![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed!
55 months on our Concord.. working great.. I detect it's gettin a bit "soft" I think. open voltage down a little if been sitting a week or so... maybe not.... The test at annual next month will tell the tale... Dave On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:25:11 GMT, "JGalban via AviationKB.com" u32749@uwe wrote: Dave Anderer wrote: Anyone have a preference on Concorde vs. Gill? If the experiences of those on the Cherokee Pilots Assoc. forum are any measure, the sealed Gill is bad news. There are quite a few folks that have been flying around for more than 5 yrs. on their Concorde sealed batteries. Initially, both Gill and Concorde had teething problems, but Concorde seems to have worked them out. On the other hand, we see repeated posts (as recently as a few months ago) that the Gills are dying within 12 months or less. Gill is happy to replace them, but the replacements don't last any longer. They know they have a problem, but apparently haven't been able to fix it. I'm planning on going with a sealed battery when my current wet cell Gill dies. It'll definitely be a Concorde. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2-Batteries | [email protected] | Soaring | 69 | January 4th 07 04:09 AM |
160 new batteries | Mal | Soaring | 0 | October 27th 06 11:36 AM |
Airplane Batteries | [email protected] | Piloting | 79 | January 30th 06 04:50 AM |
UK and Manila source for batteries | Richard Riley | Home Built | 1 | March 13th 04 07:34 PM |
Sealed Batteries | Gene Vignali | Owning | 5 | October 2nd 03 08:32 PM |