![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WJRFlyBoy wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:46:16 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Tina wrote in news:874d408e-73e6-4064-8d08- : I don't think anyone has suggested this, but there is a nearly universal cure if you find yourself uncomfortably out of a reasonable approach condition -- simply say to yourself this isn't looking good enough, go around, and do better the next time. It's my uneducated opinion that too many perfectly good airplanes get turned to scrap because pilots continue to commit to an action that has become untenable. You have a hand on the throttle and it's important to remember to be ready to push it in if you don't like the way things are shaping up. Absolutely. Don't let ego get in the way of good judgement. True again. Sometimes it's not ego, though. A lot of thigs come into play, especially if conditions are tough. It's a curious thing, the sort of single-mindedness that often accompanies an accident. Bertie Lesson here is go-around if concerned and make sure you are preset for that option? Well trained pilots will fly the approach treating it as a constantly changing dynamic. They will be planning for the next anticipated action based on all prevailing cues. Along with this they will have an accompanying exit plan keyed by any expected parameter not being met by any of these cues. The go around trigger should occur if a critical parameter isn't met. Each pilot will have a different trigger level based on various human factors involving the pilot's training and his/her mental processing in play on the approach. This is the pedantic version of "If it don't look good, it usually ain't no good......take it around!! :-))" -- Dudley Henriques |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 12, 7:59*pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
Well trained pilots will fly the approach treating it as a constantly changing dynamic. They will be planning for the next anticipated action based on all prevailing cues. Along with this they will have an accompanying exit plan keyed by any expected parameter not being met by any of these cues. The go around trigger should occur if a critical parameter isn't met. Each pilot will have a different trigger level based on various human factors involving the pilot's training and his/her mental processing in play on the approach. This is the pedantic version of "If it don't look good, it usually ain't no good......take it around!! :-))" -- Dudley Henriques- Hide quoted text - Bertie, WJR andDudley, I like these explanations, even if not highly technical. I would characterize my thinking at the time (if you can call it that) as the "critical parameters" being (1) the ball being centered, (2) the speed being above 70k, (3) keeping the nose down, not "yanked", to permit the plane to sort of fall into a descent at 400-500 ft.min. and (4) my position (altitude/heading) at every point during the turn. Obviously, I wasn't thinking in terms of "critical parameters', but the turn "felt" and looked OK (according to those criteria). I was constantly prepared to level the wings, shove in the thrrottle and break off the approach at any time things didn't feel or look right or stay within the criteria I set. Right hand was on the throttle at all times. I guess my original question was really "how much of a comfort factor, if any, is a coordinated turn vs a slip or skid while turning at that point in the approach?" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
skym wrote:
I guess my original question was really "how much of a comfort factor, if any, is a coordinated turn vs a slip or skid while turning at that point in the approach?" Your "comfort factor" widens as you gain experience through exposure. As you fly each approach and actually see and feel how the airplane responds in various situations you will begin to feel more comfortable. One thing that will help you is to leave the aerodynamics thinking on the ground. Do your theory between flights. Not doing this can result in you over working the problem. Just sit back, fly the airplane, and pay attention to what's happening as you do this. I think you'll find that each approach will get better generally. You will have some plateaus where it all seems to go to hell, but hang in there. One thing about approaches. Keep your main attention outside the airplane. Don't over concentrate on the panel. Do your instrument checking quickly and peripherally as you scan the horizon and your visual positioning on the approach. Don't get all hung up on what the ADI is doing. Your main attention at pattern altitude on down should be NOSE ATTITUDE and VISUAL POSITIONING. Once you get used to this, you are shortening the list of items on your multi-tasking list and your comfort zone will widen for you. -- Dudley Henriques |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 13, 8:44*am, Dudley Henriques wrote:
skym wrote: * I guess my original question was really "how much of a comfort factor, if any, is a coordinated turn vs a slip or skid while turning at that point in the approach?" Your "comfort factor" widens as you gain experience through exposure. As you fly each approach and actually see and feel how the airplane responds in various situations you will begin to feel more comfortable. One thing that will help you is to leave the aerodynamics thinking on the ground. Do your theory between flights. Not doing this can result in you over working the problem. Just sit back, fly the airplane, and pay attention to what's happening as you do this. I think you'll find that each approach will get better generally. You will have some plateaus where it all seems to go to hell, but hang in there. One thing about approaches. Keep your main attention outside the airplane. Don't over concentrate on the panel. Do your instrument checking quickly and peripherally as you scan the horizon and your visual positioning on the approach. Don't get all hung up on what the ADI is doing. Your main attention at pattern altitude on down should be NOSE ATTITUDE and VISUAL POSITIONING. Once you get used to this, you are shortening the list of items on your multi-tasking list and your comfort zone will widen for you. -- Dudley Henriques Dudley, Thanks. Very helpful. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WJRFlyBoy wrote in
: On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:46:16 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Tina wrote in news:874d408e-73e6-4064-8d08- : I don't think anyone has suggested this, but there is a nearly universal cure if you find yourself uncomfortably out of a reasonable approach condition -- simply say to yourself this isn't looking good enough, go around, and do better the next time. It's my uneducated opinion that too many perfectly good airplanes get turned to scrap because pilots continue to commit to an action that has become untenable. You have a hand on the throttle and it's important to remember to be ready to push it in if you don't like the way things are shaping up. Absolutely. Don't let ego get in the way of good judgement. True again. Sometimes it's not ego, though. A lot of thigs come into play, especially if conditions are tough. It's a curious thing, the sort of single-mindedness that often accompanies an accident. Bertie Lesson here is go-around if concerned and make sure you are preset for that option? Yeah. Should be, but we're only human. We have a two approach limit, too. We're not allowed to do a third one ( company manual) the number of accidents off a third approach is alarming. Bertie |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 13, 4:55*pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
WJRFlyBoy wrote : On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:46:16 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Tina wrote in news:874d408e-73e6-4064-8d08- : I don't think anyone has suggested this, but there is a nearly universal cure if you find yourself uncomfortably out of a reasonable approach condition -- simply say to yourself this isn't looking good enough, *go around, and do better the next time. It's my uneducated opinion that too many perfectly good airplanes get turned to scrap because pilots continue to commit to an action that has become untenable. You have a hand on the throttle and it's important to remember to be ready to push it in if you don't like the way things are shaping up. Absolutely. Don't let ego get in the way of good judgement. True again. Sometimes it's not ego, though. A lot of thigs come into play, especially if conditions are tough. It's a curious thing, the sort of single-mindedness that often accompanies an accident. Bertie Lesson here is go-around if concerned and make sure you are preset for that option? Yeah. Should be, but we're only human. We have a two approach limit, too. We're not allowed to do a third one ( company manual) the number of accidents off a third approach is alarming. so you just stay up there? :) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
terry wrote in
: On Mar 13, 4:55*pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: WJRFlyBoy wrote innews:au07i6kpg998.na9z6vwx : On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:46:16 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Tina wrote in news:874d408e-73e6-4064-8d08- : I don't think anyone has suggested this, but there is a nearly universal cure if you find yourself uncomfortably out of a reasonable approach condition -- simply say to yourself this isn't looking good enough, *go around, and do better the next time. It's my uneducated opinion that too many perfectly good airplanes get turned to scrap because pilots continue to commit to an action that has become untenable. You have a hand on the throttle and it's important to remember to be ready to push it in if you don't like the way things are shaping up. Absolutely. Don't let ego get in the way of good judgement. True again. Sometimes it's not ego, though. A lot of thigs come into play, especially if conditions are tough. It's a curious thing, the sort of single-mindedness that often accompanies an accident. Bertie Lesson here is go-around if concerned and make sure you are preset for that option? Yeah. Should be, but we're only human. We have a two approach limit, too. We're not allowed to do a third one ( company manual) the number of accidents off a third approach is alarming. so you just stay up there? :) Yeah, I've been holding over Wayne county since '83 Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Implications of.....keeping the speed up | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 48 | January 14th 07 11:41 PM |
Gamepad, stopping throttle axis from being auto-centered | DenisK | Simulators | 1 | December 20th 06 09:16 AM |
Keeping a builders log | Lou | Home Built | 24 | January 28th 06 10:46 PM |
Thanks for ideas on drilling a centered hole! | Scott | Home Built | 12 | October 25th 04 02:52 AM |
Keeping Me Out of Your Warbird? | Stephen Harding | Military Aviation | 47 | February 12th 04 04:34 PM |