A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Analyst: Obama Would Be A Nightmare For Defense Programs, Firms"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 24th 08, 08:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval,us.military.army
eyeball
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default "Analyst: Obama Would Be A Nightmare For Defense Programs, Firms"


the government has never been bigger than it is now under the republicans.
the way you wingnut fools can go on about big government and government
spendings when its you who are pushing the first and benefiting from
the later while decrying both is as hinesquaters says hilarious.


You forgot to take off your tinfoil hat long enough to insist 9/11 and
the security concerns since was a right wing conspiracy...
  #2  
Old April 24th 08, 08:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval,us.military.army
Jack Linthicum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default "Analyst: Obama Would Be A Nightmare For Defense Programs, Firms"

On Apr 24, 3:16 pm, eyeball wrote:
the government has never been bigger than it is now under the republicans.
the way you wingnut fools can go on about big government and government
spendings when its you who are pushing the first and benefiting from
the later while decrying both is as hinesquaters says hilarious.


You forgot to take off your tinfoil hat long enough to insist 9/11 and
the security concerns since was a right wing conspiracy...


No, but falling asleep on the watch and using security as a shield
against illegal activity might fall into that category. Plus the
obvious fascination with torture even before any al Qaeda prisoners
were available.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...v=rss_politics
  #3  
Old April 25th 08, 07:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval,us.military.army
Ray O'Hara[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 58
Default "Analyst: Obama Would Be A Nightmare For Defense Programs, Firms"


"Jack Linthicum" wrote in message
...
On Apr 24, 3:16 pm, eyeball wrote:
the government has never been bigger than it is now under the

republicans.
the way you wingnut fools can go on about big government and

government
spendings when its you who are pushing the first and benefiting from
the later while decrying both is as hinesquaters says hilarious.


You forgot to take off your tinfoil hat long enough to insist 9/11 and
the security concerns since was a right wing conspiracy...


No, but falling asleep on the watch and using security as a shield
against illegal activity might fall into that category. Plus the
obvious fascination with torture even before any al Qaeda prisoners
were available.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...v=rss_politics


eyelash is a classic.
he screams "conspiricy theorist" at any who don't worship bush.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" Robert M. Gary Piloting 168 February 5th 08 05:32 PM
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" Robert M. Gary Instrument Flight Rules 137 February 5th 08 05:32 PM
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale >pk Aviation Marketplace 0 October 16th 06 07:48 AM
2007 Defense Budget: Changes in Aircraft Programs. Mike Naval Aviation 0 January 6th 06 06:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.