![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Maxwell" wrote in
: "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... Jay Honeck wrote: I never dug deep to find out why. I can only suppose they didn't want to lose an airplane AND a building. That's the rule here, too. We can have it parked right in front of the hangar but no part of the airplane can be across the door threshold. I assume it is for the reason you state. Our FBO routinely fuels owner's aircraft in their hangars. Always has. Ten years ago, when we first moved into a hangar, we would return from a flight, put the plane away, and flip a little red flapper up on the door. Next time we came to the airport, the flapper was down, the plane was fully fueled, and we'd get a bill at the end of the month. God, I miss those days... I think gas was, like, $1.74 per gallon -- and we bitched about it! ELM, which is only 30 or so miles from where I live, lost a maintenance hangar, 4 airplanes and lots of tools and spare parts due to a fueling accident with an airplane inside the hangar. With the fuel spreading across the floor, once it was ignited the hangar went up almost instantly. Nobody was seriously injured, but even with the airport fire department literally next door, the hangar was a total loss. What was the fuel doing on the floor, and what ignited it? This is one rule that I believe is grounded in common sense. I believe this is one rule that is grounded in common nonsense, and/or simple negative fantasy. If your refueling procedure allows ANY chance of fire, or even significant spill, that procedure needs to be changed immediately. Even aircraft tied down on a flight line are MUCH too close to each other to afford a fire. If we have any concerns of aircraft stored indoors, then we need to be completely defueling them prior to storage or maintenance, just like the airlines do. It would be just as easy to argue leaving fuel in an aircraft while stored indoors is an unacceptable hazard as well. Then if a fire does get started in the hanger, the aircraft is much less likely to contribute to the problem. There are a lot of factors in play during refueling that are not with fuel at rest. One is the static charge induced by merely moving the fuel down the hose, the vapor produced by pumping and the possible concentration to a good ignition mixture in an enclosed space. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Death? | Ol Shy & Bashful | Rotorcraft | 10 | July 9th 06 12:31 AM |
The death of the A-65? | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 35 | November 23rd 05 12:08 AM |
death of GA in NY | [email protected] | Piloting | 51 | September 16th 05 11:36 PM |