141 Schools

Buttman wrote in
:

RC_Moonpie wrote:

Do I want my
offspring to be a pilot or do I want them to be a regulation expert
with average skills?

Do you think part 61 schools are immune to all of these problems? I've
got news for you, no one is a "real pilot" by your definition at 250
hours, no matter whether they came from a part 141 school, or a part
61 school.

Not unless they;ve learned to shut the fuel off on takeoff, eh?


Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
Buttman wrote in
:

RC_Moonpie wrote:

Do I want my
offspring to be a pilot or do I want them to be a regulation expert
with average skills?

Do you think part 61 schools are immune to all of these problems? I've
got news for you, no one is a "real pilot" by your definition at 250
hours, no matter whether they came from a part 141 school, or a part
61 school.

Not unless they;ve learned to shut the fuel off on takeoff, eh?


Bertie

But surely you would agree to shutting off the fuel while teaching your "hot
dog" approaches. After all, skill level and such.

Maxwell wrote:


But surely you would agree to shutting off the fuel while teaching your "hot
dog" approaches. After all, skill level and such.




I really have to jump in here. Do you really think that an
non-stabilized approach is a "hot dog" approach? Or are you just blowing
smoke at Bertie?

Gig 601Xl Builder wrote in
m:

Maxwell wrote:


But surely you would agree to shutting off the fuel while teaching
your "hot dog" approaches. After all, skill level and such.




I really have to jump in here. Do you really think that an
non-stabilized approach is a "hot dog" approach? Or are you just
blowing smoke at Bertie?


And me a non smoker. The inconsiderate nico-nazi....


Bertie

"Gig 601Xl Builder" wrote in message
m...
Maxwell wrote:


But surely you would agree to shutting off the fuel while teaching your
"hot dog" approaches. After all, skill level and such.




I really have to jump in here. Do you really think that an non-stabilized
approach is a "hot dog" approach? Or are you just blowing smoke at Bertie?

No, just laughing a dumb ass because thinks our collective skills as pilots
are going to hell, because fly traffic patterns.

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
:


"Gig 601Xl Builder" wrote in message
m...
Maxwell wrote:


But surely you would agree to shutting off the fuel while teaching
your "hot dog" approaches. After all, skill level and such.




I really have to jump in here. Do you really think that an
non-stabilized approach is a "hot dog" approach? Or are you just
blowing smoke at Bertie?

No, just laughing a dumb ass because thinks our collective skills as
pilots are going to hell, because fly traffic patterns.


Wel, your language skills are certainly going to hell. And it has
nothing to do with traffic patterns, but how woul dyou know that?


You know **** all.


Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
:


"Gig 601Xl Builder" wrote in message
m...
Maxwell wrote:


But surely you would agree to shutting off the fuel while teaching
your "hot dog" approaches. After all, skill level and such.




I really have to jump in here. Do you really think that an
non-stabilized approach is a "hot dog" approach? Or are you just
blowing smoke at Bertie?

No, just laughing a dumb ass because thinks our collective skills as
pilots are going to hell, because fly traffic patterns.


Wel, your language skills are certainly going to hell. And it has
nothing to do with traffic patterns, but how woul dyou know that?


You know **** all.


Bertie




Once again, the poster child for fat fingered, drunken,
dyslexics..............yadda, yadda, yadda