Auto Engine Conversion Video

"Steve Hix" wrote in message
...
In article ,
cavelamb himself wrote:

Morgans wrote:

"stol" wrote

Hi Jim. This is exactly the feedback I was looking for. My gut feeling
is that I should re edit the video and leave some more space in some
of the shots to answer those and more questions.



You could freeze a frame when you are looking at the appropriate area
of
the plane or engine, and add some narration. I don't know how to do
that, but I know it can be done.


That would be very noticible.
Video looks bad still frame.

Depends on the camera and mode that was used.

If the camera records full frames, you're good, if it records successive
frames, it will look quite poor.

BTW, successive frames might also be referred to as fields.

In article ,
"Peter Dohm" wrote:

"Steve Hix" wrote in message
...
In article ,
cavelamb himself wrote:

Morgans wrote:

"stol" wrote

Hi Jim. This is exactly the feedback I was looking for. My gut feeling
is that I should re edit the video and leave some more space in some
of the shots to answer those and more questions.



You could freeze a frame when you are looking at the appropriate area
of
the plane or engine, and add some narration. I don't know how to do
that, but I know it can be done.


That would be very noticible.
Video looks bad still frame.

Depends on the camera and mode that was used.

If the camera records full frames, you're good, if it records successive
frames, it will look quite poor.

BTW, successive frames might also be referred to as fields.

Right.

I meant fields. Two per frame.

Really.