A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How much longer?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 10th 08, 10:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
romeomike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39
Default How much longer?

Phil J wrote:


A majority of people in Nevada absolutely do not want the Yucca
Mountain site to become active. They feel that the rest of the
country is trying to cram this thing down their throats, and they
resent it.

Phil


Absolutely correct, and Utah doesn't want that stuff going through its
state on the way to Nevada either. Save transportation costs and bury it
in Iowa.
  #2  
Old April 11th 08, 01:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Phil J
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 142
Default How much longer?

On Apr 10, 4:50*pm, romeomike wrote:
Phil J wrote:

A majority of people in Nevada absolutely do not want the Yucca
Mountain site to become active. *They feel that the rest of the
country is trying to cram this thing down their throats, and they
resent it.


Phil


Absolutely correct, and Utah doesn't want that stuff going through its
state on the way to Nevada either. Save transportation costs and bury it
in Iowa.


The Alexis Park Inn and Nuculer Waste Storage Suites. Kinda has a
ring to it!

Phil
  #3  
Old April 11th 08, 02:35 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
romeomike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39
Default How much longer?

Phil J wrote:
On Apr 10, 4:50 pm, romeomike wrote:
Phil J wrote:

A majority of people in Nevada absolutely do not want the Yucca
Mountain site to become active. They feel that the rest of the
country is trying to cram this thing down their throats, and they
resent it.
Phil

Absolutely correct, and Utah doesn't want that stuff going through its
state on the way to Nevada either. Save transportation costs and bury it
in Iowa.


The Alexis Park Inn and Nuculer Waste Storage Suites. Kinda has a
ring to it!

Phil


Yeah, but they need a refinery first. but you know, ..."those who live
by the sword, die by the sword." But those evil environmentalists will
probably save him.
  #4  
Old April 11th 08, 03:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Phil J
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 142
Default How much longer?

On Apr 10, 8:35*pm, romeomike wrote:
Phil J wrote:
On Apr 10, 4:50 pm, romeomike wrote:
Phil J wrote:


A majority of people in Nevada absolutely do not want the Yucca
Mountain site to become active. *They feel that the rest of the
country is trying to cram this thing down their throats, and they
resent it.
Phil
Absolutely correct, and Utah doesn't want that stuff going through its
state on the way to Nevada either. Save transportation costs and bury it
in Iowa.


The Alexis Park Inn and Nuculer Waste Storage Suites. *Kinda has a
ring to it!


Phil


Yeah, but they need a refinery first. but you know, ..."those who live
by the sword, die by the sword." But those evil environmentalists will
probably save him.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


The Alexis Park Inn and Nuculer Waste Storage Suites.
Read our customers' glowing reviews!

  #5  
Old April 11th 08, 04:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
romeomike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39
Default How much longer?

Phil J wrote:
On Apr 10, 8:35 pm, romeomike wrote:
Phil J wrote:
On Apr 10, 4:50 pm, romeomike wrote:
Phil J wrote:
A majority of people in Nevada absolutely do not want the Yucca
Mountain site to become active. They feel that the rest of the
country is trying to cram this thing down their throats, and they
resent it.
Phil
Absolutely correct, and Utah doesn't want that stuff going through its
state on the way to Nevada either. Save transportation costs and bury it
in Iowa.
The Alexis Park Inn and Nuculer Waste Storage Suites. Kinda has a
ring to it!
Phil

Yeah, but they need a refinery first. but you know, ..."those who live
by the sword, die by the sword." But those evil environmentalists will
probably save him.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


The Alexis Park Inn and Nuculer Waste Storage Suites.
Read our customers' glowing reviews!


Soak up some rays by the pool! Enjoy aroma therapy on our patio!
Moisturize you skin in our sludge ponds! Avoid surgery, sterilization by
gamma rays!... Endless potential attractions to increase business.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My 302 and PDA are no longer on speaking terms Dixie Sierra Soaring 4 September 10th 07 05:16 PM
Some IFR GPS's no longer useable kevmor Instrument Flight Rules 2 May 28th 07 02:27 AM
Jepp no longer in the GA business...? John Harper Instrument Flight Rules 30 June 17th 04 10:49 PM
Some airmen facing longer deployments Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 January 16th 04 08:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.