Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross

Mxsmanic wrote:
gatt writes:

Take a poll, there, Chairborne. The difference between everybody else
here and you is that we have successfully and repeatedly flown actual
aircraft.

There are other differences. My judgement is not clouded by testosterone, for
example, nor do I suffer from insecurity or a bloated ego.

Yeah, right.

The six year old kid next door has better judement than you.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

writes:

Yeah, right.

As usual.

Mxsmanic wrote in
news
writes:

Sure it is in a simulatated world.

Or if you hit the ground just beyond the runway in the real world
because you took off overweight.


You don't have the slightest idea of what being 100 lbs overweight will do
to an aircraft's performance, you ****ing idiot. If being 100 lbs
overweight was such a major disaster waiting to happen, why to the FARs
allow it in some instances? If you can't answer that, you just wasting
bandwidth and electrons posting your stupid drivel.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

No. But I am controlled by intellect rather than hormones.

Intellect requires the ability to know the difference between **** and
shinola. You don't. Ergo, your postings are your homones pushing you to
cry out for attention. You, Anthony, are totally controlled by your
hormones and you don't have enough intellect to know it.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

writes:

Your self rightous, holier than thou arrogance?

I'm direct, not arrogant. Some angry young males interpret any lack
of complete submission to be "arrogance," at least when it occurs in
other people. I refuse to back down, and that irritates them no end.
But that is their problem, not mine.


No, Anthony. You're just a ****ing idiot who doesn't know **** from
shinola.

In article ,
says...
Dave Doe writes:

How will you know?

From the NTSB report.

What NTSB report - you haven't boarded the flight yet.

Why do you misquote and change context so much?

Oh yeah, I can answer that one. No need for you to answer it. Let me
just spell that out clearer. Do NOT answer that question. That's the
second question above - let me quote it - "Why do you misquote and
change context so much?" - DO NOT ANSWER THAT QUESTION.

--
Duncan

In article a2ec3b3d-5285-4668-96d9-df04f0506686
@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com, says...
On Apr 23, 6:45*am, Mxsmanic wrote:


You don't know what you're talking about, you're not qualified to discuss
the "rules" and the actual pilots here don't need to and should not take
advice from a poser.

The rules are pretty clear, and anyone can understand them, pilot or not.

In article ,
says...
writes:

Sure it is in a simulatated world.

Or if you hit the ground just beyond the runway in the real world because you
took off overweight.

How would that happen, given you are (see OP) 75 or 100 pound overweight
- COG is not mentioned, so assume we're inside the envelope (fwd/aft
envelope).

The military routinely operate 'overweight' - they can not achieve the
climb-out angle required by civilian flight.

How come they don't all just crash off the end of the RWY?

--
Duncan

Blueskies,

C-172 checklist, tanks both for takeoff and landing....


So?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

On Apr 23, 5:39*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:
Sure it is in a simulatated world.

Or if you hit the ground just beyond the runway in the real world because you
took off overweight.

I've flown a 172 more loaded that!

Cheers