A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Airparks; Living On The Beaten Path?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 11th 08, 05:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
WJRFlyBoy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 531
Default Airparks; Living On The Beaten Path?

Any incidents?

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:09:09 -0400, Orval Fairbairn wrote:

In article ,
WJRFlyBoy wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:05:59 -0500, Orval Fairbairn wrote:

I DO live on a residential airpark (We have about 600 planes) and it is
GREAT! The most noise comes from the yard maintenance people.

Today we had our annual Wings and Wheels event, with many formation
flybys, including 2 P-51 Mustangs, 3 SX-300s and many others.

See:
eaa288.org
http://www.sprucecreekowners.com/
http://www.scpoa.com/
http://fly-in.com/


Very nice, this is a different airpark animal. Homes aren't sitting on the
runway, nice tarmac, what's with the lake on approach?


THe lake is part of the stormwater management system and is also a water
hazard along the golf course. We have around 3000 people living at
Spruce Creek; homes are 1/3 taxiway access, 1/3 golf, 1/3 nature
preserve. Most taxiways are for airplanes only -- only 2 are combined
taxiway/street use. We have our own water/sewer system, so there are no
well/septic tank issues to deal with.

Runway is 4800x150, paved, lighted, with GPS approach.

EAA 288 mets here, in one of the guys' hangar -- we regularly get 75-100
attendees. We ahve something more than 30 RV's of various flavors
(mostly RV-8s) on the field.

When my wife and I were looking for a place to live, I bought the books
on airparks and easily separated out the places where we DIDN'T want to
live:

1.Those out in the boondocks where you have to drive an hour to get a
loaf of bread or a can of paint.

2. Those too small to defend themselves when the neighboring Philistines
start campaigning against the airpark.

3. Anything on wells/septic tanks.

4. Any where the residents don't OWN the runway.

5. No runway lights or who prohibit night operations (Lakeway comes to
mind).

6. Those with poor approaches.

7. Those with too many other restrictions (Ocean Reef comes to mind).

8. Too far from the beach. (Arizona is mostly beach, but the water is a
bit far away.)



--
Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either!
  #2  
Old March 11th 08, 01:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Orval Fairbairn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 530
Default Airparks; Living On The Beaten Path?

In article ,
WJRFlyBoy wrote:

Any incidents?


Whenever you have 600 airplanes residing in a place, you are going to
have SOME incidents --ranging from groundloops to full-house "screwing
the pooch."

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.
  #3  
Old March 11th 08, 01:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
news.chi.sbcglobal.net
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Airparks; Living On The Beaten Path?

Logic would dictate that pilots who live right next to their airplanes
probably fly more than those who have to drive an hour or so to an airport.

And I would think that those who fly more are probably more proficient that
their less-fortunate brothers/sisters.

Which would make me think that living in an air park would probably be
somewhat safer than living next to a typical GA airport...



"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news
In article ,
WJRFlyBoy wrote:

Any incidents?


Whenever you have 600 airplanes residing in a place, you are going to
have SOME incidents --ranging from groundloops to full-house "screwing
the pooch."

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.


  #4  
Old March 12th 08, 09:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
WJRFlyBoy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 531
Default Airparks; Living On The Beaten Path?

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:50:19 GMT, news.chi.sbcglobal.net wrote:

Logic would dictate that pilots who live right next to their airplanes
probably fly more than those who have to drive an hour or so to an airport.

And I would think that those who fly more are probably more proficient that
their less-fortunate brothers/sisters.

Which would make me think that living in an air park would probably be
somewhat safer than living next to a typical GA airport...


I can buy into that somewhat.
--
Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either!
  #5  
Old March 12th 08, 09:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
WJRFlyBoy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 531
Default Airparks; Living On The Beaten Path?

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:36:33 -0400, Orval Fairbairn wrote:

In article ,
WJRFlyBoy wrote:

Any incidents?


Whenever you have 600 airplanes residing in a place, you are going to
have SOME incidents --ranging from groundloops to full-house "screwing
the pooch."


Let's start this over Captiva.

Planes...landing..people...mistakes..houses...too close...imminent death.

Yes?

Make sense?

????
--
Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either!
  #6  
Old March 12th 08, 10:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
BobR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 356
Default Airparks; Living On The Beaten Path?

On Mar 12, 4:51*pm, WJRFlyBoy wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:36:33 -0400, Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article ,
*WJRFlyBoy wrote:


Any incidents?


Whenever you have 600 airplanes residing in a place, you are going to
have SOME incidents --ranging from groundloops to full-house "screwing
the pooch."


