Bad Citation crash

Based on this new information, I am officially re-writing the maxim:

Any landing you can walk away from is a good one.
Any watering you can swim away from is a good one.


"Tina" wrote in message
...
There's a language problem here that might be addressed on the show
"Are you smarter than a fifth grader." If it's a sea plane that
touches down, shouldn't it be called a watering? And if it's a crash
onto a water surface, is it a landing, or does one have to wait until
the airplane is on the bottom to say it's landed?

It's time for my meds: in this case it will be a Bombay Sapphire Gin
Martini, up. It's the only fitting end to a Monday.


On Mar 31, 5:44 pm, "Max" luv2^fly^99@cox.^net wrote:
"Clark" wrote in message

...





"Steve Foley" wrote in
news:6S8Ij.1943$ie3.1129
@trndny02:

"Dylan Smith" wrote in message
...
On 2008-03-31, buttman wrote:
On Mar 30, 3:07 pm, "akjcbkJA" wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7321589.stm

as opposed to a good citation crash?

Yes. A good Citation crash would be one where everyone walked away,
even
if the aircraft was totaled.

Like the one at Bader Field in Atlantic City.

But... If you can walk away, it was a 'good landing'. If you can fly
the
plane again, it's a 'great landing', so I guess that wouldn't qualify
as
a
crash g

But where does riding a boat to shore or swimming away fit into the
landing
quality evaluation?

Fire prevention. Saves the cost and clean-up of foaming the runway.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"B A R R Y" wrote in message
news
Max wrote:


Fire prevention. Saves the cost and clean-up of foaming the runway.

Which is probably cheaper than the enviromental cleanup protection and
cleanup in the bay. G

Well yeah, but then it comes out of a different budget.