A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Prop performance in clouds question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 4th 08, 02:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 838
Default Prop performance in clouds question

On Mar 3, 6:15*pm, "Kyle Boatright" wrote:

The air density doesn't change, but the amount of oxygen per cubic foot
does. *Imagine a one cubic foot in size. *It is full of red balls
(nitrogen), white balls(oxygen), and green balls (CO2). *It won't hold
another ball without removing something. *Now, you have to add a bunch of
black balls (H2O). *Which means you have to take out some red, white, and
green ones to make space. *Now your 1 cubic foot box holds less nitrogen,
oxygen, and CO2. *This is essentially what happens when the humidity rises.
What it means to a combustion engine is that the engine won't produce as
much power, because there is less oxygen per cubic foot (or whatever) of
air.


Actually the above just **may** help support what I am thinking but in
an opposite sense..

The balls you describe above are not the same size, therefore if you
remove some of the bigger balls and replace them with smaller balls,
wouldn't that make the air "denser"

Conversly, if you take out the little balls and replace them with
bigger balls, there is more space between the balls making it less
denser.

I figure if the visible was the "bigger balls" in that parcel of air,
as compared to the surrounding air outside the IMC, then the air
inside that cloud would be less dense verifying what I have been
reading?

Does this make any sense?

It does make sense that there would be less air, thus reducing ening
power, which would change the strobing of the prop once entering IMC,
and after leaving it, that power would resume since the visible
moisture now is replaced with air.

Allen
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Right prop, wrong prop? Wood prop, metal prop? Gus Rasch Aerobatics 1 February 14th 08 10:18 PM
climb performance Jet vs Prop xerj Piloting 11 July 7th 06 06:31 AM
prop rpm question Bob Fry General Aviation 28 February 3rd 06 11:56 PM
Weather Question: forecasting clouds Jonathan Piloting 11 November 19th 04 08:34 PM
Performance Designs 60 x 66 wood prop Sam Hoskins Aviation Marketplace 0 December 10th 03 01:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.