![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:04 am, wrote: On Mar 29, 5:37 pm, wrote: On Mar 29, 3:22 pm, " wrote: On Mar 29, 1:03 am, "Private" wrote: Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob FYI http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=h http://discussions.flightaware.com/v...?p=47890#47890 http://www.aviation.ca/component/opt...temid,306/func... Condolences to family & friends. The pic that is posted on the Flightaware site is interesting. Is shows an almost complete cockpit with very little damage. Too bad these guys couldn't have hit a 20 foot deep pile of fluffy powder snow. They might have survived... Godspeed to all involved.. Ben On the news a few minutes ago, the TSB guys indicated that it had been an inflight breakup. That can be caused by several factors, including spiralling out of control, severe turbulence, or some pre- existing flaw leading to structural failure. It will take the investigators some time to figure it out, and even then they're sometimes not sure. I won't speculate further, but will say that inflight structural failure is one of the things that scares me most; the other is a midair collision. I pay a lot of attention to the structural inspections of our aircraft, and have my eyeballs all over the place when VFR. Deep snow wouldn't help much if it was an inflight breakup. Most frequent failures involve the tail, and an airplane will stick its nose straight down if the stab departs. Dan http://www.canada.com/globaltv/natio...ce7fefa-920d-4... Thanks Dan, (tears aside). "Dean Braithwaite, chief flight instructor at the Edmonton Flying Club" sounds good in that ref. We've recently discussed the importance of the Artificial Horizon in this group, Maybe the pilot ascended above 12500, that can **** up judgement, went spiral dive (blam) and blamed the AH, for judgement error. The debris field indicates an aircraft structural anomally at high altitude. My GUESS is he was trying to ascend above the weather, did a stall in lowered air density, converted to a spiral dive, that shattered the a/c in a few hundred feet at fairly high altitude. In a spiral dive the a/c is using gravity to accelerate, it's like jumping off a building and it comes on fast. Every pilot must know when he's in a spiral dive and how to correct it. Hard input will shatter the a/c, especially if IAS is near red line, which happens quickly, so be gentle. In my experience, gentle application of elevator with reverse aileron is ok. However, jerking the elevator can snug the turn and exceed the g-rating, specially if the airlerons are used inappropriately. I'd like to hear an expert opinion. Me, too, as yours certainly is far from expert. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
All this Barron Thomas stuff | xyzzy | Owning | 7 | September 9th 05 03:13 AM |
Thomas Roberts | Udo Rumpf | Soaring | 0 | February 29th 04 12:24 AM |