![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: PC flight simulators
From: Andreas Maurer Date: 11/19/03 4:34 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: On 19 Nov 2003 22:30:20 GMT, (ArtKramr) wrote: Subject: PC flight simulators From: Steve Date: 11/19/03 2:22 PM Pacific Standard Time 1943!! ROFLMAO!! If you were with us (The 344th Bomb Group) in 1943 I don't think you would have found much to laugh about. We sure didn't. There was a lot going on, but none of it was very funny. Could you tell more about that simulator, Art? How were the visuals done? What computed the flight model? Bye Andreas .. Sure Andreas. Since you ask like a gentleman, I'll be glad to discuss it with you. As I stated before, it was a real B-26 truncated behind the radio/Nav compartment and mounted on a swive-l tilt base in a hanger. When we climbed into it the pilots went into the cockpit, and went through turning on all their switches and starting and running up the engines as if for a real takeoff. Everything lit up and came to life. I climbed into the nose, and switched on everything activating the bombsight, watched the gyro stand up and come to speed, watched the intervelometer light up and the bomb rack station indicator show loaded bomb racks on each station. Now to the interesting stuff. My view was a color photograph chart that rolled under me at groundspeed. But it was a scrambled image, That is the target area might be a port that showed Manhattan in the center, the China coast to the West and San Francisco to the East. This was to prevent anyone rom being familiar with any area so you couldn't say, "hey I lived there and know it well" You had to fly and navigate since no one had a recognition advantage. We had been briefed before the simulator drill as to the exact rarget are we were to hit and the route we were to fly. Where we were to expect flak and fighters but we were never given any indcation of the damage that we would sustain. On course we had extensive flak that shook the simulator violently. We had an engine out that rolled us violently into the dead engine but Paul and Bob caughtiit in time and we connued on course on sungle engine. We were now losing about 300 feet /minute and couldn't do a damned thing about it. We were jumped by fighterand returned fire. Our cockpit and my nose filled with smoke and had a strong cordite smell;; mixed with the odor of urine and vomit which was always present. I opened the vent and a strong relative wind blew the nose clear of smoke. We stopped losing altitiude and the target came into sight.I lined up the Norden head with the target uncaged the gyro and called "on course" to Paul locking in the Norden head to the base, Suddenly we got heavy Flak that rocked the plane violently. "please don't tumble my gyro" I prayed. ****, The gyro tumbled.I grabbed the gimble ring erector knobs, got the gyro up and caged it. But it was too late. We would now have to do a go around through that ****ing flak again. I had totally forgotten I was in a simulator. I was sweating , tense and upset about the go around as though it was real It was real to me at that point. I got on the intercom and asked Paul to hold us steady through the run.I forgot that the simulator was pre-programed and there were certain things that were going to happen that was beyond our control. On the second run we hit the target with good results. closed the bombay doors and we turned for home. The run was over, We got out of the plane sweating and shaken. Note that I call it a plane, not a simulator because to us it was a plane,not a simiulator. And we were almost surprised to find that when we got out of the plane we were in a hanger. Reality rushed back. That night we went to the officers club and over a few Scotches we drank and kept saying. "holy ****. holy ****" Adreas that is as I remember it. If you have any questions I will be glad to answer them. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: PC flight simulators
From: Andreas Maurer Date: 11/20/03 7:24 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: On 20 Nov 2003 02:47:43 GMT, (ArtKramr) wrote: When we climbed into it the pilots went into the cockpit, and went through turning on all their switches and starting and running up the engines as if for a real takeoff. Real engines or simulated ones? Simulated On course we had extensive flak that shook the simulator violently. How was that simulated? Hydraulics? How were the visuals of exploding flak shells simulated? Hydraulics I think. We never saw wthe bursts only heard thenand felt the concussion. We were jumped by fighterand returned fire. Cool... how were the visuals of the fighters done? Did you use real guns t return the fire (I'm sure yur gunners needed something to aim at)? Projected on a screen opened the vent and a strong relative wind blew the nose clear of smoke. Interesting.. so your sim was mounted in some kind of wind channel? No. It was just a blower motor that went on when the flap was opened. I got on the intercom and asked Paul to hold us steady through the run. How could he do that? Did he also have visuals or was he relying on instruments only? He could't.But I forgot that in the excitement of the realism. We laughed about it later. I forgot that the simulator was pre-programed and there were certain things that were going to happen that was beyond our control. I see... pre-programmed. So you were more or less sitting in a movie theatre, correct? Well in a sense yes.But how we navigated and bombed was not pre programmed. The results were real scores in real time. Interesting stuff... you'd love to see one of the custom cockpits that have been built for the "game" MS Flight Simulator. These days people are using cut-off Boeing-737 noses. Yes I would. But it is not likely that I ever will. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , ArtKramr
