A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FAR 91.113d Question.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 12th 08, 08:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
WingFlaps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 621
Default FAR 91.113d Question.

On Apr 13, 4:59*am, Peter Clark
wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:19:54 -0700 (PDT), SD
wrote:





Hello-


I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. *I pretty much
grasp the concept well. *Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons,
gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). *For example, If I am flying
my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course
to the right and give it the ROW. *Likewise for any of the other items
on that list except, helo's, right?


Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in
91.113d, what do I do? *Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird
decloaked and was dead ahead of me. *I tried to hail him but I had no
luck. *Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver
around him. *There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort.


Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give
them the right away. *Its easy on planet earth since we are in
Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend
to travel at impulse power. *I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird
however.


What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the
Warbird?


Who has better manuverability? *Better manuverability has to give way.- Hide quoted text -


Nope, you think a glider has less manuverability than an airship?

Cheers
  #12  
Old April 12th 08, 09:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
george
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 803
Default FAR 91.113d Question.

On Apr 13, 7:37 am, WingFlaps wrote:

Nope, you think a glider has less manuverability than an airship?

I wanna see an airship doing aeros......
How would you pull a stall turn :-)

  #13  
Old April 13th 08, 02:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
WestCDA
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 28
Default FAR 91.113d Question.

Don't **** off the Romulans - they don't have any bathrooms on board and are
usually really cranky after a few years of holding it. Your best bet is to
make a temporal adjustment and proceed straight ahead a few femtoseconds
before the warbird got there. Don't cut it too close though.

"SD" wrote in message
...
Hello-

I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. I pretty much
grasp the concept well. Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons,
gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). For example, If I am flying
my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course
to the right and give it the ROW. Likewise for any of the other items
on that list except, helo's, right?

Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in
91.113d, what do I do? Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird
decloaked and was dead ahead of me. I tried to hail him but I had no
luck. Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver
around him. There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort.

Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give
them the right away. Its easy on planet earth since we are in
Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend
to travel at impulse power. I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird
however.

What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the
Warbird?



  #14  
Old April 13th 08, 03:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Vaughn Simon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 735
Default FAR 91.113d Question.


"SD" wrote in message
...

I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. I pretty much
grasp the concept well. Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons,
gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). For example, If I am flying
my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course
to the right and give it the ROW. Likewise for any of the other items
on that list except, helo's, right?

As a guy who flew gliders exclusively for his first few years in the cockpit,
I learned to totally disregard FAR 91.113d in most situations. (cue collective
gasp from newsgroup readers.)

The ROW rules only work when both pilots see each other, know the rules, and
are inclined to follow them. Frankly, it is rare that we can assume that all of
those conditions are met. Therefore, 91.113d is mostly useful for assigning
blame after an accident has already occurred.

As much as possible, I always assume the other plane has the ROW, and try to
occupy a bit of airspace that is well out of his way.

Vaughn


  #15  
Old April 13th 08, 05:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mike Isaksen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 242
Default FAR 91.113d Question.


"Vaughn Simon" wrote ...
Therefore, 91.113d is mostly useful for assigning blame after an accident
has already occurred.

As much as possible, I always assume the other plane
has the ROW, and try to occupy a bit of airspace that
is well out of his way.


I am aghast that you would use Common Sense over the Letter of the Law. You
have no place in this newsgroup! (well,... the way it's been lately anyway)
;-)


  #16  
Old April 13th 08, 06:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Phil J
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 142
Default FAR 91.113d Question.

On Apr 12, 11:19*am, SD wrote:
Hello-

I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. *I pretty much
grasp the concept well. *Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons,
gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). *For example, If I am flying
my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course
to the right and give it the ROW. *Likewise for any of the other items
on that list except, helo's, right?

Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in
91.113d, what do I do? *Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird
decloaked and was dead ahead of me. *I tried to hail him but I had no
luck. *Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver
around him. *There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort.

Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give
them the right away. *Its easy on planet earth since we are in
Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend
to travel at impulse power. *I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird
however.

What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the
Warbird?


The starship's inertial dampers give her more maneuverability than
you, so technically you have the ROW. However Romulans are notorious
for ignoring the FARs, so your best bet is to steer well clear of the
warbird. Whatever you do, do not pass the warbird. The Romulans take
this as a sign of disrespect. There have been many atmosphere-rage
incidents in which aircraft have been vaporized by warbirds. So
unless your Cessna has shields that can absorb a disruptor blast, use
extreme caution.

Proconsul Phil
  #17  
Old April 13th 08, 07:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
SD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default FAR 91.113d Question.

On Apr 13, 10:13 am, Phil J wrote:
On Apr 12, 11:19 am, SD wrote:



Hello-


I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. I pretty much
grasp the concept well. Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons,
gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). For example, If I am flying
my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course
to the right and give it the ROW. Likewise for any of the other items
on that list except, helo's, right?


Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in
91.113d, what do I do? Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird
decloaked and was dead ahead of me. I tried to hail him but I had no
luck. Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver
around him. There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort.


Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give
them the right away. Its easy on planet earth since we are in
Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend
to travel at impulse power. I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird
however.


What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the
Warbird?


The starship's inertial dampers give her more maneuverability than
you, so technically you have the ROW. However Romulans are notorious
for ignoring the FARs, so your best bet is to steer well clear of the
warbird. Whatever you do, do not pass the warbird. The Romulans take
this as a sign of disrespect. There have been many atmosphere-rage
incidents in which aircraft have been vaporized by warbirds. So
unless your Cessna has shields that can absorb a disruptor blast, use
extreme caution.

Proconsul Phil


Is there any kind of countermeasures or shield capabilities within a
Cessna 172 or is that reserved for the newer models equipped with the
Garmin G1000 package? Also, If by chance I happen to get hit with
their tractor beam, if I power down the cessna, will I maintain S&L ?

Thanks
SD
  #18  
Old April 13th 08, 08:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
SD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default FAR 91.113d Question.

On Apr 13, 10:13 am, Phil J wrote:
On Apr 12, 11:19 am, SD wrote:



Hello-


I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. I pretty much
grasp the concept well. Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons,
gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). For example, If I am flying
my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course
to the right and give it the ROW. Likewise for any of the other items
on that list except, helo's, right?


Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in
91.113d, what do I do? Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird
decloaked and was dead ahead of me. I tried to hail him but I had no
luck. Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver
around him. There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort.


Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give
them the right away. Its easy on planet earth since we are in
Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend
to travel at impulse power. I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird
however.


What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the
Warbird?


The starship's inertial dampers give her more maneuverability than
you, so technically you have the ROW. However Romulans are notorious
for ignoring the FARs, so your best bet is to steer well clear of the
warbird. Whatever you do, do not pass the warbird. The Romulans take
this as a sign of disrespect. There have been many atmosphere-rage
incidents in which aircraft have been vaporized by warbirds. So
unless your Cessna has shields that can absorb a disruptor blast, use
extreme caution.

Proconsul Phil


Is there any kind of countermeasures or shield capabilities within a
Cessna 172 or is that reserved for the newer models equipped with the
Garmin G1000 package? Also, If by chance I happen to get hit with
their tractor beam, if I power down the cessna, will I maintain S&L ?

Thanks
SD
  #19  
Old April 14th 08, 12:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Phil J
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 142
Default FAR 91.113d Question.

On Apr 13, 1:56*pm, SD wrote:
On Apr 13, 10:13 am, Phil J wrote:





On Apr 12, 11:19 am, SD wrote:


Hello-


I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. *I pretty much
grasp the concept well. *Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons,
gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). *For example, If I am flying
my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course
to the right and give it the ROW. *Likewise for any of the other items
on that list except, helo's, right?


Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in
91.113d, what do I do? *Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird
decloaked and was dead ahead of me. *I tried to hail him but I had no
luck. *Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver
around him. *There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort.


Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give
them the right away. *Its easy on planet earth since we are in
Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend
to travel at impulse power. *I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird
however.


What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the
Warbird?


The starship's inertial dampers give her more maneuverability than
you, so technically you have the ROW. *However Romulans are notorious
for ignoring the FARs, so your best bet is to steer well clear of the
warbird. *Whatever you do, do not pass the warbird. *The Romulans take
this as a sign of disrespect. *There have been many atmosphere-rage
incidents in which aircraft have been vaporized by warbirds. *So
unless your Cessna has shields that can absorb a disruptor blast, use
extreme caution.


Proconsul Phil


Is there any kind of countermeasures or shield capabilities within a
Cessna 172 or is that reserved for the newer models equipped with the
Garmin G1000 package? *Also, If by chance I happen to get hit with
their tractor beam, if I power down the cessna, will I maintain S&L ?

Thanks
SD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Unfortunately, none of the piston-powered Cessnas has enough spare
electrical capacity for shields. However, I believe the new impulse-
drive Citation does include shields as an option. It's a shame the
government won't allow civilian use of cloaking devices. That would
require far less power than shields, and any aircraft with at least
200 horsepower could be equipped. It's possible you could get your
hands on an illegal cloaking device from a Ferengi, but it will cost
you plenty and there would of course be absolutely no guarantee on it,
IF it even works at all.

If you do happen to get hit with a Romulan tractor beam, it will most
likely destroy your aircraft. They are non too subtle in their use of
tractor beams. And if they pull you aboard their ship, any males on
your aircraft would most likely become playthings for the female crew
members. That may sound appealing, but believe me you won't enjoy it.

Proconsul Phil
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MA-8 Static test firing of MA-8 Atlas 113D S62-06634.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 0 April 10th 07 02:51 PM
I want to ask you the most important question of your life. The question is: Are you saved? It is no gasman Soaring 0 August 26th 05 06:39 PM
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good Excelsior Home Built 0 April 22nd 05 01:11 AM
B-2 question Harley W Daugherty Military Aviation 37 August 27th 04 12:45 AM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.