![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 02 May 2008 01:03:38 GMT, Jay Maynard
wrote: On 2008-05-02, Peter Dohm wrote: the SLSA itself is certified to a lower standard than we are otherwise accustomed to seeing--although, AFAIK, there is probably not much practical difference in day VFR service. I was told recently that the flight testing standards for an SLSA are 4 pages long, while the flight testing standards for a normal category part 23 certificated aircraft are 38 pages long. Not really a fair comparison, since the ASTM Airplane standard only covers one narrowly-defined type of aircraft, while Part 23 covers four broad categories (Normal, Utility, Aerobatic, and Commuter) and covers aircraft with constant-speed props, more than one engine, turbines, jets, etc. My paper copy of 14CFR Part 23 has ~14 pages for the requirements for flight characteristics; ASTM F2245-04 runs about two for the same topic. Ron Wanttaja |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kinda OT... but has some aviation content ;) | Bertie the Bunyip[_22_] | Piloting | 1 | January 20th 08 02:28 PM |
Kinda sad... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 25 | February 27th 06 09:27 PM |
Kinda funny... | Ditch | Military Aviation | 4 | July 12th 03 07:23 AM |