"Analyst: Obama Would Be A Nightmare For Defense Programs, Firms"

Ray O'Hara wrote:
"Jack Linthicum" wrote in message
...

On Apr 22, 9:48 am, Mike wrote:

Goodbye to your favorite weapon programs. The money will go to liberal
social welfare programs....

Analyst: Obama Would Be A Nightmare For Defense Programs, Firms

Defense Daily

If Sen. Barak Obama of Illinois wins the Democratic presidential
nomination and then goes on to be elected to the White House, the
defense industry better brace for tough times, according to Heidi
Wood, Morgan Stanley defense analyst.


other industries would benefit and we need to spend money on the U.S.



Except Big spending Lib programs Generally mean Big Government rather
the private enterprise. Thus more money to the rat holes of midnight
Basketball, Head start, & God only knows what program they come up with
for this housing crisis.

"Tiger" wrote in message
...
Ray O'Hara wrote:
"Jack Linthicum" wrote in message

...

On Apr 22, 9:48 am, Mike wrote:

Goodbye to your favorite weapon programs. The money will go to liberal
social welfare programs....

Analyst: Obama Would Be A Nightmare For Defense Programs, Firms

Defense Daily

If Sen. Barak Obama of Illinois wins the Democratic presidential
nomination and then goes on to be elected to the White House, the
defense industry better brace for tough times, according to Heidi
Wood, Morgan Stanley defense analyst.


other industries would benefit and we need to spend money on the U.S.



Except Big spending Lib programs Generally mean Big Government rather
the private enterprise. Thus more money to the rat holes of midnight
Basketball, Head start, & God only knows what program they come up with
for this housing crisis.


the government has never been bigger than it is now under the republicans.
the way you wingnut fools can go on about big government and government
spendings when its you who are pushing the first and benefiting from
the later while decrying both is as hinesquaters says hilarious.

the government has never been bigger than it is now under the republicans.
the way you wingnut fools can go on about big government and government
spendings when its you who are pushing the first and benefiting from
the later while decrying both is as hinesquaters says hilarious.

You forgot to take off your tinfoil hat long enough to insist 9/11 and
the security concerns since was a right wing conspiracy...

On Apr 24, 3:16 pm, eyeball wrote:
the government has never been bigger than it is now under the republicans.
the way you wingnut fools can go on about big government and government
spendings when its you who are pushing the first and benefiting from
the later while decrying both is as hinesquaters says hilarious.

You forgot to take off your tinfoil hat long enough to insist 9/11 and
the security concerns since was a right wing conspiracy...

No, but falling asleep on the watch and using security as a shield
against illegal activity might fall into that category. Plus the
obvious fascination with torture even before any al Qaeda prisoners
were available.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...v=rss_politics

"Jack Linthicum" wrote in message
...
On Apr 24, 3:16 pm, eyeball wrote:
the government has never been bigger than it is now under the
republicans.
the way you wingnut fools can go on about big government and
government
spendings when its you who are pushing the first and benefiting from
the later while decrying both is as hinesquaters says hilarious.

You forgot to take off your tinfoil hat long enough to insist 9/11 and
the security concerns since was a right wing conspiracy...

No, but falling asleep on the watch and using security as a shield
against illegal activity might fall into that category. Plus the
obvious fascination with torture even before any al Qaeda prisoners
were available.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...v=rss_politics


eyelash is a classic.
he screams "conspiricy theorist" at any who don't worship bush.