Let's start this over Captiva.

Planes...landing..people...mistakes..houses...too close...imminent death.

Yes?

Make sense?

????
--
Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either!


About as much sense as

Soap....Water....Tub....Shower....People....immine nt death.

Stop taking showers and bathing YES?

The odds are greater that you will be killed in the tub or shower!

  #7  
Old March 13th 08, 02:42 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Airparks; Living On The Beaten Path?


"BobR" wrote

About as much sense as


Soap....Water....Tub....Shower....People....immine nt death.


Stop taking showers and bathing YES?


The odds are greater that you will be killed in the tub or shower!


***********************************************

Yep.

I'm beginning to think this guy or gal your post is replying to is:

A) Way too closed minded to belive what people here repeatedly tell him

B) Way too paranoid about airplanes to ever want to actually be in one

C) Has some medically classifiable psychosis

D) An internet kook, along the lines of MX or Ken (or is actually one of
them)

E) Another of a recurring line of trolls that seems to be parading through
the Rec.Aviation groups

F) Some combination of the choices above

Whatever the answer is, I'm done with future conversations with him. Time
will tell which of the above choices are correct, and I don't think it will
take much longer for others to get as tired of him as I have.
--
Jim in NC


  #8  
Old March 13th 08, 03:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
cavelamb himself[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 474
Default Airparks; Living On The Beaten Path?

Morgans wrote:
"BobR" wrote


About as much sense as



Soap....Water....Tub....Shower....People....immi nent death.



Stop taking showers and bathing YES?



The odds are greater that you will be killed in the tub or shower!



***********************************************

Yep.

I'm beginning to think this guy or gal your post is replying to is:

A) Way too closed minded to belive what people here repeatedly tell him

B) Way too paranoid about airplanes to ever want to actually be in one

C) Has some medically classifiable psychosis

D) An internet kook, along the lines of MX or Ken (or is actually one of
them)

E) Another of a recurring line of trolls that seems to be parading through
the Rec.Aviation groups

F) Some combination of the choices above

Whatever the answer is, I'm done with future conversations with him. Time
will tell which of the above choices are correct, and I don't think it will
take much longer for others to get as tired of him as I have.



Or 14 years old?
  #9  
Old March 13th 08, 05:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Airparks; Living On The Beaten Path?


"cavelamb himself" wrote

Or 14 years old?


Yep, that should have been a choice, too. Then, add one or more of the
other choices, too.
--
Jim in NC


  #10  
Old March 13th 08, 02:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
BobR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 356
Default Airparks; Living On The Beaten Path?

On Mar 12, 9:42*pm, "Morgans" wrote:
"BobR" wrote

About as much sense as
Soap....Water....Tub....Shower....People....immine nt death.
Stop taking showers and bathing YES?
The odds are greater that you will be killed in the tub or shower!


***********************************************

Yep.

I'm beginning to think this guy or gal your post is replying to is:

A) Way too closed minded to belive what people here repeatedly tell him

B) Way too paranoid about airplanes to ever want to actually be in one

C) Has some medically classifiable psychosis

D) An internet kook, along the lines of MX or Ken (or is actually one of
them)

E) Another of a recurring line of trolls that seems to be parading through
the Rec.Aviation groups

F) Some combination of the choices above

Whatever the answer is, I'm done with future conversations with him. *Time
will tell which of the above choices are correct, and I don't think it will
take much longer for others to get as tired of him as I have.
--
Jim in NC


The sad part of it is that there are a lot of "educated" adults out
there who are of the same mindset. We shouldn't be allowed to fly
because we might fly over their house, car, or space and suddenly fall
out of the sky on top of them. They are the same group of morons who
will totally disregard a thousand other greater risks to their well
being without a second thought. I wouldn't give a damn except they
are the same ones who are constantly trying to force limits on
everyones freedom to live because they have no life of their own.


Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well-
preserved body,
But rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting

"....Holy ****....What a RIDE!"

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Airparks; Living On The Beaten Path? WJRFlyBoy Piloting 257 March 28th 08 01:26 PM
Airparks... .Blueskies. Owning 9 May 8th 06 04:14 PM
Airparks and clubs around Phoenix AZ ? gilan Home Built 3 March 9th 06 01:07 PM
Airparks near Austin TX TIm Gilbert Owning 14 October 3rd 05 03:18 PM
A New, New Direction for a Beaten Dead Horse Shawn Soaring 0 February 25th 05 01:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.