![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
On Feb 25, 9:33 am, wrote: I didn't think Dan, I agree with that. you had any licenses. You either never earned one, or they took it from you because you were a menace to everyone. When I got my license, I did of course read the Aeronautical Act (canux), and there were no circumstances to have the license revoked. Go read the Act sonny, and get back to us. Ken PS: You don not understand the system. Obviously we don't understand the system. ANY system that allowed you a pilot's certificate is quite frankly beyond our meager ability to understand. :-) -- Dudley Henriques |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 26, 8:28 am, Dudley Henriques wrote:
Obviously we don't understand the system. ANY system that allowed you a pilot's certificate is quite frankly beyond our meager ability to understand. :-) Yup. All a group of dummies like us can do is fly aeroplanes and hold the licenses and rating that are required ... Is Ken the alterego of Mixedup? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in news:91159c92-dd52-4dbd- : On Feb 25, 9:33 am, wrote: I didn't think Dan, I agree with that. you had any licenses. You either never earned one, or they took it from you because you were a menace to everyone. When I got my license, I did of course read the Aeronautical Act (canux), and there were no circumstances to have the license revoked. Go read the Act sonny, and get back to us. Ken PS: You don not understand the system. So now we know. A Cheerios lah-since is bulletproof. Bertie Well, you have to admit; a Cheerios box top can make a paper airplane! :-) -- Dudley Henriques |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 25, 11:23 am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
On Feb 25, 9:33 am, wrote: I didn't think Dan, I agree with that. you had any licenses. You either never earned one, or they took it from you because you were a menace to everyone. When I got my license, I did of course read the Aeronautical Act (canux), and there were no circumstances to have the license revoked. Go read the Act sonny, and get back to us. Ken PS: You don not understand the system. No, YOU don't know anything. If we have a look at the Aeronautics Act at http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/Re...ct/Nov2007.htm we will see this little item: 6.8 In addition to any grounds referred to in any of sections 4.4, 6.71, 6.9 to 7.1 and 7.21, the Minister may suspend, cancel or refuse to issue, renew or amend a Canadian aviation document in the circumstances and on the grounds prescribed by regulation of the Governor in Council. And if we have a look at the Canadian Aviation Regulations, referred to above by "regulation of the Governor in Council" he http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/Re...103.htm#103_01 We will read thus: 103.06 (1) A notice issued by the Minister pursuant to subsections 6.9(1) and (2) of the Act shall include (a) a description of the particulars of the alleged contravention; (b) where the Minister has decided to suspend the Canadian aviation document, a statement of the duration of the suspension; and (c) a statement that a request for review by the Tribunal does not operate as a stay of the suspension or cancellation but that an application may be made in writing to the Tribunal, pursuant to subsection 6.9(4) of the Act, to stay the suspension or cancellation until the review of the decision of the Minister has been concluded. (2) A notice issued by the Minister pursuant to subsections 7(1) and (2) of the Act shall include (a) a statement of the effective date of the suspension; (b) a statement of the conditions under which the suspension is terminated; and (c) a statement that a request for review by the Tribunal does not operate as a stay of the suspension. (3) A notice issued by the Minister pursuant to subsections 7.1(1) and (2) of the Act shall include (a) where the Minister has decided to suspend or cancel a Canadian aviation document, a statement of the effective date of the suspension or cancellation; (b) where the Minister has decided to suspend the Canadian aviation document, a statement of the duration of the suspension or the conditions under which the suspension is terminated; and (c) a statement that a request for review by the Tribunal does not operate as a stay of the suspension, cancellation or refusal to renew. (4) A notice issued by the Minister under subsection 6.71(2) of the Act informing an applicant or an owner or operator of an aircraft, aerodrome, airport or other facility of the Minister's decision made under subsection 6.71(1) of the Act to refuse to issue or amend a Canadian aviation document in respect of the aircraft, aerodrome, airport or other facility shall be in the form set out in Schedule I to this Subpart. (amended 2004/05/11; no previous version) Administrative Grounds for Suspension, Cancellation or Refusal to Renew 103.07 In addition to the grounds referred to in Sections 6.9 to 7.1 of the Act, the Minister may suspend, cancel or refuse to renew a Canadian aviation document where (a) the Canadian aviation document has been voluntarily surrendered to the Minister by its holder; (b) he Canadian aviation document has been mutilated, altered, or rendered illegible; (c) the aircraft in respect of which the Canadian aviation document was issued has been destroyed or withdrawn from use; or (d) the commercial air service, other service or undertaking in respect of which the Canadian aviation document was issued has been discontinued. In Canada, Ken, "cancellation" means revocation. Lost forever. I still believe you don't have any licenses. Dan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 25, 11:32 am, wrote:
