USAF F-16 Instructor Discusses Flying Into MOAs

On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:41:49 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:38:20 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:

Larry Dighera wrote:
And with the current administration, you can expect a
further decline in justice in our fair nation.
Larry, did you ever decide why, if the government would go to all the
trouble of setting up a big lie to get us into Iraq they wouldn't plant
the WMDs they lied about in the first place?

There was no need to find WMD; their objectives were accomplished when
the RNC and their spokes-puppet Bush under the direction of
Darth-Chenny conned us into engaging in the Iraq war for personal and
political gain.

You have got to be kidding! If there had been evidence of WMD or better
yet a tank full of anthrax sitting next to a missile delivery system the
American people would still be 75% in support of any action that the
Bush administration has taken or might ever take in the Mid-East.


Why would they need that?


Watch the 1st half of Frontline piece, and your questions will be
answered: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/bushswar/ . Until
you've done that, you lack the proper perspective to discuss the
topic.

Eat **** Larry.

No thanks.

I don't get all my news and current events information
from a single source and anyone that does be it PBS or Fox News is an
idiot. I'm pretty sure if they had come up with some new information
that proves that the Bush administration intentionally lied about WMDs
I'd have heard about it. Probably from C-SPAN when the article of
impeachment were drawn up.

Who cares?

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:41:49 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:38:20 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:

Larry Dighera wrote:
And with the current administration, you can expect a
further decline in justice in our fair nation.
Larry, did you ever decide why, if the government would go to all the
trouble of setting up a big lie to get us into Iraq they wouldn't plant
the WMDs they lied about in the first place?
There was no need to find WMD; their objectives were accomplished when
the RNC and their spokes-puppet Bush under the direction of
Darth-Chenny conned us into engaging in the Iraq war for personal and
political gain.
You have got to be kidding! If there had been evidence of WMD or better
yet a tank full of anthrax sitting next to a missile delivery system the
American people would still be 75% in support of any action that the
Bush administration has taken or might ever take in the Mid-East.


Why would they need that?


So they could keep there profiteering as an ongoing enterprise for more
than 8 years? If it weren't for the war in Iraq the Dems wouldn't have a
chance in hell of winning in '08. Even with the war it isn't a sure thing.

On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:42:41 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:

So they could keep there profiteering as an ongoing enterprise for more
than 8 years?

It's unlikely the Iraq occupation will end in our lifetime.

I'm sure Karl Rove knew a Republican president after Bush wasn't
likely way before the last election.

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:42:41 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:

So they could keep there profiteering as an ongoing enterprise for more
than 8 years?

It's unlikely the Iraq occupation will end in our lifetime.

I'm sure Karl Rove knew a Republican president after Bush wasn't
likely way before the last election.


OT

Of course he did. Because there were no WMDs found in Iraq.