Way off topic, but it has do to with the French

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:


He didn't lie about being a journalist , you did.


Bertie

Thanks Bertie, but I'm a girl.
I'll be happy to discuss the issue over a pint or two, anytime. :-)

Stella Starr wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:


He didn't lie about being a journalist , you did.


Bertie

Thanks Bertie, but I'm a girl.
I'll be happy to discuss the issue over a pint or two, anytime. :-)


Sorry... But I might take you up on the pint..



Bertie.

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
Stella Starr wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:


He didn't lie about being a journalist , you did.


Bertie

Thanks Bertie, but I'm a girl.
I'll be happy to discuss the issue over a pint or two, anytime. :-)


Sorry... But I might take you up on the pint..

Is that a real pint or a short pint?

"akjcbkJA" wrote in
:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
Stella Starr wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:


He didn't lie about being a journalist , you did.


Bertie

Thanks Bertie, but I'm a girl.
I'll be happy to discuss the issue over a pint or two, anytime. :-)


Sorry... But I might take you up on the pint..

Is that a real pint or a short pint?



WTF is a short pint?


Bertie

On 2008-03-09, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Is that a real pint or a short pint?

WTF is a short pint?

Presumably a 16oz pint, as opposed to the 20oz Imperial pint.

--
From the sunny Isle of Man.
Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.

Dylan Smith wrote in
:

On 2008-03-09, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Is that a real pint or a short pint?

WTF is a short pint?

Presumably a 16oz pint, as opposed to the 20oz Imperial pint.


Just give me a bucket and let my urinary tract sort out the rest.


bertie

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:56:28 +0000 (UTC), Dylan Smith
wrote:

On 2008-03-09, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Is that a real pint or a short pint?

WTF is a short pint?

Presumably a 16oz pint, as opposed to the 20oz Imperial pint.

bottom line; english beers are LESS alcoholic per unit volume than
american beers. period.

--
dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

This space for rent.

On Mar 12, 8:59*pm, dave hillstrom wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:56:28 +0000 (UTC), Dylan Smith

wrote:
On 2008-03-09, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Is that a real pint or a short pint?

WTF is a short pint?

Presumably a 16oz pint, as opposed to the 20oz Imperial pint.

bottom line; english beers are LESS alcoholic per unit volume than
american beers. *period.


If you are only interested in alcohol and getting drunk, that may be
an important, albeit not always correct, consideration. More adult
beer drinkers are looking for taste. Your period is getting the bitter
of you.

Cheers

dave hillstrom wrote in
news
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:56:28 +0000 (UTC), Dylan Smith
wrote:

On 2008-03-09, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Is that a real pint or a short pint?

WTF is a short pint?

Presumably a 16oz pint, as opposed to the 20oz Imperial pint.

bottom line; english beers are LESS alcoholic per unit volume than
american beers. period.


Nope. most are higher alcoho content per volume, though they vary wildly.
Their real beers will blow the back of your head off and leave you feeling
pretty ****ty the next day, too. As you can see, some of them (McEwans,
which tastes awful) are very potent indeed.


http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/alco...ol_info1.shtml


Bertie

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:59:39 -0400, in
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom
bloviated:

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:56:28 +0000 (UTC), Dylan Smith
wrote:

On 2008-03-09, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Is that a real pint or a short pint?

WTF is a short pint?

Presumably a 16oz pint, as opposed to the 20oz Imperial pint.

bottom line; english beers are LESS alcoholic per unit volume than
american beers. period.

How about belgian doppel & tripel ales?