A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lancair crash at SnF



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 25th 08, 12:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
B A R R Y[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 782
Default Lancair crash at SnF

Shirl wrote:
WingFlaps wrote:
I've also heard a lot of BS in this thread about not having good
palces to put the plane. There is nearly always somewhere flat to put
the plane within 90 degrees of the runway centerline -even a road.
Malls have big parking lots!


I don't know about where you live, but malls here have lots of light
poles, concrete islands, park-and-rest benches and ... and ... vehicles
everywhere. And having gone through it once, I'm no longer fooled by
what *looks* "flat" at 500, or even 50 feet.


I'd rather hit a bus shelter or light poles @ 40-50 MPH than go in
inverted after a stall/spin @ 200-300 AGL.
  #2  
Old April 25th 08, 12:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,735
Default Lancair crash at SnF

B A R R Y wrote in news:Z%iQj.22374$%41.15539
@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com:

Shirl wrote:
WingFlaps wrote:
I've also heard a lot of BS in this thread about not having good
palces to put the plane. There is nearly always somewhere flat to

put
the plane within 90 degrees of the runway centerline -even a road.
Malls have big parking lots!


I don't know about where you live, but malls here have lots of light
poles, concrete islands, park-and-rest benches and ... and ...

vehicles
everywhere. And having gone through it once, I'm no longer fooled by
what *looks* "flat" at 500, or even 50 feet.


I'd rather hit a bus shelter or light poles @ 40-50 MPH than go in
inverted after a stall/spin @ 200-300 AGL.


Exactly.

Bertie
  #3  
Old April 25th 08, 01:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Maxwell[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,043
Default Lancair crash at SnF


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
B A R R Y wrote in news:Z%iQj.22374$%41.15539
@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com:

Shirl wrote:
WingFlaps wrote:
I've also heard a lot of BS in this thread about not having good
palces to put the plane. There is nearly always somewhere flat to

put
the plane within 90 degrees of the runway centerline -even a road.
Malls have big parking lots!

I don't know about where you live, but malls here have lots of light
poles, concrete islands, park-and-rest benches and ... and ...

vehicles
everywhere. And having gone through it once, I'm no longer fooled by
what *looks* "flat" at 500, or even 50 feet.


I'd rather hit a bus shelter or light poles @ 40-50 MPH than go in
inverted after a stall/spin @ 200-300 AGL.


Exactly.

Bertie


One doesn't equal the other moron.



  #4  
Old April 25th 08, 02:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,735
Default Lancair crash at SnF

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:YbkQj.67982$y05.56887
@newsfe22.lga:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
B A R R Y wrote in news:Z%iQj.22374$%41.15539
@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com:

Shirl wrote:
WingFlaps wrote:
I've also heard a lot of BS in this thread about not having good
palces to put the plane. There is nearly always somewhere flat to

put
the plane within 90 degrees of the runway centerline -even a road.
Malls have big parking lots!

I don't know about where you live, but malls here have lots of

light
poles, concrete islands, park-and-rest benches and ... and ...

vehicles
everywhere. And having gone through it once, I'm no longer fooled

by
what *looks* "flat" at 500, or even 50 feet.

I'd rather hit a bus shelter or light poles @ 40-50 MPH than go in
inverted after a stall/spin @ 200-300 AGL.


Exactly.

Bertie


One doesn't equal the other moron.





Obviously, fjukktard.


Figured out that maze on the back of your froot loops box yet?


Bertie
  #5  
Old April 25th 08, 05:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
Daedalus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 62
Default Lancair crash at SnF

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:24:31 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:YbkQj.67982$y05.56887
:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
B A R R Y wrote in news:Z%iQj.22374$%41.15539
@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com:

Shirl wrote:
WingFlaps wrote:
I've also heard a lot of BS in this thread about not having good
palces to put the plane. There is nearly always somewhere flat to
put
the plane within 90 degrees of the runway centerline -even a road.
Malls have big parking lots!

I don't know about where you live, but malls here have lots of

light
poles, concrete islands, park-and-rest benches and ... and ...
vehicles
everywhere. And having gone through it once, I'm no longer fooled

by
what *looks* "flat" at 500, or even 50 feet.

