![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dick" wrote in message news:fevPj.5393$Ux4.1316@trnddc07... Thanks. Interesting and I've asked manufacturer if a higher mph range might be made available. I wonder what the downside of such an instrument is?? The up side (besides cost) is extremely good resolution at slow air speeds. Especially 0 to 30, where conventional ASIs are usually less reliable, if even calibrated in that range. I bought one from AS&S years ago calibrated for a helo that wasn't bad, but not nearly as repeatable as a Hall in the low speed range. The only down side I recall is their reliance on gravity to oppose their reading. They bump around a little bit on bumpy days, and of coarse are useless when inverted. I don't recall much change on positive G's. They seemed accurate in 2 or three G turns because the indicating disk is very light weight. Just the zero and half G's loads were a problem. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It might be realistic to look at Dwyer Instruments; there are many
offerings. In particular, the $50 unit http://www.dwyer-inst.com/htdocs/air...riesMWSpec.CFM is 0-55 kt, resolution of 0.2 kt. Accuracy is about 5% of reading. There are mini-pitot based models, rising vane (as used on some ultralight type craft I've seen) and these rotating units. On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:23:30 -0500, "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote: "Dick" wrote in message news:fevPj.5393$Ux4.1316@trnddc07... Thanks. Interesting and I've asked manufacturer if a higher mph range might be made available. I wonder what the downside of such an instrument is?? The up side (besides cost) is extremely good resolution at slow air speeds. Especially 0 to 30, where conventional ASIs are usually less reliable, if even calibrated in that range. I bought one from AS&S years ago calibrated for a helo that wasn't bad, but not nearly as repeatable as a Hall in the low speed range. The only down side I recall is their reliance on gravity to oppose their reading. They bump around a little bit on bumpy days, and of coarse are useless when inverted. I don't recall much change on positive G's. They seemed accurate in 2 or three G turns because the indicating disk is very light weight. Just the zero and half G's loads were a problem. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "GeorgeB" wrote in message ... It might be realistic to look at Dwyer Instruments; there are many offerings. In particular, the $50 unit http://www.dwyer-inst.com/htdocs/air...riesMWSpec.CFM is 0-55 kt, resolution of 0.2 kt. Accuracy is about 5% of reading. There are mini-pitot based models, rising vane (as used on some ultralight type craft I've seen) and these rotating units. That would certainly address the bumpy conditions issue. But the bumpy conditions really aren't a problem even on approach. It doesn't actually bump very much. What kind of aircraft are you flying? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't fly, but enjoy reading and learning; unlike others, I TRY to
not do anything that even smells like trolling. On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:54:34 -0500, "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote: "GeorgeB" wrote in message .. . It might be realistic to look at Dwyer Instruments; there are many offerings. In particular, the $50 unit http://www.dwyer-inst.com/htdocs/air...riesMWSpec.CFM is 0-55 kt, resolution of 0.2 kt. Accuracy is about 5% of reading. There are mini-pitot based models, rising vane (as used on some ultralight type craft I've seen) and these rotating units. That would certainly address the bumpy conditions issue. But the bumpy conditions really aren't a problem even on approach. It doesn't actually bump very much. What kind of aircraft are you flying? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nothing wrong with that.
"GeorgeB" wrote in message ... I don't fly, but enjoy reading and learning; unlike others, I TRY to not do anything that even smells like trolling. On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:54:34 -0500, "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote: "GeorgeB" wrote in message . .. It might be realistic to look at Dwyer Instruments; there are many offerings. In particular, the $50 unit http://www.dwyer-inst.com/htdocs/air...riesMWSpec.CFM is 0-55 kt, resolution of 0.2 kt. Accuracy is about 5% of reading. There are mini-pitot based models, rising vane (as used on some ultralight type craft I've seen) and these rotating units. That would certainly address the bumpy conditions issue. But the bumpy conditions really aren't a problem even on approach. It doesn't actually bump very much. What kind of aircraft are you flying? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
primary flight instruments on partial panel | Greg | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | September 1st 06 04:18 AM |
Flying on the Cheap - Instruments | [email protected] | Home Built | 24 | February 27th 06 02:30 PM |
Flight Logging - Cheap | Marry Daniel or David Grah | Soaring | 10 | March 10th 04 01:22 AM |
Flight sims way to cheap to pass up for sale on Ebay. | Curtis | Simulators | 0 | November 20th 03 04:41 PM |
Flight Instruments Book? | Greg Esres | Piloting | 1 | July 16th 03 08:31 PM |