![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ink.net... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ink.net... "WaltBJ" wrote in message om... The big problem PC 'pilots' will run into if they have really gotten into 'flying' the PC is that when they get into a real airplane to learn to fly the instructor will be concentrating on teaching them how to control the aircraft by looking !outside! at the real world and not concentrating on the gauges. 'IFR/IMC' flying comes into play much later - first you have to learn to land the airplane and that is done looking outside! Also since most of your initial flying will be done in the vicinity of the airport it's a damn good idea to watch out for other aircraft - 'blue on blue' the hard way is generally not survivable. That said, I reiterate that you can keep your instrument scan/crosscheck up to snuff using a decent PC program more conveniently and a lot cheaper than renting an aircraft or decent instrument trainer (AST300 or similar.) Walt BJ Hi Walt; It's funny picking you up in this thread for two reasons. I was thinking about you just this morning after I downloaded an absolutely beautiful zipper for my FS2004 :-) Secondly, my sentiments about the desktop simulators are about in line with yours and Mary's. I am pleased FAA has taken a different position. ![]() No John, I'm afraid the FAA hasn't taken a contrary position at all . Certainly initial licensing and matriculation of higher skills amoung civil operators using simulators is at an all time high. I can't possibly see how you could be unaware of that fact and have any connection to the certification and currency issues for operators. Since I'm fairly familiar with this issue, having worked on it a bit myself, I've pasted in the entire PCATD cert advisory for you to browse if you wish. You will note that nowhere in the text does the FAA even come anywhere close to recommending a simulator during the initial phases of flight training, which was my salient point. Dude. ![]() Simulation time can be logged as time for experiance requirements and is becomming more common, not less. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Aerobatics | 1 | October 5th 04 10:20 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Home Built | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:16 PM |
FAA letter on flight into known icing | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 78 | December 22nd 03 07:44 PM |
Sim time loggable? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 6th 03 07:47 AM |