Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross

gatt writes:

Well done!

Staying below the weight limit would be better done. Bending the rules and
surviving is scarcely commendable when you could have simply obeyed the rules
instead.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

gatt writes:

Well done!

Staying below the weight limit would be better done. Bending the
rules and surviving is scarcely commendable when you could have simply
obeyed the rules instead.


What's the difference? Nothing whatsoever to do with you.
Nothing.


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

gatt writes:

Well done!

Staying below the weight limit would be better done. Bending the
rules and surviving is scarcely commendable when you could have simply
obeyed the rules instead.

You've never flown in conditions where the FARs allow you to depart
overweight? If you haven't, then STFU, you moron.

Mxsmanic wrote:
gatt writes:

Well done!

Staying below the weight limit would be better done. Bending the rules and
surviving is scarcely commendable when you could have simply obeyed the rules
instead.

If actual pilots here need advice they'll get it from pilots. You
don't know what you're talking about, you're not qualified to discuss
the "rules" and the actual pilots here don't need to and should not take
advice from a poser.

You don't fly and you've never flown. You play with yourself. Taking
advice from you would is dangerous.

-c
CP-ASEL-IA

gatt writes:

If actual pilots here need advice they'll get it from pilots.

Since a lot of actual pilots ignore any advice that doesn't agree with their
own beliefs, it doesn't really matter where it comes from.

You don't know what you're talking about, you're not qualified to discuss
the "rules" and the actual pilots here don't need to and should not take
advice from a poser.

The rules are pretty clear, and anyone can understand them, pilot or not.
Even lawyers and insurance adjusters can understand them. It's not a secret
code.

On Apr 23, 6:45*am, Mxsmanic wrote:


You don't know what you're talking about, you're not qualified to discuss
the "rules" and the actual pilots here don't need to and should not take
advice from a poser.

The rules are pretty clear, and anyone can understand them, pilot or not.
Even lawyers and insurance adjusters can understand them. *It's not a secret
code.

They have secret decoder rings that translate what you read into
something else.

Cheers

In article a2ec3b3d-5285-4668-96d9-df04f0506686
@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com, says...
On Apr 23, 6:45*am, Mxsmanic wrote:


You don't know what you're talking about, you're not qualified to discuss
the "rules" and the actual pilots here don't need to and should not take
advice from a poser.

The rules are pretty clear, and anyone can understand them, pilot or not.

Mxsmanic wrote:
gatt writes:

If actual pilots here need advice they'll get it from pilots.

Since a lot of actual pilots ignore any advice that doesn't agree with their
own beliefs, it doesn't really matter where it comes from.


Take a poll, there, Chairborne. The difference between everybody else
here and you is that we have successfully and repeatedly flown actual
aircraft.

Not everybody here is a bad or inexperienced pilot. There are some here
who are quite highly and demonstrably accomplished and, ...funny...
they continue to make it quite clear that you're a clueless idiot also.

You might as well try teaching sharks to fish. Flying is what we do. You
just sit in your chair and play with yourself. That's your extend of
understanding of weight, balance and the performance of an aircraft.


-C
CP-ASEL-IA

gatt wrote in
news:k8qdnUincNZ5_pPVnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@integraonlin e:

Mxsmanic wrote:
gatt writes:

If actual pilots here need advice they'll get it from pilots.

Since a lot of actual pilots ignore any advice that doesn't agree
with their own beliefs, it doesn't really matter where it comes from.


Take a poll, there, Chairborne. The difference between everybody else
here and you is that we have successfully and repeatedly flown actual
aircraft.

Not everybody here is a bad or inexperienced pilot. There are some
here who are quite highly and demonstrably accomplished and,
...funny... they continue to make it quite clear that you're a
clueless idiot also.

You might as well try teaching sharks to fish. Flying is what we do.
You just sit in your chair and play with yourself. That's your extend
of understanding of weight, balance and the performance of an
aircraft.


-C
CP-ASEL-IA


Anthony SIMULATES playing with himself.

gatt writes:

Take a poll, there, Chairborne. The difference between everybody else
here and you is that we have successfully and repeatedly flown actual
aircraft.

There are other differences. My judgement is not clouded by testosterone, for
example, nor do I suffer from insecurity or a bloated ego.

Not everybody here is a bad or inexperienced pilot.

Agreed, but some of the loudest mouths are also some of the worst pilots, if
I'm to judge by the mistakes they make here.

There are some here
who are quite highly and demonstrably accomplished and, ...funny...
they continue to make it quite clear that you're a clueless idiot also.

People who are highly accomplished don't need to resort to personal attacks.
Those who engage in personal attacks always have issues.

You might as well try teaching sharks to fish. Flying is what we do.

Some people here don't do it very well. They dismiss risks that could easily
get them killed. I guess being studly is important enough to them that they
are willing to die for it.