![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "WJRFlyBoy" wrote in message ... This got me thinking, a rudderless Ercoupe in a multi-directional wind landing...... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7l2NJFrvYls Do you (I) really want a home that close to a GA landing strip? Yet I see megabuck homes in my neck of the woods http://www.visualtour.com/shownp.asp?prt=85&t=1217861 http://preview.tinyurl.com/39avgz Use satellite mode Am I missing something? Isn't this a bit off the safety charts? -- Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either! Cake with a 'coupe. Faster than any other equal powered production plane... Need a steeper approach path - hang your hand out the side and pull full nose up. settle right in... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Blueskies" wrote in
: "WJRFlyBoy" wrote in message ... This got me thinking, a rudderless Ercoupe in a multi-directional wind landing...... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7l2NJFrvYls Do you (I) really want a home that close to a GA landing strip? Yet I see megabuck homes in my neck of the woods http://www.visualtour.com/shownp.asp?prt=85&t=1217861 http://preview.tinyurl.com/39avgz Use satellite mode Am I missing something? Isn't this a bit off the safety charts? -- Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either! Cake with a 'coupe. Faster than any other equal powered production plane... No, it wasn't. not by a long shot. Luscombe, Rearwin, T cart. All faster on the same horsepower. Bertie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... "Blueskies" wrote in : "WJRFlyBoy" wrote in message ... This got me thinking, a rudderless Ercoupe in a multi-directional wind landing...... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7l2NJFrvYls Do you (I) really want a home that close to a GA landing strip? Yet I see megabuck homes in my neck of the woods http://www.visualtour.com/shownp.asp?prt=85&t=1217861 http://preview.tinyurl.com/39avgz Use satellite mode Am I missing something? Isn't this a bit off the safety charts? -- Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either! Cake with a 'coupe. Faster than any other equal powered production plane... No, it wasn't. not by a long shot. Luscombe, Rearwin, T cart. All faster on the same horsepower. Bertie Ercoupe 415, 85 hp, cruise ~110 mph (http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/airc...upe-415-g.html) Luscombe 8F, 90 hp, cruise ~95 mph (http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/airc...scombe-8a.html) Rearwin Sportster '8500', 85 hp, cruise ~103 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...0Sportster.htm) Rearwin Speedster '6000C', 95 hp, cruise ~120 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...0Speedster.htm) Taylorcraft BC-12D, 65 hp, 90-100 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...aylorcraft.htm) That was fun. T cart is T-craft? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Blueskies" wrote in
et: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... "Blueskies" wrote in : "WJRFlyBoy" wrote in message ... This got me thinking, a rudderless Ercoupe in a multi-directional wind landing...... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7l2NJFrvYls Do you (I) really want a home that close to a GA landing strip? Yet I see megabuck homes in my neck of the woods http://www.visualtour.com/shownp.asp?prt=85&t=1217861 http://preview.tinyurl.com/39avgz Use satellite mode Am I missing something? Isn't this a bit off the safety charts? -- Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either! Cake with a 'coupe. Faster than any other equal powered production plane... No, it wasn't. not by a long shot. Luscombe, Rearwin, T cart. All faster on the same horsepower. Bertie Ercoupe 415, 85 hp, cruise ~110 mph (http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/airc...ercoupe/1949-e rcoupe-415-g.html) Luscombe 8F, 90 hp, cruise ~95 mph (http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/airc...luscombe/1946- luscombe-8a.html) Rearwin Sportster '8500', 85 hp, cruise ~103 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...n/Rearwin%20Sp ortster.htm) Rearwin Speedster '6000C', 95 hp, cruise ~120 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...n/Rearwin%20Sp eedster.htm) Taylorcraft BC-12D, 65 hp, 90-100 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...aylorcraft.htm) That was fun. T cart is T-craft? I've flown all of these airplanes except the Speedster, though I did talk to one of the Rearwin Family about buying the first production airplane at one time. I think it might still be for sale, but the price is big and it needs complete restoration. It's Cirrus powered one. Th eMenasco powered airplane cruised at 140 plus IIRC. Those figures are rubbish for the Luscombe and the Ercoupe in particular. All the foloowing figures are in MPH. The Ercoupe will do about 95 to 100 on an 85 and the Luscombe will cruise an honest 100 on a 65 and over 110 with an 85. The T-cart will do 95mph with an A -65 ( My first airplane was a T-cart) The Sporster came with a large variety of HPs depending and even the 60 HP one wil cruise at over 90 on a good day. a 90 HP Sporster is a fine airplane, BTW. BTW, the luscombe still holds the closed course record for a production airplane in it's class 69 years after it set the record. 