full power at exactly the right moment, hey... 3 point landing! I'm looking forward to seeing him perform on the airshow circuit. bertie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 22, 10:20 am, "gatt" wrote:
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in ... Yangooooo.....listen.... Then nudge yoke foward. If the landing is super Why would you have to "nudge" the yoke forward unless you're carrying too much airspeed? In a proper Cessna 152 landing, you're pulling the yoke back as you bleed off airspeed in order to ease the nosewheel down. There's no forward nudging. The nose is going to come down eventually no matter what. Previously you wrote: At the moment before touch-down push the yoke easy forward and I do a 3 point landing That puts undue stress on the nosewheel, especially in a soft-terrain environment. Published procedure is to hold the nosewheel off for as long as possible (which is done by pulling back on the yoke) and ease it to the ground as gently as possible. FWIW, I definitely agree, I'm talking about hitting pavement. It's the ground-effect that can keep the plane floating, that is a mysterious effect (not really well understood) that does happen at landings, but can be used to advantage, if you're not a *fraidy cat*. Once the rolling air from ground effect is achieved, a new dynamic is effective. Of course that "rolling air" needs AoA to be maintained, so nudging forward kills the "ground effect" and you're very near a 3 point landing. Maybe you guys want to analyse "ground effect lift". Ken |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
On Feb 22, 10:20 am, "gatt" wrote: "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in ... Yangooooo.....listen.... Then nudge yoke foward. If the landing is super Why would you have to "nudge" the yoke forward unless you're carrying too much airspeed? In a proper Cessna 152 landing, you're pulling the yoke back as you bleed off airspeed in order to ease the nosewheel down. There's no forward nudging. The nose is going to come down eventually no matter what. Previously you wrote: At the moment before touch-down push the yoke easy forward and I do a 3 point landing That puts undue stress on the nosewheel, especially in a soft-terrain environment. Published procedure is to hold the nosewheel off for as long as possible (which is done by pulling back on the yoke) and ease it to the ground as gently as possible. FWIW, I definitely agree, I'm talking about hitting pavement. It's the ground-effect that can keep the plane floating, that is a mysterious effect (not really well understood) that does happen at landings, but can be used to advantage, if you're not a *fraidy cat*. Once the rolling air from ground effect is achieved, a new dynamic is effective. Of course that "rolling air" needs AoA to be maintained, so nudging forward kills the "ground effect" and you're very near a 3 point landing. Maybe you guys want to analyse "ground effect lift". Ken Good Grief!! I swear you're turning me into Charlie Brown, Ken. :-) -- Dudley Henriques |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ken ****head Tucker" wrote in
: FWIW, I definitely agree, I'm talking about hitting pavement. It's the ground-effect that can keep the plane floating, that is a mysterious effect (not really well understood) that does happen at landings, but can be used to advantage, if you're not a *fraidy cat*. Once the rolling air from ground effect is achieved, a new dynamic is effective. Of course that "rolling air" needs AoA to be maintained, so nudging forward kills the "ground effect" and you're very near a 3 point landing. Maybe you guys want to analyse "ground effect lift". Ken YOU don't know **** from Shineola when it comes to ground effect. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Benjamin Dover writes:
YOU don't know **** from Shineola when it comes to ground effect. Since neither has anything to do with ground effect, why would that be a problem? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in
: On Feb 22, 10:20 am, "gatt" wrote: "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in messagenews:1d524c70-22a0-483c-9b1f-c9c179fb6815 @e10g2000prf.googlegro ups.com... Yangooooo.....listen.... Then nudge yoke foward. If the landing is super Why would you have to "nudge" the yoke forward unless you're carrying too much airspeed? In a proper Cessna 152 landing, you're pulling the yoke back as you bleed off airspeed in order to ease the nosewheel down. There's no forward nudging. The nose is going to come down eventually no matter what. Previously you wrote: At the moment before touch-down push the yoke easy forward and I do a 3 point landing That puts undue stress on the nosewheel, especially in a soft-terrain environment. Published procedure is to hold the nosewheel off for as long as possible (which is done by pulling back on the yoke) and ease it to the ground as gently as possible. FWIW, I definitely agree, FWIW? That'd be the value of the dust bunnies under my couch and the dog's worn out chewie frog, I beleive. I'm talking about hitting pavement. Hey, you must be a reeeeel pile-it iffin you can talk lke that! It's the ground-effect that can keep the plane floating, that is a mysterious effect (not really well understood) Hey, the whole world is one big mystery to you Kennie! But wait, if you understand how to land a Starfighter on a carrier, then you must understand ground effect. that does happen at landings, but can be used to advantage, if you're not a *fraidy cat*. Once the rolling air from ground effect is achieved, a new dynamic is effective. Of course that "rolling air" needs AoA to be maintained, so nudging forward kills the "ground effect" and you're very near a 3 point landing. Maybe you guys want to analyse "ground effect lift". I can think of several things that the Mounties should be analysing right about now. Bertie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 22, 2:35 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
FWIW, I definitely agree, I'm talking about hitting pavement. It's the ground-effect that can keep the plane floating, that is a mysterious effect (not really well understood) that does happen at landings, but can be used to advantage, if you're not a *fraidy cat*. Once the rolling air from ground effect is achieved, a new dynamic is effective. Of course that "rolling air" needs AoA to be maintained, so nudging forward kills the "ground effect" and you're very near a 3 point landing. Maybe you guys want to analyse "ground effect lift". Ken Ground effect is not a mystery to those who have taken groundschools and have licenses. It's mystery to simulated "pilots." Ground effect was well understood by aerodynamicists a long time ago, and it's been explained in the textbooks since then. Lowering the nose just before touchdown just reduces AOA so that the airplane thumps onto the runway. It's not going to squeak on. It's sloppy and stupid and damages things. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stall Recovery | Danny Deger | Piloting | 12 | January 30th 07 01:01 AM |
stall strips ??? | Tri-Pacer | Owning | 6 | December 8th 06 06:18 PM |
Bad place to stall | Stubby | Piloting | 23 | June 21st 05 04:10 PM |
Wing Stall | PaulaJay1 | Owning | 18 | December 11th 03 07:46 PM |
Stall resistant 172? | Roger Long | Piloting | 19 | October 18th 03 11:48 PM |