![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
buttman wrote:
On Apr 4, 11:17 am, Larry Dighera wrote: While I can appreciate the AF's frustration at having their training exercises interrupted, I doubt that that gives them license to violate FAR 91.111(b) by flying in formation with a civilian aircraft without prior arrangement. The military doesn't have to obey the FARs. They have their own rules they go by. WRONG. That is a common, but incorrect, belief. Here are the laws (you may browse them starting from [1]) that grants FAA authority even over military operations and the cases when the military may deviate from FAA regulations (note (d)(4) and (d)(6)): " TITLE 49--TRANSPORTATION SUBTITLE VII--AVIATION PROGRAMS PART A--AIR COMMERCE AND SAFETY subpart i--general CHAPTER 401--GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 40101. Policy [...] (d) Safety Considerations in Public Interest.--In carrying out subpart III of this part and those provisions of subpart IV applicable in carrying out subpart III, the Administrator shall consider the following matters, among others, as being in the public interest: (1) assigning, maintaining, and enhancing safety and security as the highest priorities in air commerce. (2) regulating air commerce in a way that best promotes safety and fulfills national defense requirements. (3) encouraging and developing civil aeronautics, including new aviation technology. (4) controlling the use of the navigable airspace and regulating civil and military operations in that airspace in the interest of the safety and efficiency of both of those operations. (5) consolidating research and development for air navigation facilities and the installation and operation of those facilities. (6) developing and operating a common system of air traffic control and navigation for military and civil aircraft. (7) providing assistance to law enforcement agencies in the enforcement of laws related to regulation of controlled substances, to the extent consistent with aviation safety." [2] And here are the exceptions under which the military may deviate from those regulations: "Sec. 40106. Emergency powers (a) Deviations From Regulations.--Appropriate military authority may authorize aircraft of the armed forces of the United States to deviate from air traffic regulations prescribed under section 40103(b)(1) and (2) of this title when the authority decides the deviation is essential to the national defense because of a military emergency or urgent military necessity. The authority shall-- (1) give the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration prior notice of the deviation at the earliest practicable time; and (2) to the extent time and circumstances allow, make every reasonable effort to consult with the Administrator and arrange for the deviation in advance on a mutually agreeable basis." [3] [1] http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/tit...titlevii_.html [2] http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-...:+49USC4010 1 [3] http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-...:+49USC4010 6 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
US Military now wants more northern NY airspace to expand those MOAs | Peter R. | Piloting | 7 | June 14th 07 01:30 PM |
Bamford discusses 'A Clean Break'/war for Israel agenda on MSNBC's 'Countdown with Keith Olbermann': | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 8th 06 08:21 AM |
Gliders, transponders, and MOAs | Greg Arnold | Soaring | 2 | May 26th 06 05:13 PM |
There has _got_ to be a book that discusses 'practical welding' | Mike | Owning | 2 | April 16th 06 11:15 PM |
Mayor Daley discusses airport on Today Show 2/26 | Jenny Wrinkler | Piloting | 4 | February 28th 04 05:15 AM |