A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Carrier Islands



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 17th 03, 11:56 AM
ANDREW ROBERT BREEN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Gord Beaman" wrote:
William Hughes wrote:

Early piston aircraft had a lot of torque generated by the engine. In a wave-off
situation, the sharp increase in power would roll the aircraft slightly to port.
Combined with pulling back on the stick to gain altitude, this would result in a
climbing left turn. Having an island in the way when doing this could ruin your
whole day. Hence, the island was placed on the other side of the filght deck.

So what does one do in an a/c which has an engine turning the
opposite way?...


You have a problem ;0
However, the island ended up where it still is because of the direction
the prop (and engine block) revolved in the Sopwith Pup, Camel and
such things as the Parnell Panther, all of which used Clerget or Bentley
rotary engines which swung in the same direction. Once ships were in
service with islands (by which time the rotary-engined aircraft
were gone from service..) and pilots had got used to them there
was no real advantage in making the change to islands on the opposite
side of the ship (prop. direction might not have changed in the
a/c, but to be honest I'm not that well informed on how the direction of
prop. revolution on output from a Napier Lion - Fairey III & so on -
or Armstrong-Siddley Jaguar - Fairey Flycatcher - compared with
that of the Bentley BR2..).
Islands were needed for fast carriers to get the smoke out without
obstructing the hanger deck, a single island was required so that
eddies from the island could be shed outboard instead of across
the flight deck, and the side chosen for the island was determined
by the turning characteristics of rotary-engined biplanes. Once
the island was on the starboard side, the longer life of ships
than aeroplanes ensured it stayed there..

--
Andy Breen ~ Interplanetary Scintillation Research Group
http://users.aber.ac.uk/azb/
"Who dies with the most toys wins" (Gary Barnes)
  #3  
Old November 17th 03, 08:20 PM
ANDREW ROBERT BREEN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Gord Beaman" wrote:
(ANDREW ROBERT BREEN) wrote:

Islands were needed for fast carriers to get the smoke out without
obstructing the hanger deck, a single island was required so that
eddies from the island could be shed outboard instead of across
the flight deck, and the side chosen for the island was determined
by the turning characteristics of rotary-engined biplanes. Once
the island was on the starboard side, the longer life of ships
than aeroplanes ensured it stayed there..


Thanks Andy, interesting...


There's a photograph I've seen somewhere (not in Brown, though he used
it at his talk at the symposium on 'carrier aviation at Yeovilton a
year ago) of Furious in the 1920s which makes the point about smoke
interference (and thus the need for something like an island, if
only a Glorious-or-Courageous type island which more or less just
consisted of the funnel) - essentially a huge, hideous clous
of opaque black smoke emerging from under the aft round-down.
Seeing where the carrier was would be dam; near impossible,
never mind the hot plume and eddies. Having a flush deck and smoke
ducts was also said to have cost Furious 10 aircraft as compared to
Glorious and Courageous.
The island was one of those truely brilliant ideas.

--
Andy Breen ~ Interplanetary Scintillation Research Group
http://users.aber.ac.uk/azb/
"Time has stopped, says the Black Lion clock
and eternity has begun" (Dylan Thomas)
  #4  
Old November 17th 03, 09:28 PM
Thomas W Ping
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ANDREW ROBERT BREEN wrote:

snip

eddies from the island could be shed outboard instead of across
the flight deck, and the side chosen for the island was determined
by the turning characteristics of rotary-engined biplanes. Once
the island was on the starboard side, the longer life of ships
than aeroplanes ensured it stayed there..


OP jumping in to say thanks to all participants for the input.
Coincidentally, I've been engaged in an email discussion about rotary
engines, with a friend, albeit naval aircraft have not - yet - come into
play, there. Too bad I wasn't capable of adding two and two (rotary
torque-turning and my carrier question) and getting four, myself.
Again, I appreciate the responses.

--
Thomas Winston Ping
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
B-29s & P-51s Strike Japan plus "Carrier Franklin" at Zeno's Drive-In zeno Home Built 1 October 4th 04 11:19 PM
B-29s & P-51s Strike Japan plus "Carrier Franklin" at Zeno's Drive-In zeno Instrument Flight Rules 0 October 4th 04 05:32 PM
Can the F-14 carry six AIM-54s and land on carrier? Matthew G. Saroff Military Aviation 1 October 29th 03 08:14 PM
C-130 Hercules on a carrier - possible ?? Jan Gelbrich Military Aviation 10 September 21st 03 04:47 PM
launching V-1s from an aircraft carrier Gordon Military Aviation 34 July 29th 03 11:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.