![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message
... "Gregg Germain" wrote in message ... :: There are lots of P51s out there, so they are not rare enough. :: Further, they are said to be even harder to fly than normal for :: vintage and type. : : Where does it say P-51's are hard to fly? Or harder to fly than : "normal"? I'm curious as to how the conclusion was reached - it's certainly harder to fly than a Cessna 152, but not nearly as hard to fly as the space shuttle. I'm assuming he compared them to aircraft contemporary with the P-51 since he used the word "vintage". Was it harder to fly than the P-39? the 39 has some tough spin characteristics. Other than the 51 being somewhat less stable when the aft gas tank was full, I don't know of any other difficult characteristics. Just curious what he meant by "harder". I've read three things. The p51 is unstable in pitch with full tanks and the resulting aft CG, and that a p51 has a high speed stall that's tougher than most other WWII fighters. And finally the p51 has a higher stall speed than other contemporary fighters. I myself have no idea, and will defer to people with actual knowledge. But this is the scuttle-butt around this household. The P-51 is a little more unforgiving than some other WWII fighters because of it's high speed laminar-flow wing - this gives it speed and range, at the cost of a more 'sudden' wing stall and a higher stall speed. The Spitfire is more forgiving to fly because, due to a design quirk, it's airframe actually gives a little shudder to warn you you're near a wing stall state. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"killfile" wrote: The P-51 is a little more unforgiving than some other WWII fighters because of it's high speed laminar-flow wing - this gives it speed and range, at the cost of a more 'sudden' wing stall and a higher stall speed. The Spitfire is more forgiving to fly because, due to a design quirk, it's airframe actually gives a little shudder to warn you you're near a wing stall state. I've never flown a Spitfire, but if you miss the buffet on a Mustang you must be brain-dead. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Military & vintage warbird slides for sale | Wings Of Fury | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 10th 04 01:17 AM |
FA: 5 Airplane Model Kits - Bomber, Jet, Warbird | Disgo | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 22nd 04 05:00 PM |
FS: Aircraft Instruments Parts Avionics Warbird Parts | Bill Berle | Home Built | 0 | January 10th 04 02:20 AM |
New B-24 Double Feature Now Showuing at Zeno's Warbird VideoDrive-In! | Zeno | Military Aviation | 0 | September 16th 03 03:59 PM |
Warbird Runway Crash | Mark and Kim Smith | Military Aviation | 3 | September 14th 03 07:47 PM |