![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell writes:
They do die in real airplanes, though, and the FAA has held that a pilot who reads back an erroneous clearance is still required to fly the one given him by ATC, even if ATC doesn't correct him. But that is a physical impossibility. If the pilot heard 110 instead of 210 because of static, and he reads back and flies 110, and ATC doesn't correct him, how is the pilot to magically know what ATC really said and magically fly that? Where did the FAA hold this? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:14:23 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote: If the pilot heard 110 instead of 210 because of static, and he reads back and flies 110, and ATC doesn't correct him, how is the pilot to magically know what ATC really said and magically fly that? Ask, "Say again." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
news ![]() C J Campbell writes: They do die in real airplanes, though, and the FAA has held that a pilot who reads back an erroneous clearance is still required to fly the one given him by ATC, even if ATC doesn't correct him. But that is a physical impossibility. If the pilot heard 110 instead of 210 because of static, and he reads back and flies 110, and ATC doesn't correct him, how is the pilot to magically know what ATC really said and magically fly that? That's because you'r enot a pilot, you're an idiot. When advice is needed on how to make a good burger out of dumpster scraps, we'll call you. Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 4, 7:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
When advice is needed on how to make a good burger out of dumpster scraps, we'll call you. Bertie You gotta put some kind of warning into your posts --"Don't drink juice while reading" That's the second time in a week... sheese... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-04-04 16:39:05 -0700, Bertie the Bunyip said:
Mxsmanic wrote in news ![]() C J Campbell writes: They do die in real airplanes, though, and the FAA has held that a pilot who reads back an erroneous clearance is still required to fly the one given him by ATC, even if ATC doesn't correct him. But that is a physical impossibility. If the pilot heard 110 instead of 210 because of static, and he reads back and flies 110, and ATC doesn't correct him, how is the pilot to magically know what ATC really said and magically fly that? That's because you'r enot a pilot, you're an idiot. When advice is needed on how to make a good burger out of dumpster scraps, we'll call you. Bertie Too bad Anthony really isn't a pilot. His epitaph would be "Died of a physical impossibility." -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Confused re transponders and ADS-B | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | June 27th 06 01:49 AM |
Another ADIZ violation? | Dan Foster | Piloting | 5 | January 4th 06 02:25 AM |
Confused about great circle navigation | xerj | Piloting | 7 | July 10th 04 05:38 PM |
No wonder I'm confused:) | John0714 | Soaring | 0 | May 1st 04 07:02 PM |