I'd rather hit a bus shelter or light poles @ 40-50 MPH than go in
inverted after a stall/spin @ 200-300 AGL.


Exactly.

Bertie


One doesn't equal the other moron.





Obviously, fjukktard.


Figured out that maze on the back of your froot loops box yet?


Bertie


lol

Jade

  #6  
Old April 25th 08, 06:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
Bertie the Bunyip[_25_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,735
Default Lancair crash at SnF

Daedalus wrote in
:

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:24:31 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:YbkQj.67982$y05.56887
:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
B A R R Y wrote in news:Z%iQj.22374$%

41.15539
@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com:

Shirl wrote:
WingFlaps wrote:
I've also heard a lot of BS in this thread about not having good
palces to put the plane. There is nearly always somewhere flat

to
put
the plane within 90 degrees of the runway centerline -even a

road.
Malls have big parking lots!

I don't know about where you live, but malls here have lots of

light
poles, concrete islands, park-and-rest benches and ... and ...
vehicles
everywhere. And having gone through it once, I'm no longer fooled

by
what *looks* "flat" at 500, or even 50 feet.

I'd rather hit a bus shelter or light poles @ 40-50 MPH than go in
inverted after a stall/spin @ 200-300 AGL.


Exactly.

Bertie

One doesn't equal the other moron.





Obviously, fjukktard.


Figured out that maze on the back of your froot loops box yet?


Bertie


lol

Jade



$:*0"


Bertie
  #7  
Old April 25th 08, 01:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Shirl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 190
Default Lancair crash at SnF

Shirl:
I don't know about where you live, but malls here have lots of light
poles, concrete islands, park-and-rest benches and ... and ... vehicles
everywhere. And having gone through it once, I'm no longer fooled by
what *looks* "flat" at 500, or even 50 feet.


Barry:
I'd rather hit a bus shelter or light poles @ 40-50 MPH than go in
inverted after a stall/spin @ 200-300 AGL.


I agree. And it could be a place to go.
I was just saying that a mall/strip center parking lot isn't necessarily
the "ah...I'll go there!" place. Even at 7 a.m., there can be cars and
people everywhere.
  #8  
Old April 25th 08, 01:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default Lancair crash at SnF

B A R R Y schrieb:

I'd rather hit a bus shelter or light poles @ 40-50 MPH than go in
inverted after a stall/spin @ 200-300 AGL.


But I hope that you rather risk a stall/spin than to hit a crowd of
pedestrians with that meat chopper turning.
  #9  
Old April 25th 08, 01:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
WingFlaps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 621
Default Lancair crash at SnF

On Apr 26, 12:18*am, Stefan wrote:
B A R R Y schrieb:

I'd rather hit a bus shelter or light poles @ 40-50 MPH than go in
inverted after a stall/spin @ 200-300 AGL.


But I hope that you rather risk a stall/spin than to hit a crowd of
pedestrians with that meat chopper turning.


I thought the engine had stopped?

Cheers
  #10  
Old April 25th 08, 01:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 530
Default Lancair crash at SnF

On 2008-04-25, WingFlaps wrote:
On Apr 26, 12:18*am, Stefan wrote:
But I hope that you rather risk a stall/spin than to hit a crowd of
pedestrians with that meat chopper turning.


I thought the engine had stopped?


The prop will often keep turning after the engine has stopped - unless
you can feather it. (I have flown singles with feathering propellors,
but they are the exception).

There are also degrees of engine failure other than quitting dead -
sometimes, an engine may continue to make a minimal amount of power
after the failure event occurred.

--
From the sunny Isle of Man.
Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
lancair crash scapoose, OR gatt Piloting 10 October 26th 06 03:34 PM
Lancair IV Dico Reyers Owning 6 October 19th 04 11:47 PM
Lancair 320 ram air? ROBIN FLY Home Built 17 January 7th 04 11:54 PM
Lancair 320/360 kit wanted!!! Erik W Owning 0 October 3rd 03 10:17 PM
Lancair IVP Peter Gottlieb Home Built 2 August 22nd 03 03:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.