![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 1, 7:16*pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2008 17:08:21 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary" wrote in : ... do you just spend your day looking for irrelevant information on the internet? Why do you feel the subject of on-the-job fraud among ATC personnel is irrelevant to an aviation newsgroup? * Because it doesn't seem like you are doing it to generate real discussion. You're just doing the drive-by thing. You drop little bombs on the list and see which ones generate an uproar. -Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 2 May 2008 10:23:27 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote in : On May 1, 7:16*pm, Larry Dighera wrote: On Thu, 1 May 2008 17:08:21 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary" wrote in : ... do you just spend your day looking for irrelevant information on the internet? Why do you feel the subject of on-the-job fraud among ATC personnel is irrelevant to an aviation newsgroup? * Because it doesn't seem like you are doing it to generate real discussion. So it's not that you feel that the subject of on-the-job fraud among ATC personnel is irrelevant to an aviation newsgroup, but more that you seek to discover my motivation for posting such information. You're just doing the drive-by thing. You drop little bombs on the list and see which ones generate an uproar. I attempt to provide a nucleus of information around which discussion may proceed. If I have views on the subject, I express them. If not, it is my hope that others may. I find it curious that you seek to know my mind rather than discuss the topics of the articles I post. It's flattering, but a rose on my doorstep each morning would be more enticing. :-) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
On May 1, 7:16 pm, Larry Dighera wrote: On Thu, 1 May 2008 17:08:21 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary" wrote in : ... do you just spend your day looking for irrelevant information on the internet? Why do you feel the subject of on-the-job fraud among ATC personnel is irrelevant to an aviation newsgroup? Because it doesn't seem like you are doing it to generate real discussion. You're just doing the drive-by thing. You drop little bombs on the list and see which ones generate an uproar. -Robert The FAA is "Incompetency on Parade" I think the concerns regarding the FAA are very relevant If you really want to create an "Uproar" talk about this non-politically correct taboo subject Ask FAA senior management and the airlines and the press if there is any correlation between the FAA turning to **** starting about 10 years ago(Along with the airlines going to ****) and the FAA filling their top ranks with incompetent women and minorities in senior management positions all in the name of diversity and progressiveness(Both huge SCAMS) Try that for an "Uproar" Also ask while the flames are building if white males over 40 are discriminated against in the FAA? Whooooooooooooooooooosh!!!(Sound of gasoline on fire) Ask FAA management and Congress and the Press why is the FAA CUTTING controller and technician and aircraft inspector positions while EXPANDING Civil Rights and Diversity empires in Washington D.C.(Sound of explosion) The facts are they are all true It is why the FAA is a cluster **** mess Incompetent women and blacks and white male sycophants are ruining the FAA and Government |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 02 May 2008 13:45:09 -0400, EMTAE wrote
in : It is why the FAA is a cluster **** mess Incompetent women and blacks and white male sycophants are ruining the FAA and Government Oh, I see, presuming you're not a felon, you'll be voting for Obama or perhaps Hillary. :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 02 May 2008 13:45:09 -0400, EMTAE wrote in : It is why the FAA is a cluster **** mess Incompetent women and blacks and white male sycophants are ruining the FAA and Government Oh, I see, presuming you're not a felon, you'll be voting for Obama or perhaps Hillary. :-) Yea right |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 02 May 2008 14:00:05 -0400, EMTAE wrote
in : Larry Dighera wrote: On Fri, 02 May 2008 13:45:09 -0400, EMTAE wrote in : It is why the FAA is a cluster **** mess Incompetent women and blacks and white male sycophants are ruining the FAA and Government Oh, I see, presuming you're not a felon, you'll be voting for Obama or perhaps Hillary. :-) Yea right You know, this election is vexing indeed for racial bigots and misogynists. Despite having the interests of big business (paharma, oil, military-industrial, ...) unreasonably forced ahead of the best interests of the people of our noble nation by the RNC, they are unable to disempower the rapacious RNC by voting in a Democratic president. What I truly find ironic are the small businessmen and women who believe the Republican Party supports their business interests. If it's not apparent that the RNC places the needs of our nation and its people well behind the transfer of wealth from the pockets of tax payers into the vaults of Fortune 500 corporations and their executives, they need to start thinking for themselves. Who benefited from the Bush tax cuts? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 02 May 2008 14:00:05 -0400, EMTAE wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: On Fri, 02 May 2008 13:45:09 -0400, EMTAE wrote in : It is why the FAA is a cluster **** mess Incompetent women and blacks and white male sycophants are ruining the FAA and Government Oh, I see, presuming you're not a felon, you'll be voting for Obama or perhaps Hillary. :-) Yea right You know, this election is vexing indeed for racial bigots and misogynists. Despite having the interests of big business (paharma, oil, military-industrial, ...) unreasonably forced ahead of the best interests of the people of our noble nation by the RNC, they are unable to disempower the rapacious RNC by voting in a Democratic president. What I truly find ironic are the small businessmen and women who believe the Republican Party supports their business interests. If it's not apparent that the RNC places the needs of our nation and its people well behind the transfer of wealth from the pockets of tax payers into the vaults of Fortune 500 corporations and their executives, they need to start thinking for themselves. Who benefited from the Bush tax cuts? Wow, if you don't favor Obama or Clinton, you are a "racial bigot" or you hate women. Fascinating application of logic. Perhaps if you vote for Obama or Clinton you hate prisoners of war veterans? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 03 May 2008 17:18:36 -0400, Jennifer Allen
wrote in : Wow, if you don't favor Obama or Clinton, you are a "racial bigot" or you hate women. Fascinating application of logic. My followup article was in response to this one: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...1098b084248a72 When you have taken the time to see the bigoted, misogynistic content of that article, you will better understand my comment, sweetie. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
Who benefited from the Bush tax cuts? Taxpayers. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 3 May 2008 17:27:12 -0500, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: Who benefited from the Bush tax cuts? Taxpayers. I would venture, that you and I, and the vast majority of tax payers were not among those families earning more than $1 million a year who benefited most: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/08/washington/08tax.html Tax Cuts Offer Most for Very Rich, Study Says By EDMUND L. ANDREWS Published: January 8, 2007 WASHINGTON, Jan. 7 — Families earning more than $1 million a year saw their federal tax rates drop more sharply than any group in the country as a result of President Bush’s tax cuts, according to a new Congressional study. The study, by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, also shows that tax rates for middle-income earners edged up in 2004, the most recent year for which data was available, while rates for people at the very top continued to decline. Based on an exhaustive analysis of tax records and census data, the study reinforced the sense that while Mr. Bush’s tax cuts reduced rates for people at every income level, they offered the biggest benefits by far to people at the very top — especially the top 1 percent of income earners. ... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DFW ATC identifying Operational Errors As Pilot Errors? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 8 | July 18th 07 10:49 PM |
OLC errors ! | Mal[_3_] | Soaring | 0 | April 17th 07 12:33 PM |
Count the errors here... | Kingfish | Piloting | 12 | December 15th 06 10:39 PM |
NE-2 and NE-4 chart errors | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | September 6th 05 06:56 PM |
TE errors | f.blair | Soaring | 7 | March 9th 05 08:51 AM |