On Feb 25, 11:23 am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote: On Feb 25, 9:33 am, wrote: I didn't think Dan, I agree with that. you had any licenses. You either never earned one, or they took it from you because you were a menace to everyone. When I got my license, I did of course read the Aeronautical Act (canux), and there were no circumstances to have the license revoked. Go read the Act sonny, and get back to us. Ken PS: You don not understand the system. No, YOU don't know anything. If we have a look at the Aeronautics Act athttp://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/Regserv/Affairs/AeronauticsAct/Nov2... we will see this little item: 6.8 In addition to any grounds referred to in any of sections 4.4, 6.71, 6.9 to 7.1 and 7.21, the Minister may suspend, cancel or refuse to issue, renew or amend a Canadian aviation document in the circumstances and on the grounds prescribed by regulation of the Governor in Council. And if we have a look at the Canadian Aviation Regulations, referred to above by "regulation of the Governor in Council" he http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/Re...Part1/103.htm#... We will read thus: 103.06 (1) A notice issued by the Minister pursuant to subsections 6.9(1) and (2) of the Act shall include (a) a description of the particulars of the alleged contravention; (b) where the Minister has decided to suspend the Canadian aviation document, a statement of the duration of the suspension; and (c) a statement that a request for review by the Tribunal does not operate as a stay of the suspension or cancellation but that an application may be made in writing to the Tribunal, pursuant to subsection 6.9(4) of the Act, to stay the suspension or cancellation until the review of the decision of the Minister has been concluded. (2) A notice issued by the Minister pursuant to subsections 7(1) and (2) of the Act shall include (a) a statement of the effective date of the suspension; (b) a statement of the conditions under which the suspension is terminated; and (c) a statement that a request for review by the Tribunal does not operate as a stay of the suspension. (3) A notice issued by the Minister pursuant to subsections 7.1(1) and (2) of the Act shall include (a) where the Minister has decided to suspend or cancel a Canadian aviation document, a statement of the effective date of the suspension or cancellation; (b) where the Minister has decided to suspend the Canadian aviation document, a statement of the duration of the suspension or the conditions under which the suspension is terminated; and (c) a statement that a request for review by the Tribunal does not operate as a stay of the suspension, cancellation or refusal to renew. (4) A notice issued by the Minister under subsection 6.71(2) of the Act informing an applicant or an owner or operator of an aircraft, aerodrome, airport or other facility of the Minister's decision made under subsection 6.71(1) of the Act to refuse to issue or amend a Canadian aviation document in respect of the aircraft, aerodrome, airport or other facility shall be in the form set out in Schedule I to this Subpart. (amended 2004/05/11; no previous version) Administrative Grounds for Suspension, Cancellation or Refusal to Renew 103.07 In addition to the grounds referred to in Sections 6.9 to 7.1 of the Act, the Minister may suspend, cancel or refuse to renew a Canadian aviation document where (a) the Canadian aviation document has been voluntarily surrendered to the Minister by its holder; (b) he Canadian aviation document has been mutilated, altered, or rendered illegible; (c) the aircraft in respect of which the Canadian aviation document was issued has been destroyed or withdrawn from use; or (d) the commercial air service, other service or undertaking in respect of which the Canadian aviation document was issued has been discontinued. In Canada, Ken, "cancellation" means revocation. Lost forever. No, you need to understand retro-activity of law. yawn, you don't understand the system. Besides, who gives a *flying ***** about about a bunch of suck up govmonk workers suckin bucks from us. The canuck govmonkery is so corrupt, anyone who goes along with that system is a *cock-sucker*, be their guest....LOL... Ken |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message ... Yangooooo.....listen.... Then nudge yoke foward. If the landing is super Why would you have to "nudge" the yoke forward unless you're carrying too much airspeed? In a proper Cessna 152 landing, you're pulling the yoke back as you bleed off airspeed in order to ease the nosewheel down. There's no forward nudging. The nose is going to come down eventually no matter what. Previously you wrote: At the moment before touch-down push the yoke easy forward and I do a 3 point landing That puts undue stress on the nosewheel, especially in a soft-terrain environment. Published procedure is to hold the nosewheel off for as long as possible (which is done by pulling back on the yoke) and ease it to the ground as gently as possible. -c |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"gatt" wrote in
: "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message . .. Yangooooo.....listen.... Then nudge yoke foward. If the landing is super Why would you have to "nudge" the yoke forward unless you're carrying too much airspeed? To recover from th eflat spin you did on approach , of course. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stall Recovery | Danny Deger | Piloting | 12 | January 30th 07 01:01 AM |
stall strips ??? | Tri-Pacer | Owning | 6 | December 8th 06 06:18 PM |
Bad place to stall | Stubby | Piloting | 23 | June 21st 05 04:10 PM |
Wing Stall | PaulaJay1 | Owning | 18 | December 11th 03 07:46 PM |
Stall resistant 172? | Roger Long | Piloting | 19 | October 18th 03 11:48 PM |