|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
April 15th 08, 04:24 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
Comparison of Air band Receivers
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:35:55 GMT, Jay Maynard
wrote in : On 2008-04-15, Larry Dighera wrote: On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:24:38 GMT, Jay Maynard wrote in : that's standard on the GNS430W. I wonder why that is? Probably because it was easy and cheap to implement, and didn't add any (or very much) complexity to the computer-driven user interface. Ah, right. 8.33 MHz is probably a feature of the chip-set employed in the circuit design. There would be little reason not to implement it given the digital (as opposed to step switches) nature of the user interface. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to use the AR-108 Air Band Scanner Channels | Chris L | Piloting | 3 | January 1st 08 11:45 PM |
| Can old LORAN receivers use single loop antennas | Rick Marvin | Home Built | 0 | September 10th 05 06:10 AM |
| Who has fitted a TRI-band ELT to a TB20? | Chris G. | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | June 28th 05 03:21 PM |
| Band of brothers | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 10 | March 9th 04 10:44 PM |
| Home air band listening. | Rich Hare | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 15th 03 03:15 AM |
Hybrid Mode
