Rod Machado's New PPL Manual

Maxwell wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Google search for (humor in teaching) reveals 2,040,000 hits. I didn't
read them all, but I believe all are positive.
Putting "humor in teaching" in quotes, reveals 11,400 hits, same result I
believe.


So what, a Google search for "home made dog ****" reveals 2,270,000 hits.

Talking bull**** reveals 275,000. Probably more applicable to your
situation.




Your usual I see; irrelevant, and in this case disingenuous and
misleading as well.

You see, in actuality, your statement is not correct. You put quotation
marks on the phrase "home made dog ****". This in fact reveals a Google
search of 1, not the 2,270,000 hits you implied.

Unfortunately, this seems to imply that it is YOU, who are full of "home
made dog ****" :-))



--
Dudley Henriques

"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Maxwell wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Google search for (humor in teaching) reveals 2,040,000 hits. I didn't
read them all, but I believe all are positive.
Putting "humor in teaching" in quotes, reveals 11,400 hits, same result
I believe.


So what, a Google search for "home made dog ****" reveals 2,270,000 hits.

Talking bull**** reveals 275,000. Probably more applicable to your
situation.




Your usual I see; irrelevant, and in this case disingenuous and misleading
as well.

You see, in actuality, your statement is not correct. You put quotation
marks on the phrase "home made dog ****". This in fact reveals a Google
search of 1, not the 2,270,000 hits you implied.

Unfortunately, this seems to imply that it is YOU, who are full of "home
made dog ****" :-))


Nice try, but you are totally incorrect, and completely out of context.

But I will give you credit for being about to respond in less than 5000
words this time!

Maxwell wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Maxwell wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Google search for (humor in teaching) reveals 2,040,000 hits. I didn't
read them all, but I believe all are positive.
Putting "humor in teaching" in quotes, reveals 11,400 hits, same result
I believe.

So what, a Google search for "home made dog ****" reveals 2,270,000 hits.

Talking bull**** reveals 275,000. Probably more applicable to your
situation.



Your usual I see; irrelevant, and in this case disingenuous and misleading
as well.

You see, in actuality, your statement is not correct. You put quotation
marks on the phrase "home made dog ****". This in fact reveals a Google
search of 1, not the 2,270,000 hits you implied.

Unfortunately, this seems to imply that it is YOU, who are full of "home
made dog ****" :-))


Nice try, but you are totally incorrect, and completely out of context.

But I will give you credit for being about to respond in less than 5000
words this time!



Whatever. Have a nice day.

--
Dudley Henriques

"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...

Unfortunately, this seems to imply that it is YOU, who are full of "home
made dog ****" :-))

Hey, is that Labrador, man?

Matt W. Barrow wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Unfortunately, this seems to imply that it is YOU, who are full of "home
made dog ****" :-))

Hey, is that Labrador, man?


In his case, probably something a bit more vicious and stupid I'm afraid.

--
Dudley Henriques

"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Matt W. Barrow wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Unfortunately, this seems to imply that it is YOU, who are full of "home
made dog ****" :-))

Hey, is that Labrador, man?


In his case, probably something a bit more vicious and stupid I'm afraid.


I suspect a man of your eminent distinction never watched "Up in Smoke"! :~)

Matt W. Barrow wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Matt W. Barrow wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Unfortunately, this seems to imply that it is YOU, who are full of "home
made dog ****" :-))
Hey, is that Labrador, man?


In his case, probably something a bit more vicious and stupid I'm afraid.


I suspect a man of your eminent distinction never watched "Up in Smoke"! :~)


Cheech and Chong? Not bad guys,,,,,,Hey...ANYTHING'S better than Tucker
and Msxmanic!! :-))

--
Dudley Henriques

On Mar 25, 1:45*pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:


Unfortunately, this seems to imply that it is YOU, who are full of "home
made dog ****" :-))


I don't see anything unfortunate in that...

Cheers

WingFlaps wrote:
On Mar 25, 1:45 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:

Unfortunately, this seems to imply that it is YOU, who are full of "home
made dog ****" :-))


I don't see anything unfortunate in that...

Cheers

Existential.

--
Dudley Henriques