writes Subject: PC flight simulators From: Andreas Maurer Could you tell more about that simulator, Art? How were the visuals done? What computed the flight model? As I stated before, it was a real B-26 truncated behind the radio/Nav compartment and mounted on a swive-l tilt base in a hanger. large snip - good stuff The run was over, We got out of the plane sweating and shaken. Note that I call it a plane, not a simulator because to us it was a plane,not a simiulator. And we were almost surprised to find that when we got out of the plane we were in a hanger. Reality rushed back. That night we went to the officers club and over a few Scotches we drank and kept saying. "holy ****. holy ****" Adreas that is as I remember it. If you have any questions I will be glad to answer them. The key question, I suppose, is "was it useful to you"? Sounds like it successfully scared the hell out of you and your crew, but also forced you to deal with too much happening too fast, often with the "aircraft" bouncing around and filling with smoke (the smoke generator, fans and vents sound very effective). Looking back on it after having done in combat what it was trying to simulate, was it useful in training you or just preparing you? -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: PC flight simulators
From: "Paul J. Adam" Date: 11/21/03 6:32 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: In message , ArtKramr writes Subject: PC flight simulators From: Andreas Maurer Could you tell more about that simulator, Art? How were the visuals done? What computed the flight model? As I stated before, it was a real B-26 truncated behind the radio/Nav compartment and mounted on a swive-l tilt base in a hanger. large snip - good stuff The run was over, We got out of the plane sweating and shaken. Note that I call it a plane, not a simulator because to us it was a plane,not a simiulator. And we were almost surprised to find that when we got out of the plane we were in a hanger. Reality rushed back. That night we went to the officers club and over a few Scotches we drank and kept saying. "holy ****. holy ****" Adreas that is as I remember it. If you have any questions I will be glad to answer them. The key question, I suppose, is "was it useful to you"? Sounds like it successfully scared the hell out of you and your crew, but also forced you to deal with too much happening too fast, often with the "aircraft" bouncing around and filling with smoke (the smoke generator, fans and vents sound very effective). Looking back on it after having done in combat what it was trying to simulate, was it useful in training you or just preparing you? -- It was very useful. In fact just last night I was thinking about it and came to some realisations that I haven't thought about in 60 years. It occured to me that every time I started a bomb run, locked in the head and went on course and, uncaged the gryo, flak concussions hit. This ended up in a tumbled vertical flight gyro, Now to a Norden bombardier a tumbled guro is a nightmare that requires a go around, a very dangerous procedure. And every time that damned gyro tumbled I would have to frantically erect it by pressuring the gumbal rings to get it erect and caged. I don't know how many, if anyone on this NG has ever fought a tumbled gyro, but it is a dread experience. And that hanger trainer gave me a lot of practice erecting and caging gyros. every time we flew the trainer I became a bit faster and more proficient at getting that gyro up and running again., It occured to me last night that those *******s did it ail on purpose. The flak hiting once the gyro was uncaged was no coincidence, it was programmed that way. And I guess it was a good thing in the end because it sure built proficiency especially in B-26's. Why B-26's? Well B-26's used to tear autopilots apart in short order. Therefore every bomb run was done via PDI (PIlots directinal indicator). In other words the pilot kept a needle centered as I operated the bombsight. If he did one skidding uncordinated turn, he would tumble my gyro. That is much less of a problen on other planes where the bomb runs were done on autopilot. So I can see why the hanger trainer was set up to tumble gyros. Yup. I sure learned a lot. And fast.Very fast.. Regards, Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Aerobatics | 1 | October 5th 04 10:20 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Home Built | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:16 PM |
FAA letter on flight into known icing | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 78 | December 22nd 03 07:44 PM |
Sim time loggable? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 6th 03 07:47 AM |