129 mph, IIRC. That was an A-65 posered one BTW. Then there are airplanes like the Jodel 1040. with an O-200 it will lift three 200 lb guys out of an 1100 foot strip with six hours endurance and cruise at 120 mph. A Jodel D-12 will do over 100 with an A-65 and get out of a 600 foot long strip with two guys on board. The Ercoupe was a good performer, but it wasn't the best at anything. Bertie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... Ercoupe 415, 85 hp, cruise ~110 mph (http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/airc...upe-415-g.html) Luscombe 8F, 90 hp, cruise ~95 mph (http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/airc...scombe-8a.html) Rearwin Sportster '8500', 85 hp, cruise ~103 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...0Sportster.htm) Rearwin Speedster '6000C', 95 hp, cruise ~120 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...0Speedster.htm) Taylorcraft BC-12D, 65 hp, 90-100 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...aylorcraft.htm) That was fun. T cart is T-craft? I've flown all of these airplanes except the Speedster, though I did talk to one of the Rearwin Family about buying the first production airplane at one time. I think it might still be for sale, but the price is big and it needs complete restoration. It's Cirrus powered one. Th eMenasco powered airplane cruised at 140 plus IIRC. Those figures are rubbish for the Luscombe and the Ercoupe in particular. All the foloowing figures are in MPH. The Ercoupe will do about 95 to 100 on an 85 and the Luscombe will cruise an honest 100 on a 65 and over 110 with an 85. The T-cart will do 95mph with an A -65 ( My first airplane was a T-cart) The Sporster came with a large variety of HPs depending and even the 60 HP one wil cruise at over 90 on a good day. a 90 HP Sporster is a fine airplane, BTW. BTW, the luscombe still holds the closed course record for a production airplane in it's class 69 years after it set the record. 129 mph, IIRC. That was an A-65 posered one BTW. Then there are airplanes like the Jodel 1040. with an O-200 it will lift three 200 lb guys out of an 1100 foot strip with six hours endurance and cruise at 120 mph. A Jodel D-12 will do over 100 with an A-65 and get out of a 600 foot long strip with two guys on board. The Ercoupe was a good performer, but it wasn't the best at anything. Bertie We've got an old guy (as if I'm not) here who has 3 1/2 coupes, and he does like them. I was quoting him on the performance numbers, so I can't say from personal experience. He also has a twister (raced it at Cleveland and Reno!) in his hanger alongside the meyers 200. He likes flying circles around the cessners tho'... So many airplanes, so little time...what is a T-cart? Your numbers seem to match up on that line... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Blueskies" wrote in
. net: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... Ercoupe 415, 85 hp, cruise ~110 mph (http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/airc...s/ercoupe/1949 -ercoupe-415-g.html) Luscombe 8F, 90 hp, cruise ~95 mph (http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/airc...s/luscombe/194 6-luscombe-8a.html) Rearwin Sportster '8500', 85 hp, cruise ~103 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...win/Rearwin%20 Sportster.htm) Rearwin Speedster '6000C', 95 hp, cruise ~120 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...win/Rearwin%20 Speedster.htm) Taylorcraft BC-12D, 65 hp, 90-100 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...aylorcraft.htm) That was fun. T cart is T-craft? I've flown all of these airplanes except the Speedster, though I did talk to one of the Rearwin Family about buying the first production airplane at one time. I think it might still be for sale, but the price is big and it needs complete restoration. It's Cirrus powered one. Th eMenasco powered airplane cruised at 140 plus IIRC. Those figures are rubbish for the Luscombe and the Ercoupe in particular. All the foloowing figures are in MPH. The Ercoupe will do about 95 to 100 on an 85 and the Luscombe will cruise an honest 100 on a 65 and over 110 with an 85. The T-cart will do 95mph with an A -65 ( My first airplane was a T-cart) The Sporster came with a large variety of HPs depending and even the 60 HP one wil cruise at over 90 on a good day. a 90 HP Sporster is a fine airplane, BTW. BTW, the luscombe still holds the closed course record for a production airplane in it's class 69 years after it set the record. 129 mph, IIRC. That was an A-65 posered one BTW. Then there are airplanes like the Jodel 1040. with an O-200 it will lift three 200 lb guys out of an 1100 foot strip with six hours endurance and cruise at 120 mph. A Jodel D-12 will do over 100 with an A-65 and get out of a 600 foot long strip with two guys on board. The Ercoupe was a good performer, but it wasn't the best at anything. Bertie We've got an old guy (as if I'm not) here who has 3 1/2 coupes, and he does like them. I was quoting him on the performance numbers, so I can't say from personal experience. He also has a twister (raced it at Cleveland and Reno!) in his hanger alongside the meyers 200. He likes flying circles around the cessners tho'... So many airplanes, so little time...what is a T-cart? Your numbers seem to match up on that line... Oh sorry, nickname for a Taylorcraft. Mine was a BF 65 but had a continental in it. Lovely little airplane. It's just been restored by the present owner and is still flying at the age of 69. I have factory figures for the airplane ( Original press publications from the thirties for each) Ercoupe 415-C A-65 powered: cruise @ 80% 95, initial ROC 600fpm stall 37 And the postwar airplane with the 85 cruise @75% 100 mph stall 48 (?!!) initial ROC 750 FPM. I have no idea why the stal speed jumped so much, bu tI suspect they didn't correct indicated on the earlier airplane. 48 sounds high for a wing loading that low as well, but such were the vagaries of published figures. Good thing they're more honest these days, eh? ![]() The 415-E with the C-85 and an uppped gross weight they say will do 110 at 80%, which is definitely not true of any I know of, but it's climb has gone down to 550 FPM. Mostly due to the increased gross of 1400 over the earlier machine's gross of 1180. Electrics and all that.. I forgot about the Culver Cadet, of course, which is published at 120 cruise with an A-75. AFAIK, this was an honest figure for the airplane, but I've never flown one. And the figures for the aforementioned Bellanca Junior with just about any of the available 90 horse engines was from 120 to 126 mph. An that was a three seater. Most of the 90 horse monocoupes would have eaten it for breakfast as well. Some Ercoupe trivia has to include the twin fuselage someone made in the fifties as an airshow curiosity and it holds a place in history as the first aircraft to have a JATO bottle installed. There's a famous pic of that flight with the airplane taking off at an absolutely insane angle of climb.I'm sure it's on the net somewhere. Bertie |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... "Blueskies" wrote in . net: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... Ercoupe 415, 85 hp, cruise ~110 mph (http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/airc...s/ercoupe/1949 -ercoupe-415-g.html) Luscombe 8F, 90 hp, cruise ~95 mph (http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/airc...s/luscombe/194 6-luscombe-8a.html) Rearwin Sportster '8500', 85 hp, cruise ~103 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...win/Rearwin%20 Sportster.htm) Rearwin Speedster '6000C', 95 hp, cruise ~120 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...win/Rearwin%20 Speedster.htm) Taylorcraft BC-12D, 65 hp, 90-100 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...aylorcraft.htm) That was fun. T cart is T-craft? I've flown all of these airplanes except the Speedster, though I did talk to one of the Rearwin Family about buying the first production airplane at one time. I think it might still be for sale, but the price is big and it needs complete restoration. It's Cirrus powered one. Th eMenasco powered airplane cruised at 140 plus IIRC. Those figures are rubbish for the Luscombe and the Ercoupe in particular. All the foloowing figures are in MPH. The Ercoupe will do about 95 to 100 on an 85 and the Luscombe will cruise an honest 100 on a 65 and over 110 with an 85. The T-cart will do 95mph with an A -65 ( My first airplane was a T-cart) The Sporster came with a large variety of HPs depending and even the 60 HP one wil cruise at over 90 on a good day. a 90 HP Sporster is a fine airplane, BTW. BTW, the luscombe still holds the closed course record for a production airplane in it's class 69 years after it set the record. 129 mph, IIRC. That was an A-65 posered one BTW. Then there are airplanes like the Jodel 1040. with an O-200 it will lift three 200 lb guys out of an 1100 foot strip with six hours endurance and cruise at 120 mph. A Jodel D-12 will do over 100 with an A-65 and get out of a 600 foot long strip with two guys on board. The Ercoupe was a good performer, but it wasn't the best at anything. Bertie We've got an old guy (as if I'm not) here who has 3 1/2 coupes, and he does like them. I was quoting him on the performance numbers, so I can't say from personal experience. He also has a twister (raced it at Cleveland and Reno!) in his hanger alongside the meyers 200. He likes flying circles around the cessners tho'... So many airplanes, so little time...what is a T-cart? Your numbers seem to match up on that line... Oh sorry, nickname for a Taylorcraft. Mine was a BF 65 but had a continental in it. Lovely little airplane. It's just been restored by the present owner and is still flying at the age of 69. I have factory figures for the airplane ( Original press publications from the thirties for each) Ercoupe 415-C A-65 powered: cruise @ 80% 95, initial ROC 600fpm stall 37 And the postwar airplane with the 85 cruise @75% 100 mph stall 48 (?!!) initial ROC 750 FPM. I have no idea why the stal speed jumped so much, bu tI suspect they didn't correct indicated on the earlier airplane. 