Dallas-Fort Worth TRACON Management Routinely Misclassified Operational Errors and Deviations as Pilot Errors

On May 1, 7:16*pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2008 17:08:21 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote in
:

... do you just spend your day looking for irrelevant information on the internet?

Why do you feel the subject of on-the-job fraud among ATC personnel is
irrelevant to an aviation newsgroup? *

Because it doesn't seem like you are doing it to generate real
discussion. You're just doing the drive-by thing. You drop little
bombs on the list and see which ones generate an uproar.

-Robert

On Fri, 2 May 2008 10:23:27 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote in
:

On May 1, 7:16*pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2008 17:08:21 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote in
:

... do you just spend your day looking for irrelevant information on the internet?

Why do you feel the subject of on-the-job fraud among ATC personnel is
irrelevant to an aviation newsgroup? *

Because it doesn't seem like you are doing it to generate real
discussion.

So it's not that you feel that the subject of on-the-job fraud among
ATC personnel is irrelevant to an aviation newsgroup, but more that
you seek to discover my motivation for posting such information.

You're just doing the drive-by thing. You drop little
bombs on the list and see which ones generate an uproar.

I attempt to provide a nucleus of information around which discussion
may proceed. If I have views on the subject, I express them. If not,
it is my hope that others may.

I find it curious that you seek to know my mind rather than discuss
the topics of the articles I post. It's flattering, but a rose on my
doorstep each morning would be more enticing. :-)

Robert M. Gary wrote:
On May 1, 7:16 pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2008 17:08:21 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote in
:

... do you just spend your day looking for irrelevant information on the internet?
Why do you feel the subject of on-the-job fraud among ATC personnel is
irrelevant to an aviation newsgroup?

Because it doesn't seem like you are doing it to generate real
discussion. You're just doing the drive-by thing. You drop little
bombs on the list and see which ones generate an uproar.

-Robert

The FAA is "Incompetency on Parade"
I think the concerns regarding the FAA are very relevant

If you really want to create an "Uproar" talk about this
non-politically correct taboo subject

Ask FAA senior management and the airlines and the press if
there is any correlation between the FAA turning to ****
starting about 10 years ago(Along with the airlines going to
****) and the FAA filling their top ranks with incompetent
women and minorities in senior management positions all in
the name of diversity and progressiveness(Both huge SCAMS)

Try that for an "Uproar"

Also ask while the flames are building if white males over
40 are discriminated against in the FAA?

Whooooooooooooooooooosh!!!(Sound of gasoline on fire)

Ask FAA management and Congress and the Press why is the FAA
CUTTING controller and technician and aircraft inspector
positions while EXPANDING Civil Rights and Diversity empires
in Washington D.C.(Sound of explosion)

The facts are they are all true
It is why the FAA is a cluster **** mess
Incompetent women and blacks and white male sycophants are
ruining the FAA and Government

On Fri, 02 May 2008 13:45:09 -0400, EMTAE wrote
in :

It is why the FAA is a cluster **** mess
Incompetent women and blacks and white male sycophants are
ruining the FAA and Government


Oh, I see, presuming you're not a felon, you'll be voting for Obama or
perhaps Hillary. :-)

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 02 May 2008 13:45:09 -0400, EMTAE wrote
in :

It is why the FAA is a cluster **** mess
Incompetent women and blacks and white male sycophants are
ruining the FAA and Government


Oh, I see, presuming you're not a felon, you'll be voting for Obama or
perhaps Hillary. :-)

Yea right

On Fri, 02 May 2008 14:00:05 -0400, EMTAE wrote
in :

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 02 May 2008 13:45:09 -0400, EMTAE wrote
in :

It is why the FAA is a cluster **** mess
Incompetent women and blacks and white male sycophants are
ruining the FAA and Government


Oh, I see, presuming you're not a felon, you'll be voting for Obama or
perhaps Hillary. :-)

Yea right

You know, this election is vexing indeed for racial bigots and
misogynists. Despite having the interests of big business (paharma,
oil, military-industrial, ...) unreasonably forced ahead of the best
interests of the people of our noble nation by the RNC, they are
unable to disempower the rapacious RNC by voting in a Democratic
president.

What I truly find ironic are the small businessmen and women who
believe the Republican Party supports their business interests. If
it's not apparent that the RNC places the needs of our nation and its
people well behind the transfer of wealth from the pockets of tax
payers into the vaults of Fortune 500 corporations and their
executives, they need to start thinking for themselves. Who benefited
from the Bush tax cuts?

Larry Dighera wrote:

On Fri, 02 May 2008 14:00:05 -0400, EMTAE wrote
in :

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 02 May 2008 13:45:09 -0400, EMTAE wrote
in :

It is why the FAA is a cluster **** mess
Incompetent women and blacks and white male sycophants are
ruining the FAA and Government


Oh, I see, presuming you're not a felon, you'll be voting for Obama or
perhaps Hillary. :-)

Yea right

You know, this election is vexing indeed for racial bigots and
misogynists. Despite having the interests of big business (paharma,
oil, military-industrial, ...) unreasonably forced ahead of the best
interests of the people of our noble nation by the RNC, they are
unable to disempower the rapacious RNC by voting in a Democratic
president.

What I truly find ironic are the small businessmen and women who
believe the Republican Party supports their business interests. If
it's not apparent that the RNC places the needs of our nation and its
people well behind the transfer of wealth from the pockets of tax
payers into the vaults of Fortune 500 corporations and their
executives, they need to start thinking for themselves. Who benefited
from the Bush tax cuts?

Wow, if you don't favor Obama or Clinton, you are a "racial bigot" or you
hate women. Fascinating application of logic. Perhaps if you vote for Obama
or Clinton you hate prisoners of war veterans?

On Sat, 03 May 2008 17:18:36 -0400, Jennifer Allen
wrote in :


Wow, if you don't favor Obama or Clinton, you are a "racial bigot" or you
hate women. Fascinating application of logic.

My followup article was in response to this one:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...1098b084248a72

When you have taken the time to see the bigoted, misogynistic content
of that article, you will better understand my comment, sweetie.

Larry Dighera wrote:

Who benefited from the Bush tax cuts?


Taxpayers.

On Sat, 3 May 2008 17:27:12 -0500, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote in
:

Larry Dighera wrote:

Who benefited from the Bush tax cuts?


Taxpayers.


I would venture, that you and I, and the vast majority of tax payers
were not among those families earning more than $1 million a year who
benefited most:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/08/washington/08tax.html
Tax Cuts Offer Most for Very Rich, Study Says

By EDMUND L. ANDREWS
Published: January 8, 2007

WASHINGTON, Jan. 7 — Families earning more than $1 million a year
saw their federal tax rates drop more sharply than any group in
the country as a result of President Bush’s tax cuts, according to
a new Congressional study.

The study, by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, also
shows that tax rates for middle-income earners edged up in 2004,
the most recent year for which data was available, while rates for
people at the very top continued to decline.

Based on an exhaustive analysis of tax records and census data,
the study reinforced the sense that while Mr. Bush’s tax cuts
reduced rates for people at every income level, they offered the
biggest benefits by far to people at the very top — especially the
top 1 percent of income earners. ...