A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fading Signal: The Neglect of Electronic Warfare.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 9th 08, 06:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
BlackBeard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 79
Default Fading Signal: The Neglect of Electronic Warfare.

On Apr 8, 7:41*pm, Mike Williamson
wrote:
wrote:
* * And the Air Force had to walk from electronic warfare.
* * Since the idiots still don't understand that nothing is as
* * stealthy as an electonic Satellite.. Since the "Radar"
* * the idiots are evading, isn't radar, it's the media.


* *I hate to interrupt a good show of rhetoric, but the Air Force
hasn't "had to walk from" electronic warfare, as we still have
a dedicated electronic attack platform, that has been deployed
for the last 4 years and counting- an online base "paper" article
noted one of the two deployed squadrons passing the 10,000th combat
flight hour associated with that deployment in January of
last year.

* *As to the rest of the paragraph- *what??

Mike


You are replying (arguing with) to a failed turing-test net-bot. Your
replies to it will only instigate further senseless posts. Ignoring
it completely (and not mentioning its name) is the only way to get it
to go away.

(it is a 'failure' in the worst way because occasionally its handlers
tweak its answers to attempt to debunk doubters. That is scientific
fraud.)

BB

I guess everybody has some mountain to climb.
It's just fate whether you live in Kansas or Tibet...

  #2  
Old April 9th 08, 05:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Derek Lyons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default Fading Signal: The Neglect of Electronic Warfare.

BlackBeard wrote:

You are replying (arguing with) to a failed turing-test net-bot. Your
replies to it will only instigate further senseless posts. Ignoring
it completely (and not mentioning its name) is the only way to get it
to go away.



Sure - but occasionally it _does_ come up with some real gems... My
favorite happened in one of these interminable USAF v. USN threads:

"There was never born a sailor not willing to fight to the death of
the last USAF pilot." (Or something to that effect.)

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CG(X) And The Future Of Naval Warfare. Mike[_1_] Naval Aviation 0 December 14th 07 05:28 PM
GAO: Electronic Warfa Comprehensive Strategy Needed for Suppressing Enemy Mike Naval Aviation 0 December 27th 05 06:23 PM
GPS - losing signal Hilton Piloting 6 October 23rd 05 07:18 PM
Fading Rocker Switches O. Sami Saydjari Owning 2 February 16th 04 03:54 PM
asymetric warfare phil hunt Military Aviation 505 January 23rd 04 12:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.