48 sounds high for a wing loading that low as well, but such were the vagaries of published figures. Good thing they're more honest these days, eh? ![]() The 415-E with the C-85 and an uppped gross weight they say will do 110 at 80%, which is definitely not true of any I know of, but it's climb has gone down to 550 FPM. Mostly due to the increased gross of 1400 over the earlier machine's gross of 1180. Electrics and all that.. I forgot about the Culver Cadet, of course, which is published at 120 cruise with an A-75. AFAIK, this was an honest figure for the airplane, but I've never flown one. And the figures for the aforementioned Bellanca Junior with just about any of the available 90 horse engines was from 120 to 126 mph. An that was a three seater. Most of the 90 horse monocoupes would have eaten it for breakfast as well. Some Ercoupe trivia has to include the twin fuselage someone made in the fifties as an airshow curiosity and it holds a place in history as the first aircraft to have a JATO bottle installed. There's a famous pic of that flight with the airplane taking off at an absolutely insane angle of climb.I'm sure it's on the net somewhere. Bertie I ran into that while looikng for info on the undercarriage, here's one of the links: http://www.geocities.com/~planes/cfacts/jato.htm Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blueskies" wrote in message et... "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... "Blueskies" wrote in : "WJRFlyBoy" wrote in message ... This got me thinking, a rudderless Ercoupe in a multi-directional wind landing...... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7l2NJFrvYls Do you (I) really want a home that close to a GA landing strip? Yet I see megabuck homes in my neck of the woods http://www.visualtour.com/shownp.asp?prt=85&t=1217861 http://preview.tinyurl.com/39avgz Use satellite mode Am I missing something? Isn't this a bit off the safety charts? -- Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either! Cake with a 'coupe. Faster than any other equal powered production plane... No, it wasn't. not by a long shot. Luscombe, Rearwin, T cart. All faster on the same horsepower. Bertie Ercoupe 415, 85 hp, cruise ~110 mph (http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/airc...upe-415-g.html) Luscombe 8F, 90 hp, cruise ~95 mph (http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/airc...scombe-8a.html) Rearwin Sportster '8500', 85 hp, cruise ~103 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...0Sportster.htm) Rearwin Speedster '6000C', 95 hp, cruise ~120 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...0Speedster.htm) Taylorcraft BC-12D, 65 hp, 90-100 mph (http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%...aylorcraft.htm) That was fun. T cart is T-craft? The Tcart used to cruise at 100 in real life on a Continental A-65. I have flown several Coupes. Have yet to see 110 mph in level flight on any of them! Sometimes specifications are accurate, and sometimes they aren't! :-) Highflyer Highflight Aviation Services Pinckneyville Airport, PJY |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Highflyer" wrote in message
... ---------------snipped---------- The Tcart used to cruise at 100 in real life on a Continental A-65. I have flown several Coupes. Have yet to see 110 mph in level flight on any of them! Sometimes specifications are accurate, and sometimes they aren't! :-) Highflyer Highflight Aviation Services Pinckneyville Airport, PJY At one time, I marvelled at how much more capable so many older designs must have been--and then I learned that some of those old factory specs were just as imaginative as some of the earliest kits. It was nearly as dissappointing as being a Democrat--or a Republican. :-( Peter |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Dohm" wrote in
: "Highflyer" wrote in message ... ---------------snipped---------- The Tcart used to cruise at 100 in real life on a Continental A-65. I have flown several Coupes. Have yet to see 110 mph in level flight on any of them! Sometimes specifications are accurate, and sometimes they aren't! :-) Highflyer Highflight Aviation Services Pinckneyville Airport, PJY At one time, I marvelled at how much more capable so many older designs must have been--and then I learned that some of those old factory specs were just as imaginative as some of the earliest kits. Actually, many of them were quite accurate. HF is right, the T-cart would do close on 100 with an A-65 and so would a Luscombe. The Monocoupe 90 was very quick and the 30s Cessnas delivered as advertised as well. The aoirplanes that could be classified as "pilots" airplanes tended to do waht they said in advertising because if they didn;'t they would be found out pretty quickly. The airplanes that were pitched more at newcomers probably suffered more from exageration. Bertie |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airparks... | .Blueskies. | Owning | 9 | May 8th 06 04:14 PM |
Airparks and clubs around Phoenix AZ ? | gilan | Piloting | 3 | March 9th 06 01:07 PM |
Airparks and clubs around Phoenix AZ ? | gilan | Owning | 3 | March 9th 06 01:07 PM |
Airparks near Austin TX | TIm Gilbert | Owning | 14 | October 3rd 05 03:18 PM |
A New, New Direction for a Beaten Dead Horse | Shawn | Soaring | 0 | February 25th 05 01:57 PM |