![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 13, 4:59*am, Peter Clark
wrote: On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:19:54 -0700 (PDT), SD wrote: Hello- I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. *I pretty much grasp the concept well. *Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). *For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. *Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in 91.113d, what do I do? *Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird decloaked and was dead ahead of me. *I tried to hail him but I had no luck. *Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver around him. *There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort. Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give them the right away. *Its easy on planet earth since we are in Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend to travel at impulse power. *I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird however. What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the Warbird? Who has better manuverability? *Better manuverability has to give way.- Hide quoted text - Nope, you think a glider has less manuverability than an airship? Cheers |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 13, 7:37 am, WingFlaps wrote:
Nope, you think a glider has less manuverability than an airship? I wanna see an airship doing aeros...... How would you pull a stall turn :-) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't **** off the Romulans - they don't have any bathrooms on board and are
usually really cranky after a few years of holding it. Your best bet is to make a temporal adjustment and proceed straight ahead a few femtoseconds before the warbird got there. Don't cut it too close though. "SD" wrote in message ... Hello- I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. I pretty much grasp the concept well. Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in 91.113d, what do I do? Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird decloaked and was dead ahead of me. I tried to hail him but I had no luck. Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver around him. There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort. Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give them the right away. Its easy on planet earth since we are in Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend to travel at impulse power. I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird however. What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the Warbird? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "SD" wrote in message ... I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. I pretty much grasp the concept well. Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? As a guy who flew gliders exclusively for his first few years in the cockpit, I learned to totally disregard FAR 91.113d in most situations. (cue collective gasp from newsgroup readers.) The ROW rules only work when both pilots see each other, know the rules, and are inclined to follow them. Frankly, it is rare that we can assume that all of those conditions are met. Therefore, 91.113d is mostly useful for assigning blame after an accident has already occurred. As much as possible, I always assume the other plane has the ROW, and try to occupy a bit of airspace that is well out of his way. Vaughn |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Vaughn Simon" wrote ... Therefore, 91.113d is mostly useful for assigning blame after an accident has already occurred. As much as possible, I always assume the other plane has the ROW, and try to occupy a bit of airspace that is well out of his way. I am aghast that you would use Common Sense over the Letter of the Law. You have no place in this newsgroup! (well,... the way it's been lately anyway) ;-) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 11:19*am, SD wrote:
Hello- I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. *I pretty much grasp the concept well. *Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). *For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. *Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in 91.113d, what do I do? *Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird decloaked and was dead ahead of me. *I tried to hail him but I had no luck. *Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver around him. *There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort. Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give them the right away. *Its easy on planet earth since we are in Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend to travel at impulse power. *I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird however. What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the Warbird? The starship's inertial dampers give her more maneuverability than you, so technically you have the ROW. However Romulans are notorious for ignoring the FARs, so your best bet is to steer well clear of the warbird. Whatever you do, do not pass the warbird. The Romulans take this as a sign of disrespect. There have been many atmosphere-rage incidents in which aircraft have been vaporized by warbirds. So unless your Cessna has shields that can absorb a disruptor blast, use extreme caution. Proconsul Phil |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 13, 10:13 am, Phil J wrote:
On Apr 12, 11:19 am, SD wrote: Hello- I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. I pretty much grasp the concept well. Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in 91.113d, what do I do? Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird decloaked and was dead ahead of me. I tried to hail him but I had no luck. Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver around him. There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort. Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give them the right away. Its easy on planet earth since we are in Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend to travel at impulse power. I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird however. What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the Warbird? The starship's inertial dampers give her more maneuverability than you, so technically you have the ROW. However Romulans are notorious for ignoring the FARs, so your best bet is to steer well clear of the warbird. Whatever you do, do not pass the warbird. The Romulans take this as a sign of disrespect. There have been many atmosphere-rage incidents in which aircraft have been vaporized by warbirds. So unless your Cessna has shields that can absorb a disruptor blast, use extreme caution. Proconsul Phil Is there any kind of countermeasures or shield capabilities within a Cessna 172 or is that reserved for the newer models equipped with the Garmin G1000 package? Also, If by chance I happen to get hit with their tractor beam, if I power down the cessna, will I maintain S&L ? Thanks SD |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 13, 10:13 am, Phil J wrote:
On Apr 12, 11:19 am, SD wrote: Hello- I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. I pretty much grasp the concept well. Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in 91.113d, what do I do? Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird decloaked and was dead ahead of me. I tried to hail him but I had no luck. Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver around him. There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort. Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give them the right away. Its easy on planet earth since we are in Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend to travel at impulse power. I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird however. What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the Warbird? The starship's inertial dampers give her more maneuverability than you, so technically you have the ROW. However Romulans are notorious for ignoring the FARs, so your best bet is to steer well clear of the warbird. Whatever you do, do not pass the warbird. The Romulans take this as a sign of disrespect. There have been many atmosphere-rage incidents in which aircraft have been vaporized by warbirds. So unless your Cessna has shields that can absorb a disruptor blast, use extreme caution. Proconsul Phil Is there any kind of countermeasures or shield capabilities within a Cessna 172 or is that reserved for the newer models equipped with the Garmin G1000 package? Also, If by chance I happen to get hit with their tractor beam, if I power down the cessna, will I maintain S&L ? Thanks SD |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 13, 1:56*pm, SD wrote:
On Apr 13, 10:13 am, Phil J wrote: On Apr 12, 11:19 am, SD wrote: Hello- I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. *I pretty much grasp the concept well. *Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). *For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. *Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in 91.113d, what do I do? *Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird decloaked and was dead ahead of me. *I tried to hail him but I had no luck. *Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver around him. *There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort. Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give them the right away. *Its easy on planet earth since we are in Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend to travel at impulse power. *I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird however. What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the Warbird? The starship's inertial dampers give her more maneuverability than you, so technically you have the ROW. *However Romulans are notorious for ignoring the FARs, so your best bet is to steer well clear of the warbird. *Whatever you do, do not pass the warbird. *The Romulans take this as a sign of disrespect. *There have been many atmosphere-rage incidents in which aircraft have been vaporized by warbirds. *So unless your Cessna has shields that can absorb a disruptor blast, use extreme caution. Proconsul Phil Is there any kind of countermeasures or shield capabilities within a Cessna 172 or is that reserved for the newer models equipped with the Garmin G1000 package? *Also, If by chance I happen to get hit with their tractor beam, if I power down the cessna, will I maintain S&L ? Thanks SD- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Unfortunately, none of the piston-powered Cessnas has enough spare electrical capacity for shields. However, I believe the new impulse- drive Citation does include shields as an option. It's a shame the government won't allow civilian use of cloaking devices. That would require far less power than shields, and any aircraft with at least 200 horsepower could be equipped. It's possible you could get your hands on an illegal cloaking device from a Ferengi, but it will cost you plenty and there would of course be absolutely no guarantee on it, IF it even works at all. If you do happen to get hit with a Romulan tractor beam, it will most likely destroy your aircraft. They are non too subtle in their use of tractor beams. And if they pull you aboard their ship, any males on your aircraft would most likely become playthings for the female crew members. That may sound appealing, but believe me you won't enjoy it. Proconsul Phil |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MA-8 Static test firing of MA-8 Atlas 113D S62-06634.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 10th 07 02:51 PM |
I want to ask you the most important question of your life. The question is: Are you saved? It is no | gasman | Soaring | 0 | August 26th 05 06:39 PM |
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Excelsior | Home Built | 0 | April 22nd 05 01:11 AM |
B-2 question | Harley W Daugherty | Military Aviation | 37 | August 27th 04 12:45 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |