Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross

Mxsmanic wrote:
dgs writes:

So... just what the *HELL* does this have to do with
aviation, whiny-boi?

Nothing. But people who dislike me regularly divert any discussion in which I
participate to a discussion of me personally. Perhaps they secretly admire
me, if they find me so much more interesting than the topic at hand.


No we divert any discussion you are in because once you join it you
start filling it with incorrect information that needs to be squashed so
some unsuspecting passerby doesn't mistake your babble for useful
information.

Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:
Gig 601Xl Builder writes:

Then why do you continue to read and post here?

There are some real and competent pilots here, even if the kiddies
drown them
out sometimes.


Great make it easy on us then. Please post a list of the posters here
whom you think are the real and competent pilots. That way everyone will
know you are only going to accept their advice.

There are many good pilots here Anthony. These people all offer good
advice. We have very few pilots here who are incompetent. Information is
passed back and forth freely. In this way, the good and bad information
is easily determined by others reading that information.

You could become a part of that "good information" if you wanted to
simply changing your approach to the group a bit.
Trust me, the group as a whole would much rather communicate with you in
a positive manner than what has developed.

I can prove that to you easily. Try posting to me in a positive and
friendly manner and I'll be happy to respond in kind.

Who knows...It might be a start?

--
Dudley Henriques

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:06:40 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:hZaQj.11651$3N1.4340
:


"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote in message
...
dgs wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:

I don't exceed weight limits.

You don't fly, numbnuts.


Just as he's never gone up, his testicles have never come down.



Hell of a good point Mort, must be a lesson there......


Boggle.
Scrabble

Jade


Bertie

Daedalus wrote in
:

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:06:40 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:hZaQj.11651$3N1.4340
:


"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote in message
...
dgs wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:

I don't exceed weight limits.

You don't fly, numbnuts.


Just as he's never gone up, his testicles have never come down.



Hell of a good point Mort, must be a lesson there......


Boggle.
Scrabble
Twister

Bertie



Jade


Bertie

Dudley Henriques writes:

Well, first of all, a Psychologist doesn't need a Doctorate to offer an
opinion.

A pilot doesn't need a license to fly.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Gig 601Xl Builder writes:

Then why do you continue to read and post here?

There are some real and competent pilots here


You should try it sometime.

-c

Dudley Henriques writes:

I can prove that to you easily. Try posting to me in a positive and
friendly manner and I'll be happy to respond in kind.

I'm always positive and friendly. It doesn't work.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes:

Of course one must consider that I for one am NOT a qualified
Psychologist and this is just my purely amatuer read on our friend.

So offering a psychological evaluation without a doctorate in psychology is
okay, but offering opinions on aviation without a pilot's license is not?

Not to pilots, when they're continually having to correct you.

Are you suggesting you have a doctorate in psychology, now, too?

Mxsmanic wrote:
gatt writes:

LOL! Yet, you can't differentiate between the private pilots, commercial
pilots, CFIs and ATP.

Yes, I can, since their qualifications are a matter of public record.

Bertie's, for example? "Buttman"? You only know my qualifications
based on what I tell you they are.


I participate in a lot of aviation discussions outside this newsgroup, but
this venue probably has the highest percentage of unqualified, blowhard
wannabes.


Based on the amount of posts you make here, that's undoubtedly so.

'Cept the problem is, 99% of the people here aren't wannabes. They're
pilots. You probably don't want to be calling everybody wannabes when
you've got no actual flight time. 'Cause as somebody pointed out, that
makes you the very backside of the curve.

-c

Mxsmanic wrote:
gatt writes:

Who else here "discusses aviation" with you?

There are several people here who seem level-headed, but I won't name them,
lest the treehouse club add them to the target list.

Surely somebody will step forward and defend you.

Why? I can defend myself very well indeed.

You completely missed yet another point.

-c