A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

USAF F-16 Instructor Discusses Flying Into MOAs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 4th 08, 06:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default USAF F-16 Instructor Discusses Flying Into MOAs

On Apr 4, 10:17*am, Larry Dighera wrote:
Here's an interesting subject:


Before I comment, let me assure you that I always contact FSS to learn
the status of any MOAs along my planned route of flight. *I always
either avoid hot MOAs or coordinate transit with the controlling
agency. *I believe this is what a prudent pilot should do.


I've found pilot's opinions and actions with regard to MOAs is very
regional. Those of us that fly in the SouthWest have learned that
flying through hot MOAs is necessary since most of the country is
either MOA or restricted. However, since MOA is specifically joint use
(VFR and military) pilots normally assume that by coordinating with
ATC you can avoid problems. In this case the pilot was talking with
ATC but the F-16 was not. The F-16 choose to jump the pilot without
informing ATC. Its a bit like a guy in a motorcycle swooping around a
guy on a bicycle. I would like have been upset as well. Again, I
realize that pilots from the midwest and east coast will see it
differently because they can just avoid hot MOAs.

-Robert
  #2  
Old April 4th 08, 07:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default USAF F-16 Instructor Discusses Flying Into MOAs

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:32:10 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote:

On Apr 4, 10:17*am, Larry Dighera wrote:
Here's an interesting subject:


Before I comment, let me assure you that I always contact FSS to learn
the status of any MOAs along my planned route of flight. *I always
either avoid hot MOAs or coordinate transit with the controlling
agency. *I believe this is what a prudent pilot should do.


I've found pilot's opinions and actions with regard to MOAs is very
regional. Those of us that fly in the SouthWest have learned that
flying through hot MOAs is necessary since most of the country is
either MOA or restricted.


That was the situation in this case. The flight to Corona KAJO to
originated at Scottsdale KSDL.

However, since MOA is specifically joint use
(VFR and military) pilots normally assume that by coordinating with
ATC you can avoid problems.


That would be a valid assumption in my opinion.

In this case the pilot was talking with ATC but the F-16 was not.


It would be interesting to know if the controller mentioned the
current active status of the MOA.

The F-16 choose to jump the pilot without informing ATC.


That would seem to be a violation of FARs, IMO.

Its a bit like a guy in a motorcycle swooping around a
guy on a bicycle.


There is one important difference; there is no Vehicle Code statute
prohibiting that (is there?).

I would like have been upset as well.


I, like the Pilatus pilot, would have been expecting the F-16 to
signal me to land or follow as part of an interception.

In the podcast, the F-16 instructor indicated that F-16s are equipped
with VHF radios. It would seem that the intercepting F-16 pilot did
not attempt to contact the Pilatus nor ATC, because there was nothing
for him to say, and it may have revealed his identity.

Again, I realize that pilots from the midwest and east coast will
see it differently because they can just avoid hot MOAs.


My experience has been, that MOA airspace is usually designed so that
flights to or from airports that lie virtually within the MOA can be
made without actually entering them.

In this case, the Pilatus was transiting the MOA at 16,500' en route
to Corona. There has been no mention of the ATC controller advising
the Pilatus of the status of the MOA or attempting to coordinate with
the MOA controlling authority. If the USAF is frustrated by civil
aircraft exercising their right to transit joint use airspace, it
would seem to me, that it is incumbent on them to suggest alternative
procedures/regulation to the FAA, not violate FARs.

AOPA should do that first, if GA wants to see their interests
considered. What do you think about an order mandating ATC to pass
the non-military flight to the military controller with authority over
the military operations occurring within the MOA, so that controller
can assist the civil flight in minimizing its impact on the military
maneuvers something like is done in TRSAs? If the military controller
were unreasonable in handling of the civil flight, its PIC could
decline participation, thus preserving the existing Joint Use aspect
of MOAs.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US Military now wants more northern NY airspace to expand those MOAs Peter R. Piloting 7 June 14th 07 01:30 PM
Bamford discusses 'A Clean Break'/war for Israel agenda on MSNBC's 'Countdown with Keith Olbermann': [email protected] Naval Aviation 0 August 8th 06 08:21 AM
Gliders, transponders, and MOAs Greg Arnold Soaring 2 May 26th 06 05:13 PM
There has _got_ to be a book that discusses 'practical welding' Mike Owning 2 April 16th 06 11:15 PM
Mayor Daley discusses airport on Today Show 2/26 Jenny Wrinkler Piloting 4 February 28th 04 05:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.